linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
To: Dev Jain <dev.jain@arm.com>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, willy@infradead.org,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, david@redhat.com,
	anshuman.khandual@arm.com, ryan.roberts@arm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xarray: Add a BUG_ON() to ensure caller is not sibling
Date: Wed, 28 May 2025 13:12:47 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <30EECA35-4622-46B5-857D-484282E92AAF@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250528113124.87084-1-dev.jain@arm.com>

On 28 May 2025, at 7:31, Dev Jain wrote:

> Suppose xas is pointing somewhere near the end of the multi-entry batch.
> Then it may happen that the computed slot already falls beyond the batch,
> thus breaking the loop due to !xa_is_sibling(), and computing the wrong
> order. Thus ensure that the caller is aware of this by triggering a BUG
> when the entry is a sibling entry.

Is it possible to add a test case in lib/test_xarray.c for this?
You can compile the tests with “make -C tools/testing/radix-tree”
and run “./tools/testing/radix-tree/xarray”.

>
> This patch is motivated by code inspection and not a real bug report.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dev Jain <dev.jain@arm.com>
> ---
> The patch applies on 6.15 kernel.
>
>  lib/xarray.c | 2 ++
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/lib/xarray.c b/lib/xarray.c
> index 9644b18af18d..0f699766c24f 100644
> --- a/lib/xarray.c
> +++ b/lib/xarray.c
> @@ -1917,6 +1917,8 @@ int xas_get_order(struct xa_state *xas)
>  	if (!xas->xa_node)
>  		return 0;
>
> +	XA_NODE_BUG_ON(xas->xa_node, xa_is_sibling(xa_entry(xas->xa,
> +		       xas->xa_node, xas->xa_offset)));
>  	for (;;) {
>  		unsigned int slot = xas->xa_offset + (1 << order);
>
> -- 
> 2.30.2


Best Regards,
Yan, Zi


  reply	other threads:[~2025-05-28 17:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-05-28 11:31 Dev Jain
2025-05-28 17:12 ` Zi Yan [this message]
2025-05-29  3:17   ` Dev Jain
2025-05-29 22:47     ` Zi Yan
2025-05-29 23:04       ` Zi Yan
2025-05-30  3:44       ` Dev Jain
2025-06-02 15:03         ` Zi Yan
2025-06-03  5:23           ` Dev Jain
2025-06-03  7:58             ` David Hildenbrand
2025-06-03 12:17               ` Zi Yan
2025-06-03 12:59                 ` Dev Jain
2025-06-03 13:57                   ` Zi Yan
2025-06-03 14:07                     ` Dev Jain
2025-06-02  5:44       ` Dev Jain

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=30EECA35-4622-46B5-857D-484282E92AAF@nvidia.com \
    --to=ziy@nvidia.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=dev.jain@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox