linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>
To: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Kevin Brodsky <kevin.brodsky@arm.com>,
	David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Gerald Schaefer <gerald.schaefer@linux.ibm.com>,
	Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>,
	Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
	Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>,
	linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 6/6] s390/mm: Allow lazy MMU mode disabling
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2026 09:00:57 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2a497bff-1773-4245-a63c-784ed8853b11-agordeev@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260416054405.10407B6c-hca@linux.ibm.com>

On Thu, Apr 16, 2026 at 07:44:05AM +0200, Heiko Carstens wrote:
> > @@ -169,6 +185,8 @@ void arch_enter_lazy_mmu_mode_for_pte_range(struct mm_struct *mm,
> >  {
> >  	if (!test_facility(13))
> >  		return;
> > +	if (!static_branch_likely(&lazy_mmu))
> > +		return;
> 
> Looks like there is an alternative chicken switch available: remove
> facility bit 13 from the facility list via kernel command line option.
> 
> Unless I am mistaken: that should be sufficient and avoids adding more
> code.

But that would also withdraw multi-IPTE from other unrelated parts of
the code, e.g. from __kernel_map_pages().


  reply	other threads:[~2026-04-16  7:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-04-15 15:01 [PATCH v2 0/6] s390/mm: Batch PTE updates in lazy MMU mode Alexander Gordeev
2026-04-15 15:01 ` [PATCH v2 1/6] mm: Make lazy MMU mode context-aware Alexander Gordeev
2026-04-15 15:01 ` [PATCH v2 2/6] mm/pgtable: Fix bogus comment to clear_not_present_full_ptes() Alexander Gordeev
2026-04-16  7:58   ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-04-16  8:53     ` Alexander Gordeev
2026-04-15 15:01 ` [PATCH v2 3/6] s390/mm: Complete ptep_get() conversion Alexander Gordeev
2026-04-15 15:01 ` [PATCH v2 4/6] s390/mm: Make PTC and UV call order consistent Alexander Gordeev
2026-04-15 15:01 ` [PATCH v2 5/6] s390/mm: Batch PTE updates in lazy MMU mode Alexander Gordeev
2026-04-16  5:40   ` Heiko Carstens
2026-04-16  5:51     ` Alexander Gordeev
2026-04-15 15:01 ` [PATCH v2 6/6] s390/mm: Allow lazy MMU mode disabling Alexander Gordeev
2026-04-16  5:44   ` Heiko Carstens
2026-04-16  7:00     ` Alexander Gordeev [this message]
2026-04-16  8:22       ` Christian Borntraeger

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2a497bff-1773-4245-a63c-784ed8853b11-agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=gerald.schaefer@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=kevin.brodsky@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox