From: Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>
To: Pratyush Yadav <pratyush@kernel.org>
Cc: Changyuan Lyu <changyuanl@google.com>,
rppt@kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, anthony.yznaga@oracle.com,
arnd@arndb.de, ashish.kalra@amd.com, benh@kernel.crashing.org,
bp@alien8.de, catalin.marinas@arm.com, corbet@lwn.net,
dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
dwmw2@infradead.org, ebiederm@xmission.com, graf@amazon.com,
hpa@zytor.com, jgowans@amazon.com, kexec@lists.infradead.org,
krzk@kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, luto@kernel.org,
mark.rutland@arm.com, mingo@redhat.com,
pasha.tatashin@soleen.com, pbonzini@redhat.com,
peterz@infradead.org, robh@kernel.org, rostedt@goodmis.org,
saravanak@google.com, skinsburskii@linux.microsoft.com,
tglx@linutronix.de, thomas.lendacky@amd.com, will@kernel.org,
x86@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 01/17] memblock: add MEMBLOCK_RSRV_KERN flag
Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2025 01:34:07 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2ege2jfbevtunhxsnutbzde7cqwgu5qbj4bbuw2umw7ke7ogcn@5wtskk4exzsi> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <mafs0h5w2lpqu.fsf@kernel.org>
Hello Pratyush,
On Mon, Oct 13, 2025 at 06:40:09PM +0200, Pratyush Yadav wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 13 2025, Pratyush Yadav wrote:
> >
> > I suppose this would be useful. I think enabling memblock debug prints
> > would also be helpful (using the "memblock=debug" commandline parameter)
> > if it doesn't impact your production environment too much.
>
> Actually, I think "memblock=debug" is going to be the more useful thing
> since it would also show what function allocated the overlapping range
> and the flags it was allocated with.
>
> On my qemu VM with KVM, this results in around 70 prints from memblock.
> So it adds a bit of extra prints but nothing that should be too
> disrupting I think. Plus, only at boot so the worst thing you get is
> slightly slower boot times.
Unfortunately this issue is happening on production systems, and I don't
have an easy way to reproduce it _yet_.
At the same time, "memblock=debug" has two problems:
1) It slows the boot time as you suggested. Boot time at large
environments is SUPER critical and time sensitive. It is a bit
weird, but it is common for machines in production to kexec
_thousands_ of times, and kexecing is considered downtime.
This would be useful if I find some hosts getting this issue, and
then I can easily enable the extra information to collect what
I need, but, this didn't pan out because the hosts I got
`memblock=debug` didn't collaborate.
2) "memblock=debug" is verbose for all cases, which also not necessary
the desired behaviour. I am more interested in only being verbose
when there is a known problem.
That said, my suggestion is to only dump extra information when something goes
wrong, not affecting the boot time neither boot verbosity.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-10-14 8:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-05-09 7:46 [PATCH v8 00/17] kexec: introduce Kexec HandOver (KHO) Changyuan Lyu
2025-05-09 7:46 ` [PATCH v8 01/17] memblock: add MEMBLOCK_RSRV_KERN flag Changyuan Lyu
2025-10-10 9:33 ` Breno Leitao
2025-10-13 14:59 ` Pratyush Yadav
2025-10-13 16:40 ` Pratyush Yadav
2025-10-14 8:34 ` Breno Leitao [this message]
2025-10-14 13:10 ` Pratyush Yadav
2025-11-05 10:18 ` Breno Leitao
2025-11-06 8:24 ` Mike Rapoport
2025-05-09 7:46 ` [PATCH v8 02/17] memblock: Add support for scratch memory Changyuan Lyu
2025-05-09 7:46 ` [PATCH v8 03/17] memblock: introduce memmap_init_kho_scratch() Changyuan Lyu
2025-05-09 7:46 ` [PATCH v8 04/17] kexec: add Kexec HandOver (KHO) generation helpers Changyuan Lyu
2025-05-09 7:46 ` [PATCH v8 05/17] kexec: add KHO parsing support Changyuan Lyu
2025-05-09 7:46 ` [PATCH v8 06/17] kexec: enable KHO support for memory preservation Changyuan Lyu
2025-05-09 7:46 ` [PATCH v8 07/17] kexec: add KHO support to kexec file loads Changyuan Lyu
2025-05-09 7:46 ` [PATCH v8 08/17] kexec: add config option for KHO Changyuan Lyu
2025-05-09 7:46 ` [PATCH v8 09/17] arm64: add KHO support Changyuan Lyu
2025-05-09 7:46 ` [PATCH v8 10/17] x86/setup: use memblock_reserve_kern for memory used by kernel Changyuan Lyu
2025-05-09 7:46 ` [PATCH v8 11/17] x86/kexec: add support for passing kexec handover (KHO) data Changyuan Lyu
2025-05-09 7:46 ` [PATCH v8 12/17] x86/e820: temporarily enable KHO scratch for memory below 1M Changyuan Lyu
2025-11-24 19:24 ` Usama Arif
2025-11-25 0:56 ` H. Peter Anvin
2025-11-25 12:23 ` Pratyush Yadav
2025-11-25 13:53 ` Mike Rapoport
2025-11-25 13:15 ` Pratyush Yadav
2025-11-25 13:50 ` Mike Rapoport
2025-11-25 18:47 ` Usama Arif
2025-11-26 6:14 ` Mike Rapoport
2025-11-26 7:25 ` Usama Arif
2025-11-25 14:31 ` Usama Arif
2025-11-25 14:39 ` Pratyush Yadav
2025-05-09 7:46 ` [PATCH v8 13/17] x86/boot: make sure KASLR does not step over KHO preserved memory Changyuan Lyu
2025-05-09 7:46 ` [PATCH v8 14/17] x86/Kconfig: enable kexec handover for 64 bits Changyuan Lyu
2025-05-09 7:46 ` [PATCH v8 15/17] memblock: add KHO support for reserve_mem Changyuan Lyu
2025-05-09 7:46 ` [PATCH v8 16/17] Documentation: add documentation for KHO Changyuan Lyu
2025-05-09 7:46 ` [PATCH v8 17/17] Documentation: KHO: Add memblock bindings Changyuan Lyu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2ege2jfbevtunhxsnutbzde7cqwgu5qbj4bbuw2umw7ke7ogcn@5wtskk4exzsi \
--to=leitao@debian.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=anthony.yznaga@oracle.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=ashish.kalra@amd.com \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=changyuanl@google.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=graf@amazon.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jgowans@amazon.com \
--cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=krzk@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=pasha.tatashin@soleen.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=pratyush@kernel.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=saravanak@google.com \
--cc=skinsburskii@linux.microsoft.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox