From: Lance Yang <lance.yang@linux.dev>
To: Dev Jain <dev.jain@arm.com>
Cc: ziy@nvidia.com, baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com,
Liam.Howlett@oracle.com, npache@redhat.com, ryan.roberts@arm.com,
baohua@kernel.org, lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com, david@redhat.com,
ioworker0@gmail.com, richard.weiyang@gmail.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
akpm@linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH mm-new 1/2] mm/khugepaged: optimize PTE scanning with if-else-if-else-if chain
Date: Sat, 4 Oct 2025 11:08:40 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2ecb9ba1-8801-42b8-9575-5add856d0441@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b8fc9ab7-a96f-4763-9432-8aa8c3c2a87d@arm.com>
On 2025/10/4 00:33, Dev Jain wrote:
>
> On 02/10/25 1:02 pm, Lance Yang wrote:
>> From: Lance Yang <lance.yang@linux.dev>
>>
>> As pointed out by Dev, the PTE checks for disjoint conditions in the
>> scanning loops can be optimized. is_swap_pte, (pte_none && is_zero_pfn),
>> and pte_uffd_wp are mutually exclusive.
>>
>> This patch refactors the loops in both __collapse_huge_page_isolate() and
>> hpage_collapse_scan_pmd() to use a continuous if-else-if-else-if chain
>> instead of separate if blocks.
>>
>> Also, this is a preparatory step to make it easier to merge the
>> almost-duplicated scanning logic in these two functions, as suggested
>> by David.
>>
>> Suggested-by: Dev Jain <dev.jain@arm.com>
>> Suggested-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Lance Yang <lance.yang@linux.dev>
>> ---
>> mm/khugepaged.c | 12 ++++--------
>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/mm/khugepaged.c b/mm/khugepaged.c
>> index f4f57ba69d72..808523f92c7b 100644
>> --- a/mm/khugepaged.c
>> +++ b/mm/khugepaged.c
>> @@ -548,8 +548,7 @@ static int __collapse_huge_page_isolate(struct
>> vm_area_struct *vma,
>> for (_pte = pte; _pte < pte + HPAGE_PMD_NR;
>> _pte++, addr += PAGE_SIZE) {
>> pte_t pteval = ptep_get(_pte);
>> - if (pte_none(pteval) || (pte_present(pteval) &&
>> - is_zero_pfn(pte_pfn(pteval)))) {
>> + if (pte_none(pteval) || is_zero_pfn(pte_pfn(pteval))) {
>
> Should have mentioned in the description that pte_present() is not required
> here, so removing it.
Yep, got it.
>
> Reviewed-by: Dev Jain <dev.jain@arm.com>
Cheers,
Lance
>
>> ++none_or_zero;
>> if (!userfaultfd_armed(vma) &&
>> (!cc->is_khugepaged ||
>> @@ -560,12 +559,10 @@ static int __collapse_huge_page_isolate(struct
>> vm_area_struct *vma,
>> count_vm_event(THP_SCAN_EXCEED_NONE_PTE);
>> goto out;
>> }
>> - }
>> - if (!pte_present(pteval)) {
>> + } else if (!pte_present(pteval)) {
>> result = SCAN_PTE_NON_PRESENT;
>> goto out;
>> - }
>> - if (pte_uffd_wp(pteval)) {
>> + } else if (pte_uffd_wp(pteval)) {
>> result = SCAN_PTE_UFFD_WP;
>> goto out;
>> }
>> @@ -1316,8 +1313,7 @@ static int hpage_collapse_scan_pmd(struct
>> mm_struct *mm,
>> count_vm_event(THP_SCAN_EXCEED_SWAP_PTE);
>> goto out_unmap;
>> }
>> - }
>> - if (pte_uffd_wp(pteval)) {
>> + } else if (pte_uffd_wp(pteval)) {
>> /*
>> * Don't collapse the page if any of the small
>> * PTEs are armed with uffd write protection.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-10-04 3:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-10-02 7:32 [PATCH mm-new 0/2] mm/khugepaged: refactor and merge PTE scanning logic Lance Yang
2025-10-02 7:32 ` [PATCH mm-new 1/2] mm/khugepaged: optimize PTE scanning with if-else-if-else-if chain Lance Yang
2025-10-03 13:21 ` Wei Yang
2025-10-03 16:33 ` Dev Jain
2025-10-04 3:08 ` Lance Yang [this message]
2025-10-03 17:04 ` Zi Yan
2025-10-02 7:32 ` [PATCH mm-new 2/2] mm/khugepaged: merge PTE scanning logic into a new helper Lance Yang
2025-10-03 17:05 ` Dev Jain
2025-10-04 3:03 ` Lance Yang
2025-10-04 4:42 ` Dev Jain
2025-10-04 5:24 ` Lance Yang
2025-10-04 9:42 ` Wei Yang
2025-10-04 13:11 ` Dev Jain
2025-10-05 2:35 ` Lance Yang
2025-10-05 2:38 ` Zi Yan
2025-10-05 2:44 ` Lance Yang
2025-10-03 17:11 ` Zi Yan
2025-10-04 3:06 ` Lance Yang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2ecb9ba1-8801-42b8-9575-5add856d0441@linux.dev \
--to=lance.yang@linux.dev \
--cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=baohua@kernel.org \
--cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=dev.jain@arm.com \
--cc=ioworker0@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
--cc=npache@redhat.com \
--cc=richard.weiyang@gmail.com \
--cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
--cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox