From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.0 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D38FC433DB for ; Thu, 11 Feb 2021 02:26:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B570C60233 for ; Thu, 11 Feb 2021 02:26:19 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org B570C60233 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=nvidia.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 29D786B0005; Wed, 10 Feb 2021 21:26:19 -0500 (EST) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 24E016B0006; Wed, 10 Feb 2021 21:26:19 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 1635C6B006C; Wed, 10 Feb 2021 21:26:19 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0083.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.83]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 017FA6B0005 for ; Wed, 10 Feb 2021 21:26:18 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtpin03.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay02.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C553A8786 for ; Thu, 11 Feb 2021 02:26:18 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 77804397636.03.hand21_4c079a127615 Received: from filter.hostedemail.com (10.5.16.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.16.251]) by smtpin03.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A513B28A4E9 for ; Thu, 11 Feb 2021 02:26:18 +0000 (UTC) X-HE-Tag: hand21_4c079a127615 X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 3361 Received: from hqnvemgate26.nvidia.com (hqnvemgate26.nvidia.com [216.228.121.65]) by imf34.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Thu, 11 Feb 2021 02:26:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from hqmail.nvidia.com (Not Verified[216.228.121.13]) by hqnvemgate26.nvidia.com (using TLS: TLSv1.2, AES256-SHA) id ; Wed, 10 Feb 2021 18:26:16 -0800 Received: from [10.2.50.67] (172.20.145.6) by HQMAIL107.nvidia.com (172.20.187.13) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Thu, 11 Feb 2021 02:26:16 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/9] Add support for SVM atomics in Nouveau To: Alistair Popple , Linux MM , Nouveau Dev , Ben Skeggs , Andrew Morton , Linux Doc Mailing List , Linux Kernel Mailing List , , dri-devel , Ralph Campbell , Jerome Glisse , Jason Gunthorpe References: <20210209010722.13839-1-apopple@nvidia.com> <3426910.QXTomnrpqD@nvdebian> <57fe0deb-8bf6-d3ee-3545-11109e946528@nvidia.com> From: John Hubbard Message-ID: <2906f445-babb-5f4e-2d99-dc004ae1face@nvidia.com> Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2021 18:26:15 -0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:85.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/85.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [172.20.145.6] X-ClientProxiedBy: HQMAIL111.nvidia.com (172.20.187.18) To HQMAIL107.nvidia.com (172.20.187.13) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nvidia.com; s=n1; t=1613010376; bh=fWiSyOBWsVzyVm55YFwZ6S/xqnjzAJ77D4BJX4IdmYQ=; h=Subject:To:References:From:Message-ID:Date:User-Agent: MIME-Version:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Language: Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Originating-IP:X-ClientProxiedBy; b=leaB4fiXqE16gCtniTXQN7wSpNK6vqgNBnsubO6Sqz20znNTYyS1DivzYTMRS4UV7 w5Vir0tdNZkJIZJNa7GWAZkmqVslmOQbbFoYCui9m3qncJPbiLoeAgW6aOlHumrkeb AvqNZnglqc7Brug+AtJ88e4mmqyLBYYytyn9i/agt07SeilKDzj3ypZZzMaPyEc/1f qfcVy3BbtVAyuYqrqLZA+t6jewjnFT5OuJgR0tr56q4bF5w7n5XURdxoT6MgKpdprH LtGPzO04XwunHPGKsOBJRZoELR3w5OcRZukw35gXqIHSILXS8DAoXlexMKrAUC4a98 gWaYeMFi1C9IA== X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On 2/10/21 4:59 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote: ... >> GPU atomic operations to sysmem are hard to categorize, because because application >> programmers could easily write programs that do a long series of atomic operations. >> Such a program would be a little weird, but it's hard to rule out. > > Yeah, but we can forcefully break this whenever we feel like by revoking > the page, moving it, and then reinstating the gpu pte again and let it > continue. Oh yes, that's true. > > If that's no possible then what we need here instead is an mlock() type of > thing I think. No need for that, then. thanks, -- John Hubbard NVIDIA