From: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>
To: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] mm: migrate: convert numamigrate_isolate_page() to numamigrate_isolate_folio()
Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2023 15:08:10 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2f6c2ddb-b1a7-7152-bb7c-a5dcaf61ce36@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZMpMfQUktateeN1D@casper.infradead.org>
On 2023/8/2 20:30, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 02, 2023 at 05:53:44PM +0800, Kefeng Wang wrote:
>> -static int numamigrate_isolate_page(pg_data_t *pgdat, struct page *page)
>> +static int numamigrate_isolate_folio(pg_data_t *pgdat, struct folio *folio)
>> {
>> - int nr_pages = thp_nr_pages(page);
>> - int order = compound_order(page);
>> + int nr_pages = folio_nr_pages(folio);
>> + int order = folio_order(folio);
>>
>> - VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(order && !PageTransHuge(page), page);
>> + VM_BUG_ON_FOLIO(order && !folio_test_pmd_mappable(folio), folio);
>
> I don't know why we have this assertion. I would be inclined to delete
> it as part of generalising the migration code to handle arbitrary sizes
> of folio, rather than assert that we only support PMD size folios.
Ok, will drop it.
>
>> /* Do not migrate THP mapped by multiple processes */
>> - if (PageTransHuge(page) && total_mapcount(page) > 1)
>> + if (folio_test_pmd_mappable(folio) && folio_estimated_sharers(folio) > 1)
>> return 0;
>
> I don't know if this is the right logic. We've willing to move folios
> mapped by multiple processes, as long as they're smaller than PMD size,
> but once they get to PMD size they're magical and can't be moved?
It seems that the logical is introduced by commit 04fa5d6a6547 ("mm:
migrate: check page_count of THP before migrating") and refactor by
340ef3902cf2 ("mm: numa: cleanup flow of transhuge page migration"),
"Hugh Dickins pointed out that migrate_misplaced_transhuge_page() does
not check page_count before migrating like base page migration and
khugepage. He could not see why this was safe and he is right."
For now, there is no migrate_misplaced_transhuge_page() and base/thp
page migrate's path is unified, there is a check(for old/new kernel) in
migrate_misplaced_page(),
"Don't migrate file pages that are mapped in multiple processes
with execute permissions as they are probably shared libraries."
We could drop the above check in numamigrate_isolate_page(), but
according to 04fa5d6a6547, maybe disable migrate page shared by
multi-process during numa balance for both base/thp page.
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-08-03 7:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-08-02 9:53 [PATCH 0/4] mm: migrate: more folio conversion Kefeng Wang
2023-08-02 9:53 ` [PATCH 1/4] mm: migrate: use a folio in add_page_for_migration() Kefeng Wang
2023-08-02 12:21 ` Matthew Wilcox
2023-08-03 7:13 ` Kefeng Wang
2023-08-03 12:30 ` Matthew Wilcox
2023-08-04 1:45 ` Kefeng Wang
2023-08-04 2:42 ` Zi Yan
2023-08-04 5:54 ` Kefeng Wang
2023-08-07 12:20 ` Kefeng Wang
2023-08-07 18:45 ` Zi Yan
2023-08-09 12:37 ` Kefeng Wang
2023-08-09 20:53 ` Mike Kravetz
2023-08-09 22:44 ` Mike Kravetz
2023-08-10 1:49 ` Kefeng Wang
2023-08-10 16:29 ` Mike Kravetz
2023-08-15 3:58 ` Huang, Ying
2023-08-15 21:12 ` Mike Kravetz
2023-08-16 0:50 ` Kefeng Wang
2023-08-15 3:56 ` Huang, Ying
2023-08-15 13:49 ` Zi Yan
2023-08-15 20:39 ` Huang, Ying
2023-08-02 9:53 ` [PATCH 2/4] mm: migrate: convert numamigrate_isolate_page() to numamigrate_isolate_folio() Kefeng Wang
2023-08-02 12:30 ` Matthew Wilcox
2023-08-03 7:08 ` Kefeng Wang [this message]
2023-08-06 5:04 ` Hugh Dickins
2023-08-02 9:53 ` [PATCH 3/4] mm: migrate: make migrate_misplaced_page() to take a folio Kefeng Wang
2023-08-02 9:53 ` [PATCH 4/4] mm: migrate: use __folio_test_movable() Kefeng Wang
2023-08-02 12:37 ` Matthew Wilcox
2023-08-02 12:38 ` David Hildenbrand
2023-08-02 11:47 ` [PATCH 0/4] mm: migrate: more folio conversion David Hildenbrand
2023-08-02 12:38 ` Kefeng Wang
2023-08-03 9:34 ` David Hildenbrand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2f6c2ddb-b1a7-7152-bb7c-a5dcaf61ce36@huawei.com \
--to=wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=ying.huang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox