From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Tue, 03 Dec 2002 12:08:09 -0800 From: "Martin J. Bligh" Subject: Re: [PATCH] 2.4.20-rmap15a Message-ID: <30200000.1038946087@titus> In-Reply-To: <20021203195854.GA6709@zork.net> References: <6usmxfys45.fsf@zork.zork.net> <20021203195854.GA6709@zork.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: The One True Dave Barry , linux-mm@kvack.org Cc: sneakums@zork.net List-ID: > This is correct, and believe it or not i'm even using > 2.4.19 + rmap15a, no other patches. I don't have my hard > numbers available, but the difference between builds was quite > significant, something like: > > 2.4.19 vanilla: > real 85m > > 2.4.19-rmap15a: > real 102m Assuming the extra time is eaten in Sys, not User, can you get a profile of each, & post them? M. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/