From: Li Xinhai <lixinhai.lxh@gmail.com>
To: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3] mm/gup.c: stricter check on THP migration entry during follow_pmd_mask
Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2021 13:49:02 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2951c893-91e3-3aee-5446-f868336c5b11@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87wnk4rl2w.fsf@yhuang6-desk2.ccr.corp.intel.com>
On 12/17/21 11:01 AM, Huang, Ying wrote:
> Li Xinhai <lixinhai.lxh@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> When BUG_ON check for THP migration entry, the exsiting code only check
>
> s/exsiting/existing/
>
> Found some misspelling in the comments too. Please fix them with some
> tool.
>
Yes, those need be fixed, thanks.
> Best Regards,
> Huang, Ying
>
>> thp_migration_supported case, but not for !thp_migration_supported case.
>> If !thp_migration_supported() and !pmd_present(), the original code may
>> dead loop in theory. To make the BUG_ON check consistent, we need catch
>> both cases.
>>
>> Move the BUG_ON check one step eariler, because if the bug happen we
>> should know it instead of depend on FOLL_MIGRATION been used by caller.
>>
>> Because pmdval instead of *pmd is read by the is_pmd_migration_entry()
>> check, the existing code don't help to avoid useless locking within
>> pmd_migration_entry_wait(), so remove that check.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Li Xinhai <lixinhai.lxh@gmail.com>
>> Cc: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
>> Cc: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com>
>> Cc: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
>> ---
>> V2->V3:
>> mention about the dead loop in commit message.
>>
>> V1->V2:
>> Move the BUG_ON() check before if(!(flags & FOLL_MIGRATION)); and add comments
>> for it.
>>
>>
>> mm/gup.c | 13 +++++++++----
>> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/mm/gup.c b/mm/gup.c
>> index 2c51e9748a6a..94d0e586ca0b 100644
>> --- a/mm/gup.c
>> +++ b/mm/gup.c
>> @@ -642,12 +642,17 @@ static struct page *follow_pmd_mask(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>> }
>> retry:
>> if (!pmd_present(pmdval)) {
>> + /*
>> + * Should never reach here, if thp migration is not supported;
>> + * Otherwise, it must be a thp miration entry.
>> + */
>> + VM_BUG_ON(!thp_migration_supported() ||
>> + !is_pmd_migration_entry(pmdval));
>> +
>> if (likely(!(flags & FOLL_MIGRATION)))
>> return no_page_table(vma, flags);
>> - VM_BUG_ON(thp_migration_supported() &&
>> - !is_pmd_migration_entry(pmdval));
>> - if (is_pmd_migration_entry(pmdval))
>> - pmd_migration_entry_wait(mm, pmd);
>> +
>> + pmd_migration_entry_wait(mm, pmd);
>> pmdval = READ_ONCE(*pmd);
>> /*
>> * MADV_DONTNEED may convert the pmd to null because
prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-12-17 5:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-12-17 2:34 Li Xinhai
2021-12-17 3:01 ` Huang, Ying
2021-12-17 5:49 ` Li Xinhai [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2951c893-91e3-3aee-5446-f868336c5b11@gmail.com \
--to=lixinhai.lxh@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=ying.huang@intel.com \
--cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox