linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
To: Nadav Amit <namit@vmware.com>
Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
	Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>,
	"virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org"
	<virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
	"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/balloon_compaction: suppress allocation warnings
Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2019 21:13:36 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2aa52636-4ca7-0d47-c5bf-42408af3ea0f@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <FC42B62F-167F-4D7D-ADC5-926B36347E82@vmware.com>

On 21.08.19 18:34, Nadav Amit wrote:
>> On Aug 21, 2019, at 9:29 AM, David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>> On 21.08.19 18:23, Nadav Amit wrote:
>>>> On Aug 21, 2019, at 9:05 AM, David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 20.08.19 11:16, Nadav Amit wrote:
>>>>> There is no reason to print warnings when balloon page allocation fails,
>>>>> as they are expected and can be handled gracefully.  Since VMware
>>>>> balloon now uses balloon-compaction infrastructure, and suppressed these
>>>>> warnings before, it is also beneficial to suppress these warnings to
>>>>> keep the same behavior that the balloon had before.
>>>>
>>>> I am not sure if that's a good idea. The allocation warnings are usually
>>>> the only trace of "the user/admin did something bad because he/she tried
>>>> to inflate the balloon to an unsafe value". Believe me, I processed a
>>>> couple of such bugreports related to virtio-balloon and the warning were
>>>> very helpful for that.
>>>
>>> Ok, so a message is needed, but does it have to be a generic frightening
>>> warning?
>>>
>>> How about using __GFP_NOWARN, and if allocation do something like:
>>>
>>>  pr_warn(“Balloon memory allocation failed”);
>>>
>>> Or even something more informative? This would surely be less intimidating
>>> for common users.
>>
>> ratelimit would make sense :)
>>
>> And yes, this would certainly be nicer.
> 
> Thanks. I will post v2 of the patch.
> 

As discussed in v2, we already print a warning in virtio-balloon, so I
am fine with this patch.

Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>

-- 

Thanks,

David / dhildenb


  reply	other threads:[~2019-08-21 19:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-08-20  9:16 Nadav Amit
2019-08-21 16:05 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-08-21 16:23   ` Nadav Amit
2019-08-21 16:29     ` David Hildenbrand
2019-08-21 16:34       ` Nadav Amit
2019-08-21 19:13         ` David Hildenbrand [this message]
2019-08-21 19:44           ` Nadav Amit
2019-09-04 10:37             ` Michael S. Tsirkin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2aa52636-4ca7-0d47-c5bf-42408af3ea0f@redhat.com \
    --to=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=namit@vmware.com \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox