From: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
To: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>,
<akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: <ziy@nvidia.com>, <william.kucharski@oracle.com>,
<willy@infradead.org>, <yang.shi@linux.alibaba.com>,
<aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>, <rcampbell@nvidia.com>,
<songliubraving@fb.com>, <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>,
<riel@surriel.com>, <hannes@cmpxchg.org>, <minchan@kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] mm/huge_memory.c: use page->deferred_list
Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2021 16:23:21 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2cda7d1a-d769-2635-24ce-928e33d6bfcc@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e326f0c6-a4dc-6788-7be7-a175c47b2249@arm.com>
On 2021/4/28 11:07, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
>
> On 4/27/21 7:02 PM, Miaohe Lin wrote:
>> Now that we can represent the location of ->deferred_list instead of
>> ->mapping + ->index, make use of it to improve readability.
>
> Could you please explain how page->deferred_list and page->mapping
> are interchangeable here ?
It's because there is a union in struct page:
union {
struct {
struct list_head lru;
struct address_space *mapping;
pgoff_t index;
unsigned long private;
};
struct {
unsigned long _compound_pad_1;
atomic_t hpage_pinned_refcount;
struct list_head *deferred_list*;
};
};
And initially there is no deferred_list and it's added via commit 66a6ffd2af42 ("mm: combine first
three unions in struct page"). Also commit fa3015b7eed5 ("mm: use page->deferred_list") did the similar
cleanup. Am I expected to add these to the commit log?
Many thanks.
>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
>> ---
>> mm/huge_memory.c | 4 ++--
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/mm/huge_memory.c b/mm/huge_memory.c
>> index 63ed6b25deaa..76ca1eb2a223 100644
>> --- a/mm/huge_memory.c
>> +++ b/mm/huge_memory.c
>> @@ -2868,7 +2868,7 @@ static unsigned long deferred_split_scan(struct shrinker *shrink,
>> spin_lock_irqsave(&ds_queue->split_queue_lock, flags);
>> /* Take pin on all head pages to avoid freeing them under us */
>> list_for_each_safe(pos, next, &ds_queue->split_queue) {
>> - page = list_entry((void *)pos, struct page, mapping);
>> + page = list_entry((void *)pos, struct page, deferred_list);
>> page = compound_head(page);
>> if (get_page_unless_zero(page)) {
>> list_move(page_deferred_list(page), &list);
>> @@ -2883,7 +2883,7 @@ static unsigned long deferred_split_scan(struct shrinker *shrink,
>> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ds_queue->split_queue_lock, flags);
>>
>> list_for_each_safe(pos, next, &list) {
>> - page = list_entry((void *)pos, struct page, mapping);
>> + page = list_entry((void *)pos, struct page, deferred_list);
>> if (!trylock_page(page))
>> goto next;
>> /* split_huge_page() removes page from list on success */
>>
> .
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-04-28 8:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-04-27 13:32 [PATCH 0/5] Cleanup and fixup for huge_memory Miaohe Lin
2021-04-27 13:32 ` [PATCH 1/5] mm/huge_memory.c: remove dedicated macro HPAGE_CACHE_INDEX_MASK Miaohe Lin
2021-04-27 20:57 ` Yang Shi
2021-04-28 3:04 ` Anshuman Khandual
2021-04-27 13:32 ` [PATCH 2/5] mm/huge_memory.c: use page->deferred_list Miaohe Lin
2021-04-27 20:46 ` Yang Shi
2021-04-28 3:07 ` Anshuman Khandual
2021-04-28 8:23 ` Miaohe Lin [this message]
2021-04-27 13:32 ` [PATCH 3/5] mm/huge_memory.c: add missing read-only THP checking in transparent_hugepage_enabled() Miaohe Lin
2021-04-27 21:03 ` Yang Shi
2021-04-28 2:06 ` Miaohe Lin
2021-04-28 16:21 ` Yang Shi
2021-04-29 2:00 ` Miaohe Lin
2021-04-27 13:32 ` [PATCH 4/5] mm/huge_memory.c: remove unnecessary tlb_remove_page_size() for huge zero pmd Miaohe Lin
2021-04-27 13:32 ` [PATCH 5/5] mm/huge_memory.c: don't discard hugepage if other processes are mapping it Miaohe Lin
2021-04-27 21:22 ` Yang Shi
2021-04-28 3:10 ` [PATCH 0/5] Cleanup and fixup for huge_memory Anshuman Khandual
2021-04-28 8:32 ` Miaohe Lin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2cda7d1a-d769-2635-24ce-928e33d6bfcc@huawei.com \
--to=linmiaohe@huawei.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=minchan@kernel.org \
--cc=rcampbell@nvidia.com \
--cc=riel@surriel.com \
--cc=songliubraving@fb.com \
--cc=william.kucharski@oracle.com \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=yang.shi@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox