From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: by rv-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id f25so1447861rvb.26 for ; Sun, 26 Oct 2008 06:37:50 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <2f11576a0810260637q21eaec62q4e2662742541e771@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2008 22:37:50 +0900 From: "KOSAKI Motohiro" Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] lru_add_drain_all() don't use schedule_on_each_cpu() In-Reply-To: <1225019176.32713.5.camel@twins> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <2f11576a0810210851g6e0d86benef5d801871886dd7@mail.gmail.com> <2f11576a0810211018g5166c1byc182f1194cfdd45d@mail.gmail.com> <20081023235425.9C40.KOSAKI.MOTOHIRO@jp.fujitsu.com> <1225019176.32713.5.camel@twins> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Heiko Carstens , Nick Piggin , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Hugh Dickins , Andrew Morton , Linus Torvalds , Rik van Riel , Lee Schermerhorn , linux-mm@kvack.org, Christoph Lameter , Gautham Shenoy , Oleg Nesterov , Rusty Russell List-ID: Hi Peter, >> @@ -611,4 +613,8 @@ void __init swap_setup(void) >> #ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU >> hotcpu_notifier(cpu_swap_callback, 0); >> #endif >> + >> + vm_wq = create_workqueue("vm_work"); >> + BUG_ON(!vm_wq); >> + >> } > > While I really hate adding yet another per-cpu thread for this, I don't > see another way out atm. Can I ask the reason of your hate? if I don't know it, making improvement patch is very difficult to me. > Oleg, Rusty, ego, you lot were discussing a similar extra per-cpu > workqueue, can we merge these two? -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org