From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-oi0-f71.google.com (mail-oi0-f71.google.com [209.85.218.71]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 666986B025F for ; Fri, 18 Aug 2017 10:48:58 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-oi0-f71.google.com with SMTP id z19so12733230oia.13 for ; Fri, 18 Aug 2017 07:48:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com. [194.213.3.17]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id f8si4739317oib.77.2017.08.18.07.48.57 for (version=TLS1 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 18 Aug 2017 07:48:57 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [kernel-hardening] [RFC] memory allocations in genalloc References: <299c22f9-2e34-36dc-a6da-22eadbc0a59d@huawei.com> From: Igor Stoppa Message-ID: <2d087abd-1bf4-55aa-ac92-67a9b8f9d177@huawei.com> Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2017 17:47:16 +0300 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Laura Abbott , Jes Sorensen Cc: Michal Hocko , James Morris , Jerome Glisse , Paul Moore , LKML , Linux-MM , "kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com" , linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org Hi, On 18/08/17 16:57, Laura Abbott wrote: > Again, if you have a specific patch or > proposal this would be easier to review. yes, I'm preparing it and will send it out soon, but it was somehow surprising to me that it was chosen to implement free with the size parameter. It made me think that I was overlooking some obvious reason behind the choice :-S -- thanks for answering, igor -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org