From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id f31so526577pyh.20 for ; Thu, 21 Aug 2008 00:18:00 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <2f11576a0808210018h157b0eddr1c327ecad8315cad@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2008 16:18:00 +0900 From: "KOSAKI Motohiro" Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 2/2] quicklist shouldn't be proportional to # of CPUs In-Reply-To: <20080821.001322.236658980.davem@davemloft.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20080820195021.12E7.KOSAKI.MOTOHIRO@jp.fujitsu.com> <20080820200709.12F0.KOSAKI.MOTOHIRO@jp.fujitsu.com> <20080820234615.258a9c04.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20080821.001322.236658980.davem@davemloft.net> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: David Miller Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, cl@linux-foundation.org, tokunaga.keiich@jp.fujitsu.com List-ID: >> sparc64 allmodconfig: >> >> mm/quicklist.c: In function `max_pages': >> mm/quicklist.c:44: error: invalid lvalue in unary `&' >> >> we seem to have a made a spectacular mess of cpumasks lately. > > It should explode similarly on x86, since it also defines node_to_cpumask() > as an inline function. > > IA64 seems to be one of the few platforms to define this as a macro > evaluating to the node-to-cpumask array entry, so it's clear what > platform Motohiro-san did build testing on :-) Thank you good advice. I don't have sparc64 machine but I can get borrowing x86 machine. So, I'll test on x86 today. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org