From: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>
To: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>, Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
"Dike, Jeffrey G" <jeffrey.g.dike@intel.com>,
Hugh Dickins <hugh.dickins@tiscali.co.uk>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>,
Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
"nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp" <nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp>,
"lizf@cn.fujitsu.com" <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>,
"menage@google.com" <menage@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -v2] mm: do batched scans for mem_cgroup
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 12:55:27 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <28c262360908202055u2744879cic989e007867d0599@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090820040533.GA27540@localhost>
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 1:05 PM, Wu Fengguang<fengguang.wu@intel.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 11:13:47AM +0800, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
>> On Thu, 20 Aug 2009 10:49:29 +0800
>> Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com> wrote:
>>
>> > For mem_cgroup, shrink_zone() may call shrink_list() with nr_to_scan=1,
>> > in which case shrink_list() _still_ calls isolate_pages() with the much
>> > larger SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX. It effectively scales up the inactive list
>> > scan rate by up to 32 times.
>> >
>> > For example, with 16k inactive pages and DEF_PRIORITY=12, (16k >> 12)=4.
>> > So when shrink_zone() expects to scan 4 pages in the active/inactive
>> > list, it will be scanned SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX=32 pages in effect.
>> >
>> > The accesses to nr_saved_scan are not lock protected and so not 100%
>> > accurate, however we can tolerate small errors and the resulted small
>> > imbalanced scan rates between zones.
>> >
>> > This batching won't blur up the cgroup limits, since it is driven by
>> > "pages reclaimed" rather than "pages scanned". When shrink_zone()
>> > decides to cancel (and save) one smallish scan, it may well be called
>> > again to accumulate up nr_saved_scan.
>> >
>> > It could possibly be a problem for some tiny mem_cgroup (which may be
>> > _full_ scanned too much times in order to accumulate up nr_saved_scan).
>> >
>> > CC: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
>> > CC: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>
>> > CC: Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>> > CC: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
>> > CC: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
>> > Signed-off-by: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>
It looks better than now :)
I hope you will rewrite description and add test result in changelog. :)
Thanks for your great effort.
--
Kind regards,
Minchan Kim
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-08-21 16:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-08-20 2:49 [PATCH] " Wu Fengguang
2009-08-20 2:52 ` [PATCH] mm: make nr_scan_try_batch() more safe on races Wu Fengguang
2009-08-20 3:17 ` [RFC][PATCH] mm: remove unnecessary loop inside shrink_inactive_list() Wu Fengguang
2009-08-21 11:09 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-08-21 11:22 ` Wu Fengguang
2009-08-27 0:20 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-08-20 3:13 ` [PATCH] mm: do batched scans for mem_cgroup KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-08-20 4:05 ` [PATCH -v2] " Wu Fengguang
2009-08-20 4:06 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-08-20 5:16 ` Balbir Singh
2009-08-21 1:39 ` Wu Fengguang
2009-08-21 1:46 ` Wu Fengguang
2009-08-20 11:01 ` Minchan Kim
2009-08-20 11:49 ` Wu Fengguang
2009-08-20 12:13 ` Minchan Kim
2009-08-20 12:32 ` Wu Fengguang
2009-08-21 3:55 ` Minchan Kim [this message]
2009-08-21 7:27 ` [PATCH -v2 changelog updated] " Wu Fengguang
2009-08-21 10:57 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=28c262360908202055u2744879cic989e007867d0599@mail.gmail.com \
--to=minchan.kim@gmail.com \
--cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=cl@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=hugh.dickins@tiscali.co.uk \
--cc=jeffrey.g.dike@intel.com \
--cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lizf@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=mel@csn.ul.ie \
--cc=menage@google.com \
--cc=nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox