linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>
To: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
	Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>,
	David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] mm: migrate: convert numamigrate_isolate_page() to numamigrate_isolate_folio()
Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2023 15:08:10 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2f6c2ddb-b1a7-7152-bb7c-a5dcaf61ce36@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZMpMfQUktateeN1D@casper.infradead.org>



On 2023/8/2 20:30, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 02, 2023 at 05:53:44PM +0800, Kefeng Wang wrote:
>> -static int numamigrate_isolate_page(pg_data_t *pgdat, struct page *page)
>> +static int numamigrate_isolate_folio(pg_data_t *pgdat, struct folio *folio)
>>   {
>> -	int nr_pages = thp_nr_pages(page);
>> -	int order = compound_order(page);
>> +	int nr_pages = folio_nr_pages(folio);
>> +	int order = folio_order(folio);
>>   
>> -	VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(order && !PageTransHuge(page), page);
>> +	VM_BUG_ON_FOLIO(order && !folio_test_pmd_mappable(folio), folio);
> 
> I don't know why we have this assertion.  I would be inclined to delete
> it as part of generalising the migration code to handle arbitrary sizes
> of folio, rather than assert that we only support PMD size folios.

Ok, will drop it.
> 
>>   	/* Do not migrate THP mapped by multiple processes */
>> -	if (PageTransHuge(page) && total_mapcount(page) > 1)
>> +	if (folio_test_pmd_mappable(folio) && folio_estimated_sharers(folio) > 1)
>>   		return 0;
> 
> I don't know if this is the right logic.  We've willing to move folios
> mapped by multiple processes, as long as they're smaller than PMD size,
> but once they get to PMD size they're magical and can't be moved?

It seems that the logical is introduced by commit 04fa5d6a6547 ("mm:
migrate: check page_count of THP before migrating") and refactor by
340ef3902cf2 ("mm: numa: cleanup flow of transhuge page migration"),


   "Hugh Dickins pointed out that migrate_misplaced_transhuge_page() does
   not check page_count before migrating like base page migration and
   khugepage.  He could not see why this was safe and he is right."

For now, there is no migrate_misplaced_transhuge_page() and base/thp
page migrate's path is unified, there is a check(for old/new kernel) in 
migrate_misplaced_page(),

  "Don't migrate file pages that are mapped in multiple processes
  with execute permissions as they are probably shared libraries."

We could drop the above check in numamigrate_isolate_page(), but
according to 04fa5d6a6547, maybe disable migrate page shared by
multi-process during numa balance for both base/thp page.


> 
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2023-08-03  7:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-08-02  9:53 [PATCH 0/4] mm: migrate: more folio conversion Kefeng Wang
2023-08-02  9:53 ` [PATCH 1/4] mm: migrate: use a folio in add_page_for_migration() Kefeng Wang
2023-08-02 12:21   ` Matthew Wilcox
2023-08-03  7:13     ` Kefeng Wang
2023-08-03 12:30       ` Matthew Wilcox
2023-08-04  1:45         ` Kefeng Wang
2023-08-04  2:42           ` Zi Yan
2023-08-04  5:54             ` Kefeng Wang
2023-08-07 12:20               ` Kefeng Wang
2023-08-07 18:45                 ` Zi Yan
2023-08-09 12:37                   ` Kefeng Wang
2023-08-09 20:53                     ` Mike Kravetz
2023-08-09 22:44                       ` Mike Kravetz
2023-08-10  1:49                         ` Kefeng Wang
2023-08-10 16:29                           ` Mike Kravetz
2023-08-15  3:58                             ` Huang, Ying
2023-08-15 21:12                               ` Mike Kravetz
2023-08-16  0:50                                 ` Kefeng Wang
2023-08-15  3:56               ` Huang, Ying
2023-08-15 13:49                 ` Zi Yan
2023-08-15 20:39                   ` Huang, Ying
2023-08-02  9:53 ` [PATCH 2/4] mm: migrate: convert numamigrate_isolate_page() to numamigrate_isolate_folio() Kefeng Wang
2023-08-02 12:30   ` Matthew Wilcox
2023-08-03  7:08     ` Kefeng Wang [this message]
2023-08-06  5:04       ` Hugh Dickins
2023-08-02  9:53 ` [PATCH 3/4] mm: migrate: make migrate_misplaced_page() to take a folio Kefeng Wang
2023-08-02  9:53 ` [PATCH 4/4] mm: migrate: use __folio_test_movable() Kefeng Wang
2023-08-02 12:37   ` Matthew Wilcox
2023-08-02 12:38   ` David Hildenbrand
2023-08-02 11:47 ` [PATCH 0/4] mm: migrate: more folio conversion David Hildenbrand
2023-08-02 12:38   ` Kefeng Wang
2023-08-03  9:34     ` David Hildenbrand

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2f6c2ddb-b1a7-7152-bb7c-a5dcaf61ce36@huawei.com \
    --to=wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=hughd@google.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    --cc=ying.huang@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox