From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-13.5 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING,NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC653C433E1 for ; Mon, 13 Jul 2020 12:41:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97A812075B for ; Mon, 13 Jul 2020 12:41:45 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 97A812075B Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=huawei.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 138138D0005; Mon, 13 Jul 2020 08:41:45 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 0E97C8D0001; Mon, 13 Jul 2020 08:41:45 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id F3F9F8D0005; Mon, 13 Jul 2020 08:41:44 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0103.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.103]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF31D8D0001 for ; Mon, 13 Jul 2020 08:41:44 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin14.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay01.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 831E7180AD81F for ; Mon, 13 Jul 2020 12:41:44 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 77033014128.14.tree66_17131e826ee8 Received: from filter.hostedemail.com (10.5.16.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.16.251]) by smtpin14.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5137918229835 for ; Mon, 13 Jul 2020 12:41:44 +0000 (UTC) X-HE-Tag: tree66_17131e826ee8 X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 3805 Received: from huawei.com (szxga05-in.huawei.com [45.249.212.191]) by imf28.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Mon, 13 Jul 2020 12:41:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from DGGEMS408-HUB.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.60]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id C32079BA0D8FA8D4044F; Mon, 13 Jul 2020 20:41:38 +0800 (CST) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (10.174.186.75) by DGGEMS408-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.208) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.487.0; Mon, 13 Jul 2020 20:41:32 +0800 Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] arm64: tlb: add support for TLBI RANGE instructions To: Catalin Marinas , , , , , , CC: , , , , , , , , References: <20200710094420.517-1-yezhenyu2@huawei.com> <159440712962.27784.4664678472466095995.b4-ty@arm.com> <20200713122123.GC15829@gaia> From: Zhenyu Ye Message-ID: <2edcf1ce-38d4-82b2-e500-51f742cae357@huawei.com> Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2020 20:41:31 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20200713122123.GC15829@gaia> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gbk" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.174.186.75] X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 5137918229835 X-Spamd-Result: default: False [0.00 / 100.00] X-Rspamd-Server: rspam02 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: Hi Catalin, On 2020/7/13 20:21, Catalin Marinas wrote: > On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 08:11:19PM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote: >> On Fri, 10 Jul 2020 17:44:18 +0800, Zhenyu Ye wrote: >>> NOTICE: this series are based on the arm64 for-next/tlbi branch: >>> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/arm64/linux.git for-next/tlbi >>> >>> -- >>> ARMv8.4-TLBI provides TLBI invalidation instruction that apply to a >>> range of input addresses. This series add support for this feature. >>> >>> [...] >> >> Applied to arm64 (for-next/tlbi), thanks! >> >> [1/2] arm64: tlb: Detect the ARMv8.4 TLBI RANGE feature >> https://git.kernel.org/arm64/c/a2fd755f77ff >> [2/2] arm64: tlb: Use the TLBI RANGE feature in arm64 >> https://git.kernel.org/arm64/c/db34a081d273 > > I'm dropping these two patches from for-next/tlbi and for-next/core. > They need a check on whether binutils supports the new "tlbi rva*" > instructions, otherwise the build mail fail. > > I kept the latest incarnation of these patches on devel/tlbi-range for > reference. > Should we add a check for the binutils version? Just like: diff --git a/arch/arm64/Kconfig b/arch/arm64/Kconfig index fad573883e89..d5fb6567e0d2 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/Kconfig +++ b/arch/arm64/Kconfig @@ -1300,6 +1300,20 @@ config ARM64_AMU_EXTN correctly reflect reality. Most commonly, the value read will be 0, indicating that the counter is not enabled. +config ARM64_TLBI_RANGE + bool "Enable support for tlbi range feature" + default y + depends on AS_HAS_TLBI_RANGE + help + ARMv8.4-TLBI provides TLBI invalidation instruction that apply to a + range of input addresses. + + The feature introduces new assembly instructions, and they were + support when binutils >= 2.30. + +config AS_HAS_TLBI_RANGE + def_bool $(as-option, -Wa$(comma)-march=armv8.4-a) + endmenu menu "ARMv8.5 architectural features" Then uses the check in the loop: while (pages > 0) { if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM64_TLBI_RANGE) || !cpus_have_const_cap(ARM64_HAS_TLBI_RANGE) || If this is ok, I could send a new series soon. Thanks, Zhenyu