From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail143.messagelabs.com (mail143.messagelabs.com [216.82.254.35]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 589716B00EC for ; Wed, 13 May 2009 07:18:22 -0400 (EDT) Received: by gxk20 with SMTP id 20so1062376gxk.14 for ; Wed, 13 May 2009 04:18:38 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <87r5ytl0nn.fsf@basil.nowhere.org> References: <20090513172904.7234.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com> <87r5ytl0nn.fsf@basil.nowhere.org> Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 20:18:38 +0900 Message-ID: <2f11576a0905130418w1782f85j12cb938e92d256ff@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH] Kconfig: CONFIG_UNEVICTABLE_LRU move into EMBEDDED submenu From: KOSAKI Motohiro Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org To: Andi Kleen Cc: LKML , linux-mm , Andrew Morton , Lee Schermerhorn , Minchan@firstfloor.org List-ID: 2009/5/13 Andi Kleen : > KOSAKI Motohiro writes: > >> Subject: [PATCH] Kconfig: CONFIG_UNEVICTABLE_LRU move into EMBEDDED submenu >> >> Almost people always turn on CONFIG_UNEVICTABLE_LRU. this configuration is >> used only embedded people. >> Thus, moving it into embedded submenu is better. > > Is there are any reason it cannot be just made unconditional unless > CONFIG_MMU is disabled. It was never clear to me why this was a config > option at all. In past days, I proposed this. but Minchan found this config bloat kernel 7kb and he claim embedded guys should have selectable chance. I agreed it. Is this enough explanation? -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org