From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
To: Dmitry Ilvokhin <d@ilvokhin.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Boqun Feng <boqun@kernel.org>, Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>,
Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@alpha.franken.de>,
Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>,
Ajay Kaher <ajay.kaher@broadcom.com>,
Alexey Makhalov <alexey.makhalov@broadcom.com>,
Broadcom internal kernel review list
<bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@kernel.org>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
x86@kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, Dennis Zhou <dennis@kernel.org>,
Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Christoph Lameter <cl@gentwo.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org,
virtualization@lists.linux.dev, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
kernel-team@meta.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 5/7] locking: Add contended_release tracepoint to qspinlock
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2026 16:54:14 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2bc24e26-7b01-4e43-8f96-35334237397b@paulmck-laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <af285ffefa3fa2f73b73a39e9f06fb176009e047.1776350944.git.d@ilvokhin.com>
On Thu, Apr 16, 2026 at 03:05:11PM +0000, Dmitry Ilvokhin wrote:
> Use the arch-overridable queued_spin_release(), introduced in the
> previous commit, to ensure the tracepoint works correctly across all
> architectures, including those with custom unlock implementations (e.g.
> x86 paravirt).
>
> When the tracepoint is disabled, the only addition to the hot path is a
> single NOP instruction (the static branch). When enabled, the contention
> check, trace call, and unlock are combined in an out-of-line function to
> minimize hot path impact, avoiding the compiler needing to preserve the
> lock pointer in a callee-saved register across the trace call.
>
> Binary size impact (x86_64, defconfig):
> uninlined unlock (common case): +680 bytes (+0.00%)
> inlined unlock (worst case): +83659 bytes (+0.21%)
>
> The inlined unlock case could not be achieved through Kconfig options on
> x86_64 as PREEMPT_BUILD unconditionally selects UNINLINE_SPIN_UNLOCK on
> x86_64. The UNINLINE_SPIN_UNLOCK guards were manually inverted to force
> inline the unlock path and estimate the worst case binary size increase.
>
> In practice, configurations with UNINLINE_SPIN_UNLOCK=n have already
> opted against binary size optimization, so the inlined worst case is
> unlikely to be a concern.
>
> Architectures with fully custom qspinlock implementations (e.g.
> PowerPC) are not covered by this change.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Ilvokhin <d@ilvokhin.com>
Much nicer split out!
Acked-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
> ---
> include/asm-generic/qspinlock.h | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
> kernel/locking/qspinlock.c | 8 ++++++++
> 2 files changed, 26 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/include/asm-generic/qspinlock.h b/include/asm-generic/qspinlock.h
> index df76f34645a0..915a4c2777f6 100644
> --- a/include/asm-generic/qspinlock.h
> +++ b/include/asm-generic/qspinlock.h
> @@ -41,6 +41,7 @@
>
> #include <asm-generic/qspinlock_types.h>
> #include <linux/atomic.h>
> +#include <linux/tracepoint-defs.h>
>
> #ifndef queued_spin_is_locked
> /**
> @@ -129,12 +130,29 @@ static __always_inline void queued_spin_release(struct qspinlock *lock)
> }
> #endif
>
> +DECLARE_TRACEPOINT(contended_release);
> +
> +extern void queued_spin_release_traced(struct qspinlock *lock);
> +
> /**
> * queued_spin_unlock - unlock a queued spinlock
> * @lock : Pointer to queued spinlock structure
> + *
> + * Generic tracing wrapper around the arch-overridable
> + * queued_spin_release().
> */
> static __always_inline void queued_spin_unlock(struct qspinlock *lock)
> {
> + /*
> + * Trace and release are combined in queued_spin_release_traced() so
> + * the compiler does not need to preserve the lock pointer across the
> + * function call, avoiding callee-saved register save/restore on the
> + * hot path.
> + */
> + if (tracepoint_enabled(contended_release)) {
> + queued_spin_release_traced(lock);
> + return;
> + }
> queued_spin_release(lock);
> }
>
> diff --git a/kernel/locking/qspinlock.c b/kernel/locking/qspinlock.c
> index af8d122bb649..c72610980ec7 100644
> --- a/kernel/locking/qspinlock.c
> +++ b/kernel/locking/qspinlock.c
> @@ -104,6 +104,14 @@ static __always_inline u32 __pv_wait_head_or_lock(struct qspinlock *lock,
> #define queued_spin_lock_slowpath native_queued_spin_lock_slowpath
> #endif
>
> +void __lockfunc queued_spin_release_traced(struct qspinlock *lock)
> +{
> + if (queued_spin_is_contended(lock))
> + trace_contended_release(lock);
> + queued_spin_release(lock);
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(queued_spin_release_traced);
> +
> #endif /* _GEN_PV_LOCK_SLOWPATH */
>
> /**
> --
> 2.52.0
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-16 23:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-16 15:05 [PATCH v5 0/7] locking: contended_release tracepoint instrumentation Dmitry Ilvokhin
2026-04-16 15:05 ` [PATCH v5 1/7] tracing/lock: Remove unnecessary linux/sched.h include Dmitry Ilvokhin
2026-04-16 15:05 ` [PATCH v5 2/7] locking/percpu-rwsem: Extract __percpu_up_read() Dmitry Ilvokhin
2026-04-16 15:05 ` [PATCH v5 3/7] locking: Add contended_release tracepoint to sleepable locks Dmitry Ilvokhin
2026-04-16 15:05 ` [PATCH v5 4/7] locking: Factor out queued_spin_release() Dmitry Ilvokhin
2026-04-16 15:05 ` [PATCH v5 5/7] locking: Add contended_release tracepoint to qspinlock Dmitry Ilvokhin
2026-04-16 23:54 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2026-04-16 15:05 ` [PATCH v5 6/7] locking: Factor out __queued_read_unlock()/__queued_write_unlock() Dmitry Ilvokhin
2026-04-16 23:55 ` Paul E. McKenney
2026-04-16 15:05 ` [PATCH v5 7/7] locking: Add contended_release tracepoint to qrwlock Dmitry Ilvokhin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2bc24e26-7b01-4e43-8f96-35334237397b@paulmck-laptop \
--to=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=ajay.kaher@broadcom.com \
--cc=alexey.makhalov@broadcom.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com \
--cc=boqun@kernel.org \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=cl@gentwo.org \
--cc=d@ilvokhin.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dennis@kernel.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jgross@suse.com \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mips@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=longman@redhat.com \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@kernel.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=tsbogend@alpha.franken.de \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox