From: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
To: David Laight <david.laight.linux@gmail.com>
Cc: David Laight <David.Laight@aculab.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
'Arnd Bergmann' <arnd@kernel.org>,
"'linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org'" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
'Jens Axboe' <axboe@kernel.dk>,
'Matthew Wilcox' <willy@infradead.org>,
'Christoph Hellwig' <hch@infradead.org>,
'Andrew Morton' <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
'Andy Shevchenko' <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
'Dan Carpenter' <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>,
"'Jason A . Donenfeld'" <Jason@zx2c4.com>,
"'pedro.falcato@gmail.com'" <pedro.falcato@gmail.com>,
'Mateusz Guzik' <mjguzik@gmail.com>,
"'linux-mm@kvack.org'" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
'Lorenzo Stoakes' <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com>,
intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
David Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>, Simona Vetter <simona@ffwll.ch>,
Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>,
Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Subject: Re: Buiild error in i915/xe (was: [PATCH next 4/7] minmax.h: Use BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG() for the lo < hi test in clamp())
Date: Sat, 18 Jan 2025 09:49:21 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <29ef57a1-e4dd-4d5d-8726-f1f79c698b66@roeck-us.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250118170959.3aa56f4d@pumpkin>
On Sat, Jan 18, 2025 at 05:09:59PM +0000, David Laight wrote:
> On Sat, 18 Jan 2025 08:13:06 -0800
> Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Mon, Nov 18, 2024 at 07:13:31PM +0000, David Laight wrote:
> > > Use BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG(statically_true(ulo > uhi), ...) for the sanity
> > > check of the bounds in clamp().
> > > Gives better error coverage and one less expansion of the arguments.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: David Laight <david.laight@aculab.com>
> >
> > This patch triggers a build error when trying to build parisc:allmodconfig.
> > See error message and bisect log below.
> >
> > I don't think there is anything wrong with the patch. The underlying
> > problem seems to be that parisc:allmodconfig enables CONFIG_DRM_XE which
> > tries to build the affected file even though CONFIG_DRM_I915 is not
> > enabled/supported on parisc.
>
> This has appeared before.
> Any idea which inlined copy of scale() is causing the problem.
> On the face of it they all look ok.
>
> If you can reproduce it maybe try commenting out some of the calls.
>
See diff below. All three changes are needed.
No idea why the compiler would know that the values are invalid.
Guenter
---
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_backlight.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_backlight.c
index fc1e517e074a..3b2c8bdfcf8d 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_backlight.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_backlight.c
@@ -76,10 +76,14 @@ static u32 clamp_user_to_hw(struct intel_connector *connector,
static u32 scale_hw_to_user(struct intel_connector *connector,
u32 hw_level, u32 user_max)
{
+#if 0
struct intel_panel *panel = &connector->panel;
return scale(hw_level, panel->backlight.min, panel->backlight.max,
0, user_max);
+#else
+ return 0;
+#endif
}
u32 intel_backlight_invert_pwm_level(struct intel_connector *connector, u32 val)
@@ -119,8 +123,10 @@ u32 intel_backlight_level_to_pwm(struct intel_connector *connector, u32 val)
drm_WARN_ON_ONCE(&i915->drm,
panel->backlight.max == 0 || panel->backlight.pwm_level_max == 0);
+#if 0
val = scale(val, panel->backlight.min, panel->backlight.max,
panel->backlight.pwm_level_min, panel->backlight.pwm_level_max);
+#endif
return intel_backlight_invert_pwm_level(connector, val);
}
@@ -138,8 +144,12 @@ u32 intel_backlight_level_from_pwm(struct intel_connector *connector, u32 val)
intel_has_quirk(display, QUIRK_INVERT_BRIGHTNESS)))
val = panel->backlight.pwm_level_max - (val - panel->backlight.pwm_level_min);
+#if 0
return scale(val, panel->backlight.pwm_level_min, panel->backlight.pwm_level_max,
panel->backlight.min, panel->backlight.max);
+#else
+ return 0;
+#endif
}
static u32 lpt_get_backlight(struct intel_connector *connector, enum pipe unused)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-01-18 17:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-11-18 19:09 [PATCH next 0/7] minmax.h: Cleanups and minor optimisations David Laight
2024-11-18 19:11 ` [PATCH next 1/7] minmax.h: Add whitespace around operators and after commas David Laight
2024-11-18 19:12 ` [PATCH next 2/7] minmax.h: Update some comments David Laight
2024-11-18 19:12 ` [PATCH next 3/7] minmax.h: Reduce the #define expansion of min(), max() and clamp() David Laight
2024-11-18 19:13 ` [PATCH next 4/7] minmax.h: Use BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG() for the lo < hi test in clamp() David Laight
2025-01-18 16:13 ` Buiild error in i915/xe (was: [PATCH next 4/7] minmax.h: Use BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG() for the lo < hi test in clamp()) Guenter Roeck
2025-01-18 17:09 ` David Laight
2025-01-18 17:49 ` Guenter Roeck [this message]
2025-01-18 18:09 ` David Laight
2025-01-18 18:36 ` Buiild error in i915/xe Guenter Roeck
2025-01-18 21:18 ` David Laight
2025-01-18 21:38 ` Guenter Roeck
2025-01-18 21:21 ` Buiild error in i915/xe (was: [PATCH next 4/7] minmax.h: Use BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG() for the lo < hi test in clamp()) Linus Torvalds
2025-01-18 21:59 ` Buiild error in i915/xe Guenter Roeck
2025-01-18 22:04 ` Linus Torvalds
2025-01-18 22:11 ` Buiild error in i915/xe (was: [PATCH next 4/7] minmax.h: Use BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG() for the lo < hi test in clamp()) David Laight
2025-01-18 22:58 ` Buiild error in i915/xe Guenter Roeck
2025-01-19 9:09 ` David Laight
2025-01-20 10:48 ` Jani Nikula
2025-01-20 11:15 ` David Laight
2025-01-20 11:21 ` Jani Nikula
2025-01-20 14:15 ` Guenter Roeck
2025-01-20 18:41 ` David Laight
2025-01-20 18:55 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-01-20 19:14 ` Linus Torvalds
2025-01-21 5:58 ` Guenter Roeck
2025-01-18 23:24 ` Buiild error in i915/xe (was: [PATCH next 4/7] minmax.h: Use BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG() for the lo < hi test in clamp()) Pedro Falcato
2024-11-18 19:14 ` [PATCH next 5/7] minmax.h: Move all the clamp() definitions after the min/max() ones David Laight
2024-11-18 19:15 ` [PATCH next 6/7] minmax.h: Simplify the variants of clamp() David Laight
2024-11-22 20:20 ` kernel test robot
2024-11-28 15:05 ` kernel test robot
2024-11-28 15:52 ` David Laight
2024-11-18 19:15 ` [PATCH next 7/7] minmax.h: Remove some #defines that are only expanded once David Laight
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=29ef57a1-e4dd-4d5d-8726-f1f79c698b66@roeck-us.net \
--to=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=David.Laight@aculab.com \
--cc=Jason@zx2c4.com \
--cc=airlied@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=arnd@kernel.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=dan.carpenter@linaro.org \
--cc=david.laight.linux@gmail.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
--cc=mjguzik@gmail.com \
--cc=pedro.falcato@gmail.com \
--cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
--cc=simona@ffwll.ch \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox