linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lorenzo Stoakes <lstoakes@gmail.com>
To: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
	Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
	Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>,
	Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>,
	Hyeonggon Yoo <42.hyeyoo@gmail.com>,
	Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org,
	patches@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/slab: remove HAVE_HARDENED_USERCOPY_ALLOCATOR
Date: Tue, 23 May 2023 08:42:21 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <310077ed-6f3f-41fe-afcf-36500a9408ec@lucifer.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230523073136.4900-1-vbabka@suse.cz>

On Tue, May 23, 2023 at 09:31:36AM +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> With SLOB removed, both remaining allocators support hardened usercopy,
> so remove the config and associated #ifdef.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
> ---
>  mm/Kconfig       | 2 --
>  mm/slab.h        | 9 ---------
>  security/Kconfig | 8 --------
>  3 files changed, 19 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/Kconfig b/mm/Kconfig
> index 7672a22647b4..041f0da42f2b 100644
> --- a/mm/Kconfig
> +++ b/mm/Kconfig
> @@ -221,7 +221,6 @@ choice
>  config SLAB
>  	bool "SLAB"
>  	depends on !PREEMPT_RT
> -	select HAVE_HARDENED_USERCOPY_ALLOCATOR
>  	help
>  	  The regular slab allocator that is established and known to work
>  	  well in all environments. It organizes cache hot objects in
> @@ -229,7 +228,6 @@ config SLAB
>
>  config SLUB
>  	bool "SLUB (Unqueued Allocator)"
> -	select HAVE_HARDENED_USERCOPY_ALLOCATOR
>  	help
>  	   SLUB is a slab allocator that minimizes cache line usage
>  	   instead of managing queues of cached objects (SLAB approach).
> diff --git a/mm/slab.h b/mm/slab.h
> index f01ac256a8f5..695ef96b4b5b 100644
> --- a/mm/slab.h
> +++ b/mm/slab.h
> @@ -832,17 +832,8 @@ struct kmem_obj_info {
>  void __kmem_obj_info(struct kmem_obj_info *kpp, void *object, struct slab *slab);
>  #endif
>
> -#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_HARDENED_USERCOPY_ALLOCATOR
>  void __check_heap_object(const void *ptr, unsigned long n,
>  			 const struct slab *slab, bool to_user);
> -#else
> -static inline
> -void __check_heap_object(const void *ptr, unsigned long n,
> -			 const struct slab *slab, bool to_user)
> -{
> -}
> -#endif

Hm, this is still defined in slab.c/slub.c and invoked in usercopy.c, do we
not want the prototype? Perhaps replacing with #ifdef
CONFIG_HARDENED_USERCOPY instead? I may be missing something here :)

> -
>  #ifdef CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG
>  void skip_orig_size_check(struct kmem_cache *s, const void *object);
>  #endif
> diff --git a/security/Kconfig b/security/Kconfig
> index 97abeb9b9a19..52c9af08ad35 100644
> --- a/security/Kconfig
> +++ b/security/Kconfig
> @@ -127,16 +127,8 @@ config LSM_MMAP_MIN_ADDR
>  	  this low address space will need the permission specific to the
>  	  systems running LSM.
>
> -config HAVE_HARDENED_USERCOPY_ALLOCATOR
> -	bool
> -	help
> -	  The heap allocator implements __check_heap_object() for
> -	  validating memory ranges against heap object sizes in
> -	  support of CONFIG_HARDENED_USERCOPY.
> -
>  config HARDENED_USERCOPY
>  	bool "Harden memory copies between kernel and userspace"
> -	depends on HAVE_HARDENED_USERCOPY_ALLOCATOR
>  	imply STRICT_DEVMEM
>  	help
>  	  This option checks for obviously wrong memory regions when
> --
> 2.40.1
>


  reply	other threads:[~2023-05-23  7:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-05-23  7:31 Vlastimil Babka
2023-05-23  7:42 ` Lorenzo Stoakes [this message]
2023-05-23  7:46   ` Vlastimil Babka
2023-05-23  7:56     ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2023-05-23  8:14       ` David Hildenbrand
2023-05-23  8:19         ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2023-05-23  8:28           ` David Hildenbrand
2023-05-24  7:15             ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2023-05-23 17:02         ` Kees Cook
2023-05-24  0:31           ` David Rientjes
2023-05-24  6:15             ` Hyeonggon Yoo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=310077ed-6f3f-41fe-afcf-36500a9408ec@lucifer.local \
    --to=lstoakes@gmail.com \
    --cc=42.hyeyoo@gmail.com \
    --cc=cl@linux.com \
    --cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=patches@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=penberg@kernel.org \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox