From: Tal Zussman <tz2294@columbia.edu>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
"Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@infradead.org>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>,
"Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>,
Carlos Maiolino <cem@kernel.org>,
Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: Dave Chinner <dgc@kernel.org>,
Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>,
Gao Xiang <hsiangkao@linux.alibaba.com>,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/8] RFC: use a TASK_FIFO kthread for read completion support
Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2026 15:06:47 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2cdaa767-c071-4e84-b9d7-1c944407f5bb@columbia.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260409160243.1008358-9-hch@lst.de>
On 4/9/26 12:02 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Commit 3fffb589b9a6 ("erofs: add per-cpu threads for decompression as an
> option") explains why workqueue aren't great for low-latency completion
> handling. Switch to a per-cpu kthread to handle it instead. This code
> is based on the erofs code in the above commit, but further simplified
> by directly using a kthread instead of a kthread_work.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> ---
> block/bio.c | 117 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
> 1 file changed, 65 insertions(+), 52 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/block/bio.c b/block/bio.c
> index 88d191455762..6a993fb129a0 100644
> --- a/block/bio.c
> +++ b/block/bio.c
> @@ -19,7 +19,7 @@
> #include <linux/blk-crypto.h>
> #include <linux/xarray.h>
> #include <linux/kmemleak.h>
> -#include <linux/llist.h>
> +#include <linux/freezer.h>
Why freezer.h and not kthread.h?
> #include <trace/events/block.h>
> #include "blk.h"
> @@ -1718,51 +1718,83 @@ void bio_check_pages_dirty(struct bio *bio)
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(bio_check_pages_dirty);
>
> struct bio_complete_batch {
> - struct llist_head list;
If we go with this approach, we should remove the newly-added bi_llist from
struct bio too.
> - struct delayed_work work;
> - int cpu;
> + spinlock_t lock;
> + struct bio_list bios;
> + struct task_struct *worker;
> };
>
> static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct bio_complete_batch, bio_complete_batch);
> -static struct workqueue_struct *bio_complete_wq;
>
> -static void bio_complete_work_fn(struct work_struct *w)
> +static bool bio_try_complete_batch(struct bio_complete_batch *batch)
> {
> - struct delayed_work *dw = to_delayed_work(w);
> - struct bio_complete_batch *batch =
> - container_of(dw, struct bio_complete_batch, work);
> - struct llist_node *node;
> - struct bio *bio, *next;
> + struct bio_list bios;
> + unsigned long flags;
> + struct bio *bio;
>
> - do {
> - node = llist_del_all(&batch->list);
> - if (!node)
> - break;
> + spin_lock_irqsave(&batch->lock, flags);
> + bios = batch->bios;
> + bio_list_init(&batch->bios);
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&batch->lock, flags);
>
> - node = llist_reverse_order(node);
> - llist_for_each_entry_safe(bio, next, node, bi_llist)
> - bio->bi_end_io(bio);
> + if (bio_list_empty(&bios))
> + return false;
>
> - if (need_resched()) {
> - if (!llist_empty(&batch->list))
> - mod_delayed_work_on(batch->cpu,
> - bio_complete_wq,
> - &batch->work, 0);
> - break;
> - }
> - } while (1);
> + __set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
> + while ((bio = bio_list_pop(&bios)))
> + bio->bi_end_io(bio);
> + return true;
> +}
> +
> +static int bio_complete_thread(void *private)
> +{
> + struct bio_complete_batch *batch = private;
> +
> + for (;;) {
> + set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
> + if (!bio_try_complete_batch(batch))
> + schedule();
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> }
>
> void __bio_complete_in_task(struct bio *bio)
> {
> - struct bio_complete_batch *batch = this_cpu_ptr(&bio_complete_batch);
> + struct bio_complete_batch *batch;
> + unsigned long flags;
> + bool wake;
> +
> + get_cpu();
> + batch = this_cpu_ptr(&bio_complete_batch);
> + spin_lock_irqsave(&batch->lock, flags);
> + wake = bio_list_empty(&batch->bios);
> + bio_list_add(&batch->bios, bio);
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&batch->lock, flags);
> + put_cpu();
>
> - if (llist_add(&bio->bi_llist, &batch->list))
> - mod_delayed_work_on(batch->cpu, bio_complete_wq,
> - &batch->work, 1);
> + if (wake)
> + wake_up_process(batch->worker);
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__bio_complete_in_task);
>
> +static void __init bio_complete_batch_init(int cpu)
> +{
> + struct bio_complete_batch *batch =
> + per_cpu_ptr(&bio_complete_batch, cpu);
> + struct task_struct *worker;
> +
> + worker = kthread_create_on_cpu(bio_complete_thread,
> + per_cpu_ptr(&bio_complete_batch, cpu),
> + cpu, "bio_worker/%u");
> + if (IS_ERR(worker))
> + panic("bio: can't create kthread_work");
> + sched_set_fifo_low(worker);
> +
> + spin_lock_init(&batch->lock);
> + bio_list_init(&batch->bios);
> + batch->worker = worker;
> +}
> +
> static inline bool bio_remaining_done(struct bio *bio)
> {
> /*
> @@ -2028,16 +2060,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(bioset_init);
> */
> static int bio_complete_batch_cpu_dead(unsigned int cpu)
> {
> - struct bio_complete_batch *batch =
> - per_cpu_ptr(&bio_complete_batch, cpu);
> - struct llist_node *node;
> - struct bio *bio, *next;
> -
> - node = llist_del_all(&batch->list);
> - node = llist_reverse_order(node);
> - llist_for_each_entry_safe(bio, next, node, bi_llist)
> - bio->bi_end_io(bio);
> -
> + bio_try_complete_batch(per_cpu_ptr(&bio_complete_batch, cpu));
> return 0;
> }
>
> @@ -2055,18 +2078,8 @@ static int __init init_bio(void)
> SLAB_HWCACHE_ALIGN | SLAB_PANIC, NULL);
> }
>
> - for_each_possible_cpu(i) {
> - struct bio_complete_batch *batch =
> - per_cpu_ptr(&bio_complete_batch, i);
> -
> - init_llist_head(&batch->list);
> - INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&batch->work, bio_complete_work_fn);
> - batch->cpu = i;
> - }
> -
> - bio_complete_wq = alloc_workqueue("bio_complete", WQ_MEM_RECLAIM, 0);
> - if (!bio_complete_wq)
> - panic("bio: can't allocate bio_complete workqueue\n");
> + for_each_possible_cpu(i)
> + bio_complete_batch_init(i);
>
> cpuhp_setup_state(CPUHP_BP_PREPARE_DYN, "block/bio:complete:dead",
> NULL, bio_complete_batch_cpu_dead);
> --
> 2.47.3
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-09 19:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-09 16:02 bio completion in task enhancements / experiments Christoph Hellwig
2026-04-09 16:02 ` [PATCH 1/8] block: add BIO_COMPLETE_IN_TASK for task-context completion Christoph Hellwig
2026-04-09 16:02 ` [PATCH 2/8] iomap: use BIO_COMPLETE_IN_TASK for dropbehind writeback Christoph Hellwig
2026-04-09 16:02 ` [PATCH 3/8] block: enable RWF_DONTCACHE for block devices Christoph Hellwig
2026-04-09 16:02 ` [PATCH 4/8] FOLD: block: change the defer in task context interface to be procedural Christoph Hellwig
2026-04-09 20:18 ` Matthew Wilcox
2026-04-09 16:02 ` [PATCH 5/8] FOLD: don't use in_task() to decide for offloading Christoph Hellwig
2026-04-09 16:02 ` [PATCH 6/8] iomap: use bio_complete_in_task for buffered read errors Christoph Hellwig
2026-04-09 16:02 ` [PATCH 7/8] iomap: use bio_complete_in_task for buffered write completions Christoph Hellwig
2026-04-09 16:02 ` [PATCH 8/8] RFC: use a TASK_FIFO kthread for read completion support Christoph Hellwig
2026-04-09 19:06 ` Tal Zussman [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2cdaa767-c071-4e84-b9d7-1c944407f5bb@columbia.edu \
--to=tz2294@columbia.edu \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=cem@kernel.org \
--cc=dgc@kernel.org \
--cc=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=hsiangkao@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox