From: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
To: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
"C.Wehrmeyer" <c.wehrmeyer@gmx.de>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: PROBLEM: Remapping hugepages mappings causes kernel to return EINVAL
Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2017 10:06:01 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2dad26cf-f37c-aada-053a-957c59c9858d@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b27c7b12-beb3-abdd-fde1-3d48fa73ea81@suse.cz>
On 10/27/2017 07:29 AM, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> On 10/24/2017 09:41 AM, C.Wehrmeyer wrote:
>> On 2017-10-23 20:02, Michal Hocko wrote:
>>> On Mon 23-10-17 19:52:27, C.Wehrmeyer wrote:
>>> [...]
>>
>> 1. Provide a flag to mmap, which might be something different from
>> MAP_HUGETLB. After all your question revolved merely around properly
>> aligned pages - we don't want to *force* the kernel to reserve
>> hugepages, we just want it to provide the proper alignment in this case.
>> That wouldn't be very transparent, but it would be the easiest route to
>> go (and mmap already kind-of supports such a thing).
>
> Maybe just have mmap() detect that the requested size is a multiple of
> huge page size, and then align it automatically? I.e. a heuristic that
> should work in 99% of the cases?
We already do this for DAX (see thp_get_unmapped_area). So, not much
code to write. But could potentially fragment address spaces more.
We could also check to determine if the system/process/mapping is even
THP enabled before doing the alignment.
I like the idea, but still am concerned about fragmentation. In addition,
even though applications shouldn't care where new mappings are placed it
would not surprise me that such a change will be noticeable to some.
--
Mike Kravetz
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-10-27 17:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <93684e4b-9e60-ef3a-ba62-5719fdf7cff9@gmx.de>
2017-10-19 7:34 ` C.Wehrmeyer
2017-10-20 22:42 ` Mike Kravetz
2017-10-23 11:42 ` Michal Hocko
2017-10-23 12:22 ` C.Wehrmeyer
2017-10-23 12:41 ` Michal Hocko
2017-10-23 14:00 ` C.Wehrmeyer
2017-10-23 16:13 ` Michal Hocko
2017-10-23 16:46 ` C.Wehrmeyer
2017-10-23 16:57 ` Michal Hocko
2017-10-23 17:52 ` C.Wehrmeyer
2017-10-23 18:02 ` Michal Hocko
2017-10-24 7:41 ` C.Wehrmeyer
2017-10-24 8:12 ` Michal Hocko
2017-10-24 8:32 ` C.Wehrmeyer
2017-10-27 14:29 ` Vlastimil Babka
2017-10-27 17:06 ` Mike Kravetz [this message]
2017-10-27 17:31 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2017-10-23 18:51 ` Mike Kravetz
2017-10-24 8:09 ` C.Wehrmeyer
2017-10-07 1:58 C.Wehrmeyer
2017-10-09 16:47 ` Mike Kravetz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2dad26cf-f37c-aada-053a-957c59c9858d@oracle.com \
--to=mike.kravetz@oracle.com \
--cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=c.wehrmeyer@gmx.de \
--cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox