From: "KOSAKI Motohiro" <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
To: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, lee.schermerhorn@hp.com,
linux-mm@kvack.org, eric.whitney@hp.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH -mm 13/25] Noreclaim LRU Infrastructure
Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2008 06:07:09 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2f11576a0806081407l5d26d229ye252ff378434e787@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080608163413.08d46427@bree.surriel.com>
>> > +#ifdef CONFIG_NORECLAIM_LRU
>> > + PG_noreclaim, /* Page is "non-reclaimable" */
>> > +#endif
>>
>> I fear that we're messing up the terminology here.
>>
>> Go into your 2.6.25 tree and do `grep -i reclaimable */*.c'. The term
>> already means a few different things, but in the vmscan context,
>> "reclaimable" means that the page is unreferenced, clean and can be
>> stolen. "reclaimable" also means a lot of other things, and we just
>> made that worse.
>>
>> Can we think of a new term which uniquely describes this new concept
>> and use that, rather than flogging the old horse?
>
> Want to reuse the BSD term "pinned" instead?
I like this term :)
but I afraid to somebody confuse Xen/KVM term's pinned page.
IOW, I guess somebody imazine from "pinned page" to below flag.
#define PG_pinned PG_owner_priv_1 /* Xen pinned pagetable */
I have no idea....
>> > +/**
>> > + * add_page_to_noreclaim_list
>> > + * @page: the page to be added to the noreclaim list
>> > + *
>> > + * Add page directly to its zone's noreclaim list. To avoid races with
>> > + * tasks that might be making the page reclaimble while it's not on the
>> > + * lru, we want to add the page while it's locked or otherwise "invisible"
>> > + * to other tasks. This is difficult to do when using the pagevec cache,
>> > + * so bypass that.
>> > + */
>>
>> How does a task "make a page reclaimable"? munlock()? fsync()?
>> exit()?
>>
>> Choice of terminology matters...
>
> Lee? Kosaki-san?
IFAIK, moving noreclaim list to reclaim list happend at below situation.
mlock'ed page
- all mlocked process exit.
- all mlocked process call munlock().
- page related vma vanished
(e.g. mumap, mmap, remap_file_page)
SHM_LOCKed page
- sysctl(SHM_UNLOCK) called.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-06-08 21:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20080606202838.390050172@redhat.com>
2008-06-06 20:28 ` Rik van Riel, Rik van Riel
2008-06-07 1:05 ` Andrew Morton
2008-06-08 20:34 ` Rik van Riel
2008-06-08 20:57 ` Andrew Morton
2008-06-08 21:32 ` Rik van Riel
2008-06-08 21:43 ` Ray Lee
2008-06-08 23:22 ` Andrew Morton
2008-06-08 23:34 ` Rik van Riel
2008-06-08 23:54 ` Andrew Morton
2008-06-09 0:56 ` Rik van Riel
2008-06-09 6:10 ` Andrew Morton
2008-06-09 13:44 ` Rik van Riel
2008-06-09 2:58 ` Rik van Riel
2008-06-09 5:44 ` Andrew Morton
2008-06-10 19:17 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-06-10 19:37 ` Rik van Riel
2008-06-10 21:33 ` Andrew Morton
2008-06-10 21:48 ` Andi Kleen
2008-06-10 22:05 ` Dave Hansen
2008-06-11 5:09 ` Paul Mundt
2008-06-11 6:16 ` Andrew Morton
2008-06-11 6:29 ` Paul Mundt
2008-06-11 12:06 ` Andi Kleen
2008-06-11 14:09 ` Removing node flags from page->flags was Re: [PATCH -mm 13/25] Noreclaim LRU Infrastructure II Andi Kleen
2008-06-11 19:03 ` [PATCH -mm 13/25] Noreclaim LRU Infrastructure Andy Whitcroft
2008-06-11 20:52 ` Andi Kleen
2008-06-11 23:25 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-06-08 22:03 ` Rik van Riel
2008-06-08 21:07 ` KOSAKI Motohiro [this message]
2008-06-10 20:09 ` Rik van Riel
2008-06-06 20:28 ` [PATCH -mm 15/25] Ramfs and Ram Disk pages are non-reclaimable Rik van Riel, Rik van Riel
2008-06-07 1:05 ` Andrew Morton
2008-06-08 4:32 ` Greg KH
2008-06-06 20:28 ` [PATCH -mm 17/25] Mlocked Pages " Rik van Riel, Rik van Riel
2008-06-07 1:07 ` Andrew Morton
2008-06-07 5:38 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-06-10 3:31 ` Nick Piggin
2008-06-10 12:50 ` Rik van Riel
2008-06-10 21:14 ` Rik van Riel
2008-06-10 21:43 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2008-06-10 21:57 ` Andrew Morton
2008-06-11 16:01 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2008-06-10 23:48 ` Rik van Riel
2008-06-11 15:29 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2008-06-11 1:00 ` Rik van Riel
2008-06-06 20:28 ` [PATCH -mm 19/25] Handle mlocked pages during map, remap, unmap Rik van Riel, Rik van Riel
2008-06-06 20:28 ` [PATCH -mm 21/25] Cull non-reclaimable pages in fault path Rik van Riel, Rik van Riel, Lee Schermerhorn
2008-06-06 20:29 ` [PATCH -mm 23/25] Noreclaim LRU scan sysctl Rik van Riel, Rik van Riel, Lee Schermerhorn
2008-06-06 20:29 ` [PATCH -mm 25/25] Noreclaim LRU and Mlocked Pages Documentation Rik van Riel, Rik van Riel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2f11576a0806081407l5d26d229ye252ff378434e787@mail.gmail.com \
--to=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=eric.whitney@hp.com \
--cc=lee.schermerhorn@hp.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox