Re: [PATCH -v6 2/2] arm64, tlbflush: don't TLBI broadcast if page reused in write fault

["David Hildenbrand (Red Hat)" <david@kernel.org>]

On 14.11.25 09:54, Huang Ying wrote:
> A multi-thread customer workload with large memory footprint uses
> fork()/exec() to run some external programs every tens seconds.  When
> running the workload on an arm64 server machine, it's observed that
> quite some CPU cycles are spent in the TLB flushing functions.  While
> running the workload on the x86_64 server machine, it's not.  This
> causes the performance on arm64 to be much worse than that on x86_64.
> 
> During the workload running, after fork()/exec() write-protects all
> pages in the parent process, memory writing in the parent process
> will cause a write protection fault.  Then the page fault handler
> will make the PTE/PDE writable if the page can be reused, which is
> almost always true in the workload.  On arm64, to avoid the write
> protection fault on other CPUs, the page fault handler flushes the TLB
> globally with TLBI broadcast after changing the PTE/PDE.  However, this
> isn't always necessary.  Firstly, it's safe to leave some stale
> read-only TLB entries as long as they will be flushed finally.
> Secondly, it's quite possible that the original read-only PTE/PDEs
> aren't cached in remote TLB at all if the memory footprint is large.
> In fact, on x86_64, the page fault handler doesn't flush the remote
> TLB in this situation, which benefits the performance a lot.
> 
> To improve the performance on arm64, make the write protection fault
> handler flush the TLB locally instead of globally via TLBI broadcast
> after making the PTE/PDE writable.  If there are stale read-only TLB
> entries in the remote CPUs, the page fault handler on these CPUs will
> regard the page fault as spurious and flush the stale TLB entries.
> 
> To test the patchset, make the usemem.c from
> vm-scalability (https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/wfg/vm-scalability.git).
> support calling fork()/exec() periodically.  To mimic the behavior of
> the customer workload, run usemem with 4 threads, access 100GB memory,
> and call fork()/exec() every 40 seconds.  Test results show that with
> the patchset the score of usemem improves ~40.6%.  The cycles% of TLB
> flush functions reduces from ~50.5% to ~0.3% in perf profile.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Huang Ying <ying.huang@linux.alibaba.com>
> Reviewed-by: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>
> Reviewed-by: Barry Song <baohua@kernel.org>
> Acked-by: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
> Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
> Cc: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com>
> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
> Cc: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
> Cc: Yang Shi <yang@os.amperecomputing.com>
> Cc: "Christoph Lameter (Ampere)" <cl@gentwo.org>
> Cc: Dev Jain <dev.jain@arm.com>
> Cc: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
> Cc: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>
> Cc: Kevin Brodsky <kevin.brodsky@arm.com>
> Cc: Yin Fengwei <fengwei_yin@linux.alibaba.com>
> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org
> ---

(no need to resend just for acks/rbs, maintainers can pick that up)

Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand (Red Hat) <david@kernel.org>

-- 
Cheers

David