From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: by rv-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id f25so10904094rvb.26 for ; Tue, 24 Jun 2008 10:35:52 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <2f11576a0806241035p45a440e1gb798091ef39cffc8@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 02:35:51 +0900 From: "KOSAKI Motohiro" Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix to putback_lru_page()/unevictable page handling rework v3 In-Reply-To: <1214327987.6563.22.camel@lts-notebook> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20080621185408.E832.KOSAKI.MOTOHIRO@jp.fujitsu.com> <20080624184122.D838.KOSAKI.MOTOHIRO@jp.fujitsu.com> <1214327987.6563.22.camel@lts-notebook> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Lee Schermerhorn Cc: Andrew Morton , KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki , linux-mm , LKML , Rik van Riel List-ID: > 'lru' was not being set to 'UNEVICTABLE when page was, in fact, > unevictable [really "nonreclaimable" :-)], so retry would never > happen, and culled pages never counted. > > Also, redundant mem_cgroup_move_lists()--one with incorrect 'lru', > in the case of unevictable pages--messes up memcontroller tracking [I think]. indeed. sorry, I forgot to send this fix. Acked-by: KOSAKI Motohiro but I still happend panic on usex and nishimura-san's cpuset migration test. -> http://marc.info/?l=linux-mm&m=121375647720110&w=2 I'll investigate it tommorow. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org