From: Lance Yang <lance.yang@linux.dev>
To: Dev Jain <dev.jain@arm.com>, akpm@linux-foundation.org
Cc: ryan.roberts@arm.com, david@redhat.com, willy@infradead.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
catalin.marinas@arm.com, will@kernel.org,
Liam.Howlett@oracle.com, lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com,
vbabka@suse.cz, jannh@google.com, anshuman.khandual@arm.com,
peterx@redhat.com, joey.gouly@arm.com, ioworker0@gmail.com,
baohua@kernel.org, kevin.brodsky@arm.com,
quic_zhenhuah@quicinc.com, christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu,
yangyicong@hisilicon.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
namit@vmware.com, hughd@google.com, yang@os.amperecomputing.com,
ziy@nvidia.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] Optimize mprotect for large folios
Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2025 21:31:40 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2c70d515-f02e-477a-afc5-d3a25f6c9c0d@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250428120414.12101-1-dev.jain@arm.com>
I'm hitting the following compilation errors after applying this patch
series:
In file included from ./include/linux/kasan.h:37,
from ./include/linux/slab.h:260,
from ./include/linux/crypto.h:19,
from arch/x86/kernel/asm-offsets.c:9:
./include/linux/pgtable.h: In function ‘modify_prot_start_ptes’:
./include/linux/pgtable.h:905:15: error: implicit declaration of
function ‘ptep_modify_prot_start’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
905 | pte = ptep_modify_prot_start(vma, addr, ptep);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
./include/linux/pgtable.h:905:15: error: incompatible types when
assigning to type ‘pte_t’ from type ‘int’
./include/linux/pgtable.h:909:27: error: incompatible types when
assigning to type ‘pte_t’ from type ‘int’
909 | tmp_pte = ptep_modify_prot_start(vma, addr, ptep);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
./include/linux/pgtable.h: In function ‘modify_prot_commit_ptes’:
./include/linux/pgtable.h:925:17: error: implicit declaration of
function ‘ptep_modify_prot_commit’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
925 | ptep_modify_prot_commit(vma, addr, ptep,
old_pte, pte);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
./include/linux/pgtable.h: At top level:
./include/linux/pgtable.h:1360:21: error: conflicting types for
‘ptep_modify_prot_start’; have ‘pte_t(struct vm_area_struct *, long
unsigned int, pte_t *)’
1360 | static inline pte_t ptep_modify_prot_start(struct
vm_area_struct *vma,
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
./include/linux/pgtable.h:905:15: note: previous implicit declaration of
‘ptep_modify_prot_start’ with type ‘int()’
905 | pte = ptep_modify_prot_start(vma, addr, ptep);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
./include/linux/pgtable.h:1371:20: warning: conflicting types for
‘ptep_modify_prot_commit’; have ‘void(struct vm_area_struct *, long
unsigned int, pte_t *, pte_t, pte_t)’
1371 | static inline void ptep_modify_prot_commit(struct
vm_area_struct *vma,
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
./include/linux/pgtable.h:1371:20: error: static declaration of
‘ptep_modify_prot_commit’ follows non-static declaration
./include/linux/pgtable.h:925:17: note: previous implicit declaration of
‘ptep_modify_prot_commit’ with type ‘void(struct vm_area_struct *, long
unsigned int, pte_t *, pte_t, pte_t)’
925 | ptep_modify_prot_commit(vma, addr, ptep,
old_pte, pte);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
make[2]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:98: arch/x86/kernel/asm-offsets.s]
Error 1
make[1]: ***
[/home/runner/work/mm-test-robot/mm-test-robot/linux/Makefile:1280:
prepare0] Error 2
make: *** [Makefile:248: __sub-make] Error 2
Based on:
mm-unstable b18dec6a6ad3d051dadc3c16fb838e4abddf8d3c ("mm/numa: remove
unnecessary local variable in alloc_node_data()")
Thanks,
Lance
On 2025/4/28 20:04, Dev Jain wrote:
> This patchset optimizes the mprotect() system call for large folios
> by PTE-batching.
>
> We use the following test cases to measure performance, mprotect()'ing
> the mapped memory to read-only then read-write 40 times:
>
> Test case 1: Mapping 1G of memory, touching it to get PMD-THPs, then
> pte-mapping those THPs
> Test case 2: Mapping 1G of memory with 64K mTHPs
> Test case 3: Mapping 1G of memory with 4K pages
>
> Average execution time on arm64, Apple M3:
> Before the patchset:
> T1: 7.9 seconds T2: 7.9 seconds T3: 4.2 seconds
>
> After the patchset:
> T1: 2.1 seconds T2: 2.2 seconds T3: 4.2 seconds
>
> Observing T1/T2 and T3 before the patchset, we also remove the regression
> introduced by ptep_get() on a contpte block. And, for large folios we get
> an almost 276% performance improvement.
>
> Dev Jain (7):
> mm: Refactor code in mprotect
> mm: Optimize mprotect() by batch-skipping PTEs
> mm: Add batched versions of ptep_modify_prot_start/commit
> arm64: Add batched version of ptep_modify_prot_start
> arm64: Add batched version of ptep_modify_prot_commit
> mm: Batch around can_change_pte_writable()
> mm: Optimize mprotect() through PTE-batching
>
> arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h | 10 ++
> arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c | 21 +++-
> include/linux/mm.h | 4 +-
> include/linux/pgtable.h | 42 ++++++++
> mm/gup.c | 2 +-
> mm/huge_memory.c | 4 +-
> mm/memory.c | 6 +-
> mm/mprotect.c | 163 +++++++++++++++++++++----------
> mm/pgtable-generic.c | 16 ++-
> 9 files changed, 198 insertions(+), 70 deletions(-)
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-28 13:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-28 12:04 Dev Jain
2025-04-28 12:04 ` [PATCH 1/7] mm: Refactor code in mprotect Dev Jain
2025-04-28 12:04 ` [PATCH 2/7] mm: Optimize mprotect() by batch-skipping PTEs Dev Jain
2025-04-28 12:04 ` [PATCH 3/7] mm: Add batched versions of ptep_modify_prot_start/commit Dev Jain
2025-04-28 12:04 ` [PATCH 4/7] arm64: Add batched version of ptep_modify_prot_start Dev Jain
2025-04-28 18:06 ` Zi Yan
2025-04-29 4:44 ` Dev Jain
2025-04-28 12:04 ` [PATCH 5/7] arm64: Add batched version of ptep_modify_prot_commit Dev Jain
2025-04-28 12:04 ` [PATCH 6/7] mm: Batch around can_change_pte_writable() Dev Jain
2025-04-28 12:50 ` Lance Yang
2025-04-28 12:59 ` Dev Jain
2025-04-28 13:23 ` Lance Yang
2025-04-29 4:59 ` Dev Jain
2025-04-28 13:16 ` Lance Yang
2025-04-28 15:54 ` Lance Yang
2025-04-28 12:04 ` [PATCH 7/7] mm: Optimize mprotect() through PTE-batching Dev Jain
2025-04-28 12:52 ` [PATCH 0/7] Optimize mprotect for large folios Dev Jain
2025-04-28 13:31 ` Lance Yang [this message]
2025-04-29 4:40 ` Dev Jain
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2c70d515-f02e-477a-afc5-d3a25f6c9c0d@linux.dev \
--to=lance.yang@linux.dev \
--cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
--cc=baohua@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=dev.jain@arm.com \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=ioworker0@gmail.com \
--cc=jannh@google.com \
--cc=joey.gouly@arm.com \
--cc=kevin.brodsky@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
--cc=namit@vmware.com \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=quic_zhenhuah@quicinc.com \
--cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=yang@os.amperecomputing.com \
--cc=yangyicong@hisilicon.com \
--cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox