From: Peng Zhang <zhangpeng.00@bytedance.com>
To: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
Cc: glider@google.com, dvyukov@google.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
kasan-dev@googlegroups.com, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, muchun.song@linux.dev,
Peng Zhang <zhangpeng.00@bytedance.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: kfence: allocate kfence_metadata at runtime
Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2023 16:28:32 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2a16a76c-506c-f325-6792-4fb58e8da531@bytedance.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CANpmjNOHz+dRbJsAyg29nksPMcd2P6109iPxTem_-b2qfUvXtw@mail.gmail.com>
在 2023/7/10 18:19, Marco Elver 写道:
> On Mon, 10 Jul 2023 at 05:27, 'Peng Zhang' via kasan-dev
> <kasan-dev@googlegroups.com> wrote:
>>
>> kfence_metadata is currently a static array. For the purpose of
>> allocating scalable __kfence_pool, we first change it to runtime
>> allocation of metadata. Since the size of an object of kfence_metadata
>> is 1160 bytes, we can save at least 72 pages (with default 256 objects)
>> without enabling kfence.
>>
>> Below is the numbers obtained in qemu (with default 256 objects).
>> before: Memory: 8134692K/8388080K available (3668K bss)
>> after: Memory: 8136740K/8388080K available (1620K bss)
>> More than expected, it saves 2MB memory.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Peng Zhang <zhangpeng.00@bytedance.com>
>
> Seems like a reasonable optimization, but see comments below.
>
> Also with this patch applied on top of v6.5-rc1, KFENCE just doesn't
> init at all anymore (early init). Please fix.
I'm very sorry because I made a slight modification before sending the
patch but it has not been tested, which caused it to not work properly.
I fixed some of the issues you mentioned in v2[1].
[1]
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20230712081616.45177-1-zhangpeng.00@bytedance.com/
>
>> ---
>> mm/kfence/core.c | 102 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
>> mm/kfence/kfence.h | 5 ++-
>> 2 files changed, 78 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/mm/kfence/core.c b/mm/kfence/core.c
>> index dad3c0eb70a0..b9fec1c46e3d 100644
>> --- a/mm/kfence/core.c
>> +++ b/mm/kfence/core.c
>> @@ -116,7 +116,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(__kfence_pool); /* Export for test modules. */
>> * backing pages (in __kfence_pool).
>> */
>> static_assert(CONFIG_KFENCE_NUM_OBJECTS > 0);
>> -struct kfence_metadata kfence_metadata[CONFIG_KFENCE_NUM_OBJECTS];
>> +struct kfence_metadata *kfence_metadata;
>>
>> /* Freelist with available objects. */
>> static struct list_head kfence_freelist = LIST_HEAD_INIT(kfence_freelist);
>> @@ -643,13 +643,56 @@ static unsigned long kfence_init_pool(void)
>> return addr;
>> }
>>
>> +static int kfence_alloc_metadata(void)
>> +{
>> + unsigned long nr_pages = KFENCE_METADATA_SIZE / PAGE_SIZE;
>> +
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_CONTIG_ALLOC
>> + struct page *pages;
>> +
>> + pages = alloc_contig_pages(nr_pages, GFP_KERNEL, first_online_node,
>> + NULL);
>> + if (pages)
>> + kfence_metadata = page_to_virt(pages);
>> +#else
>> + if (nr_pages > MAX_ORDER_NR_PAGES) {
>> + pr_warn("KFENCE_NUM_OBJECTS too large for buddy allocator\n");
>
> Does this mean that KFENCE won't work at all if we can't allocate the
> metadata? I.e. it won't work either in early nor late init modes?
>
> I know we already have this limitation for _late init_ of the KFENCE pool.
>
> So I have one major question: when doing _early init_, what is the
> maximum size of the KFENCE pool (#objects) with this change?
It will be limited to 2^10/sizeof(struct kfence_metadata) by buddy
system, so I used memblock to allocate kfence_metadata in v2.
>
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> + }
>> + kfence_metadata = alloc_pages_exact(KFENCE_METADATA_SIZE,
>> + GFP_KERNEL);
>> +#endif
>> +
>> + if (!kfence_metadata)
>> + return -ENOMEM;
>> +
>> + memset(kfence_metadata, 0, KFENCE_METADATA_SIZE);
>
> memzero_explicit, or pass __GFP_ZERO to alloc_pages?
Unfortunately, __GFP_ZERO does not work successfully in
alloc_contig_pages(), so I used memzero_explicit() in v2.
Even though I don't know if memzero_explicit() is necessary
(it just uses the barrier).
>
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void kfence_free_metadata(void)
>> +{
>> + if (WARN_ON(!kfence_metadata))
>> + return;
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_CONTIG_ALLOC
>> + free_contig_range(page_to_pfn(virt_to_page((void *)kfence_metadata)),
>> + KFENCE_METADATA_SIZE / PAGE_SIZE);
>> +#else
>> + free_pages_exact((void *)kfence_metadata, KFENCE_METADATA_SIZE);
>> +#endif
>> + kfence_metadata = NULL;
>> +}
>> +
>> static bool __init kfence_init_pool_early(void)
>> {
>> - unsigned long addr;
>> + unsigned long addr = (unsigned long)__kfence_pool;
>>
>> if (!__kfence_pool)
>> return false;
>>
>> + if (!kfence_alloc_metadata())
>> + goto free_pool;
>> +
>> addr = kfence_init_pool();
>>
>> if (!addr) {
>> @@ -663,6 +706,7 @@ static bool __init kfence_init_pool_early(void)
>> return true;
>> }
>>
>> + kfence_free_metadata();
>> /*
>> * Only release unprotected pages, and do not try to go back and change
>> * page attributes due to risk of failing to do so as well. If changing
>> @@ -670,31 +714,12 @@ static bool __init kfence_init_pool_early(void)
>> * fails for the first page, and therefore expect addr==__kfence_pool in
>> * most failure cases.
>> */
>> +free_pool:
>> memblock_free_late(__pa(addr), KFENCE_POOL_SIZE - (addr - (unsigned long)__kfence_pool));
>> __kfence_pool = NULL;
>> return false;
>> }
>>
>> -static bool kfence_init_pool_late(void)
>> -{
>> - unsigned long addr, free_size;
>> -
>> - addr = kfence_init_pool();
>> -
>> - if (!addr)
>> - return true;
>> -
>> - /* Same as above. */
>> - free_size = KFENCE_POOL_SIZE - (addr - (unsigned long)__kfence_pool);
>> -#ifdef CONFIG_CONTIG_ALLOC
>> - free_contig_range(page_to_pfn(virt_to_page((void *)addr)), free_size / PAGE_SIZE);
>> -#else
>> - free_pages_exact((void *)addr, free_size);
>> -#endif
>> - __kfence_pool = NULL;
>> - return false;
>> -}
>> -
>> /* === DebugFS Interface ==================================================== */
>>
>> static int stats_show(struct seq_file *seq, void *v)
>> @@ -896,6 +921,10 @@ void __init kfence_init(void)
>> static int kfence_init_late(void)
>> {
>> const unsigned long nr_pages = KFENCE_POOL_SIZE / PAGE_SIZE;
>> + unsigned long addr = (unsigned long)__kfence_pool;
>> + unsigned long free_size = KFENCE_POOL_SIZE;
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> #ifdef CONFIG_CONTIG_ALLOC
>> struct page *pages;
>>
>> @@ -913,15 +942,29 @@ static int kfence_init_late(void)
>> return -ENOMEM;
>> #endif
>>
>> - if (!kfence_init_pool_late()) {
>> - pr_err("%s failed\n", __func__);
>> - return -EBUSY;
>> + ret = kfence_alloc_metadata();
>> + if (!ret)
>> + goto free_pool;
>> +
>> + addr = kfence_init_pool();
>> + if (!addr) {
>> + kfence_init_enable();
>> + kfence_debugfs_init();
>> + return 0;
>> }
>>
>> - kfence_init_enable();
>> - kfence_debugfs_init();
>> + pr_err("%s failed\n", __func__);
>> + kfence_free_metadata();
>> + free_size = KFENCE_POOL_SIZE - (addr - (unsigned long)__kfence_pool);
>> + ret = -EBUSY;
>>
>> - return 0;
>> +free_pool:
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_CONTIG_ALLOC
>> + free_contig_range(page_to_pfn(virt_to_page((void *)addr)), free_size / PAGE_SIZE);
>> +#else
>> + free_pages_exact((void *)addr, free_size);
>> +#endif
>
> You moved this from kfence_init_pool_late - that did "__kfence_pool =
> NULL" which is missing now.
Thanks for spotting this, I added it in v2.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-07-12 8:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-07-10 3:27 Peng Zhang
2023-07-10 10:19 ` Marco Elver
2023-07-10 10:21 ` Marco Elver
2023-07-10 10:52 ` Peng Zhang
2023-07-12 8:28 ` Peng Zhang [this message]
2023-07-12 8:37 ` Peng Zhang
2023-07-10 10:37 ` Alexander Potapenko
2023-07-10 10:58 ` Peng Zhang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2a16a76c-506c-f325-6792-4fb58e8da531@bytedance.com \
--to=zhangpeng.00@bytedance.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dvyukov@google.com \
--cc=elver@google.com \
--cc=glider@google.com \
--cc=kasan-dev@googlegroups.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=muchun.song@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox