From: Pedro Falcato <pfalcato@suse.de>
To: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
David Hildenbrand <david@kernel.org>,
"Liam R . Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@oracle.com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>,
Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Chris Mason <clm@meta.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH mm-hotfixes] mm: do not copy page tables unnecessarily for VM_UFFD_WP
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2026 11:35:08 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2cfknurph2lkbfht6nqajt74fujwompjgmkhr3muiiv3snylhr@ufijpjud2rac> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260114110006.1047071-1-lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com>
On Wed, Jan 14, 2026 at 11:00:06AM +0000, Lorenzo Stoakes wrote:
> Commit ab04b530e7e8 ("mm: introduce copy-on-fork VMAs and make
> VM_MAYBE_GUARD one") aggregates flags checks in vma_needs_copy(), including
> VM_UFFD_WP.
>
> However in doing so, it incorrectly performed this check against
> src_vma. This check was done on the assumption that all relevant flags are
> copied upon fork.
>
> However the userfaultfd logic is very innovative in that it implements
> custom logic on fork in dup_userfaultfd(), including a rather well hidden
> case where lacking UFFD_FEATURE_EVENT_FORK causes VM_UFFD_WP to not be
> propagated to the destination VMA.
>
> And indeed, vma_needs_copy(), prior to this patch, did check this property
> on dst_vma, not src_vma.
>
> Since all the other relevant flags are copied on fork, we can simply fix
> this by checking against dst_vma.
>
> While we're here, we fix a comment against VM_COPY_ON_FORK (noting that it
> did indeed already reference dst_vma) to make it abundantly clear that we
> must check against the destination VMA.
>
> Reported-by: Chris Mason <clm@meta.com>
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260113231257.3002271-1-clm@meta.com/
> Fixes: ab04b530e7e8 ("mm: introduce copy-on-fork VMAs and make VM_MAYBE_GUARD one")
> Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com>
Acked-by: Pedro Falcato <pfalcato@suse.de>
> ---
> include/linux/mm.h | 6 +++++-
> mm/memory.c | 6 +++++-
> 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/mm.h b/include/linux/mm.h
> index cb3de0c73d03..44a2a9c0a92f 100644
> --- a/include/linux/mm.h
> +++ b/include/linux/mm.h
> @@ -609,7 +609,11 @@ enum {
> /*
> * Flags which should result in page tables being copied on fork. These are
> * flags which indicate that the VMA maps page tables which cannot be
> - * reconsistuted upon page fault, so necessitate page table copying upon
> + * reconsistuted upon page fault, so necessitate page table copying upon fork.
> + *
> + * Note that these flags should be compared with the DESTINATION VMA not the
> + * source, as VM_UFFD_WP may not be propagated to destination, while all other
> + * flags will be.
> *
> * VM_PFNMAP / VM_MIXEDMAP - These contain kernel-mapped data which cannot be
> * reasonably reconstructed on page fault.
> diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c
> index 4b0790c8fa48..2839000cd26f 100644
> --- a/mm/memory.c
> +++ b/mm/memory.c
> @@ -1465,7 +1465,11 @@ copy_p4d_range(struct vm_area_struct *dst_vma, struct vm_area_struct *src_vma,
> static bool
> vma_needs_copy(struct vm_area_struct *dst_vma, struct vm_area_struct *src_vma)
> {
> - if (src_vma->vm_flags & VM_COPY_ON_FORK)
> + /*
> + * We check against dst_vma as while sane VMA flags will have been
s/sane/most/?
I understand you're annoyed but perhaps we should leave this out of the code
comments themselves :)
> + * copied, VM_UFFD_WP may be set only on dst_vma.
> + */
> + if (dst_vma->vm_flags & VM_COPY_ON_FORK)
> return true;
> /*
> * The presence of an anon_vma indicates an anonymous VMA has page
> --
> 2.52.0
--
Pedro
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-01-14 11:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-01-14 11:00 Lorenzo Stoakes
2026-01-14 11:14 ` David Hildenbrand (Red Hat)
2026-01-14 11:35 ` Pedro Falcato [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2cfknurph2lkbfht6nqajt74fujwompjgmkhr3muiiv3snylhr@ufijpjud2rac \
--to=pfalcato@suse.de \
--cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=clm@meta.com \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox