From: LEROY Christophe <christophe.leroy2@cs-soprasteria.com>
To: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>, Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
"linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 16/18] powerpc/64s: Use contiguous PMD/PUD instead of HUGEPD
Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2024 14:24:51 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2f9fc4fd-97ad-4eca-94bd-e420a2e6abdc@cs-soprasteria.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZmqiI5Q8DyyEA0gW@localhost.localdomain>
Le 13/06/2024 à 09:39, Oscar Salvador a écrit :
> On Mon, Jun 10, 2024 at 07:55:01AM +0200, Christophe Leroy wrote:
>> On book3s/64, the only user of hugepd is hash in 4k mode.
>>
>> All other setups (hash-64, radix-4, radix-64) use leaf PMD/PUD.
>>
>> Rework hash-4k to use contiguous PMD and PUD instead.
>>
>> In that setup there are only two huge page sizes: 16M and 16G.
>>
>> 16M sits at PMD level and 16G at PUD level.
>>
>> pte_update doesn't know page size, lets use the same trick as
>> hpte_need_flush() to get page size from segment properties. That's
>> not the most efficient way but let's do that until callers of
>> pte_update() provide page size instead of just a huge flag.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
>> ---
> ...
>> +static inline unsigned long hash__pte_update(struct mm_struct *mm,
>> + unsigned long addr,
>> + pte_t *ptep, unsigned long clr,
>> + unsigned long set,
>> + int huge)
>> +{
>> + unsigned long old;
>> +
>> + old = hash__pte_update_one(ptep, clr, set);
>> +
>> + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PPC_4K_PAGES) && huge) {
>> + unsigned int psize = get_slice_psize(mm, addr);
>> + int nb, i;
>> +
>> + if (psize == MMU_PAGE_16M)
>> + nb = SZ_16M / PMD_SIZE;
>> + else if (psize == MMU_PAGE_16G)
>> + nb = SZ_16G / PUD_SIZE;
>> + else
>> + nb = 1;
>
> Although that might be a safe default, it might carry consequences down the road?
> It might not, but if we reach that, something went wrong, so I would put a
> WARN_ON_ONCE at least.
Ah right you said it already and I forgot it.
It is now in v6.
>
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/mm/book3s64/hugetlbpage.c
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/mm/book3s64/hugetlbpage.c
>> @@ -53,6 +53,16 @@ int __hash_page_huge(unsigned long ea, unsigned long access, unsigned long vsid,
>> /* If PTE permissions don't match, take page fault */
>> if (unlikely(!check_pte_access(access, old_pte)))
>> return 1;
>> + /*
>> + * If hash-4k, hugepages use seeral contiguous PxD entries
>> + * so bail out and let mm make the page young or dirty
>> + */
>> + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PPC_4K_PAGES)) {
>> + if (!(old_pte & _PAGE_ACCESSED))
>> + return 1;
>> + if ((access & _PAGE_WRITE) && !(old_pte & _PAGE_DIRTY))
>> + return 1;
>> + }
>
> You mentioned that we need to bail out otherwise only the first PxD would be
> updated.
> In the comment you say that mm will take care of making the page young
> or dirty.
> Does this mean that the PxDs underneath will not have its bits updated?
>
>
No it just means that mm will do it properly by using
huge_ptep_set_access_flags()
Christophe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-06-24 14:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-06-10 5:54 [PATCH v5 00/18] Reimplement huge pages without hugepd on powerpc (8xx, e500, book3s/64) Christophe Leroy
2024-06-10 5:54 ` [PATCH v5 01/18] powerpc/64e: Remove unused IBM HTW code [SQUASHED] Christophe Leroy
2024-06-10 5:54 ` [PATCH v5 02/18] mm: Define __pte_leaf_size() to also take a PMD entry Christophe Leroy
2024-06-11 9:34 ` Oscar Salvador
2024-06-11 14:17 ` Peter Xu
2024-06-11 15:08 ` Oscar Salvador
2024-06-11 15:20 ` Peter Xu
2024-06-11 16:10 ` Oscar Salvador
2024-06-11 19:00 ` LEROY Christophe
2024-06-11 21:43 ` Peter Xu
2024-06-13 7:19 ` Oscar Salvador
2024-06-13 16:43 ` LEROY Christophe
2024-06-14 14:14 ` Oscar Salvador
2024-06-11 16:53 ` LEROY Christophe
2024-06-11 14:50 ` LEROY Christophe
2024-06-10 5:54 ` [PATCH v5 03/18] mm: Provide mm_struct and address to huge_ptep_get() Christophe Leroy
2024-06-10 5:54 ` [PATCH v5 04/18] powerpc/mm: Remove _PAGE_PSIZE Christophe Leroy
2024-06-10 5:54 ` [PATCH v5 05/18] powerpc/mm: Fix __find_linux_pte() on 32 bits with PMD leaf entries Christophe Leroy
2024-06-10 5:54 ` [PATCH v5 06/18] powerpc/mm: Allow hugepages without hugepd Christophe Leroy
2024-06-10 5:54 ` [PATCH v5 07/18] powerpc/8xx: Fix size given to set_huge_pte_at() Christophe Leroy
2024-06-10 5:54 ` [PATCH v5 08/18] powerpc/8xx: Rework support for 8M pages using contiguous PTE entries Christophe Leroy
2024-06-10 5:54 ` [PATCH v5 09/18] powerpc/8xx: Simplify struct mmu_psize_def Christophe Leroy
2024-06-10 5:54 ` [PATCH v5 10/18] powerpc/e500: Remove enc and ind fields from " Christophe Leroy
2024-06-10 5:54 ` [PATCH v5 11/18] powerpc/e500: Switch to 64 bits PGD on 85xx (32 bits) Christophe Leroy
2024-06-10 5:54 ` [PATCH v5 12/18] powerpc/e500: Encode hugepage size in PTE bits Christophe Leroy
2024-06-10 5:54 ` [PATCH v5 13/18] powerpc/e500: Don't pre-check write access on data TLB error Christophe Leroy
2024-06-10 5:54 ` [PATCH v5 14/18] powerpc/e500: Free r10 for FIND_PTE Christophe Leroy
2024-06-10 5:55 ` [PATCH v5 15/18] powerpc/e500: Use contiguous PMD instead of hugepd Christophe Leroy
2024-06-10 5:55 ` [PATCH v5 16/18] powerpc/64s: Use contiguous PMD/PUD instead of HUGEPD Christophe Leroy
2024-06-13 7:39 ` Oscar Salvador
2024-06-24 14:24 ` LEROY Christophe [this message]
2024-06-10 5:55 ` [PATCH v5 17/18] powerpc/mm: Remove hugepd leftovers Christophe Leroy
2024-06-10 5:55 ` [PATCH v5 18/18] mm: Remove CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_HUGEPD Christophe Leroy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2f9fc4fd-97ad-4eca-94bd-e420a2e6abdc@cs-soprasteria.com \
--to=christophe.leroy2@cs-soprasteria.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
--cc=osalvador@suse.de \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox