From: "MinChan Kim" <minchan.kim@gmail.com>
To: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Subject: Re: [rfc][patch] SLQB slab allocator
Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 16:01:06 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <28c262360812162301i58c9fe9l4a1ee89ca0a6a56@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20081217064238.GA26179@wotan.suse.de>
On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 3:42 PM, Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de> wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 08:42:12AM +0900, MinChan Kim wrote:
>> Hi, Nick.
>> I am interested in SLQB.
>> So I tested slqb, slub, slab by kernel compile time.
>>
>> make all -j 8
>>
>> slqb and slub not DEBUG.
>> my test environment is as follows.
>>
>> cpu family : 6
>> model : 15
>> model name : Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Quad CPU Q6600 @ 2.40GHz
>> stepping : 11
>> cpu MHz : 1600.000
>> cache size : 4096 KB
>>
>> Below is average for ten time test.
>>
>> slab :
>> user : 2376.484, system : 192.616 elapsed : 12:22.0
>> slub :
>> user : 2378.439, system : 194.989 elapsed : 12:22.4
>> slqb :
>> user : 2380.556, system : 194.801 elapsed : 12:23.0
>>
>> so, slqb is rather slow although it is a big difference.
>> Interestingly, slqb consumes less time than slub in system.
>
> Thanks, interesting test. kbuild is not very slab allocator intensive,
Let me know what is popular benchmark program in slab allocator.
I will try with it. :)
> so I hadn't thought of trying it. Possibly the object cacheline layout
> of longer lived allocations changes the behaviour (increased user time
> could indicate that).
What mean "object cacheline layout of loger lived allocations" ?
> I've been making a few changes to that, and hopefully slqb is slightly
> improved now (the margin is much closer, seems within the noise with
> SLUB on my NUMA opteron now, although that's a very different system).
>
> The biggest bug I fixed was that the NUMA path wasn't being taken in
> kmem_cache_free on NUMA systems (oops), but that wouldn't change your
> result. But I did make some other changes too, eg in prefetching.
OK. I will review and test your new patch in my machine.
--
Kinds regards,
MinChan Kim
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-12-17 6:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-12-12 0:25 Nick Piggin
2008-12-12 0:31 ` [rfc][patch] mm: kfree_size Nick Piggin
2008-12-13 2:36 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-12-12 5:38 ` [rfc][patch] SLQB slab allocator Eric Dumazet
2008-12-12 5:50 ` Nick Piggin
2008-12-12 7:07 ` Eric Dumazet
2008-12-12 7:23 ` Nick Piggin
2008-12-12 8:05 ` Eric Dumazet
2008-12-12 9:43 ` Nick Piggin
2008-12-13 2:34 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-12-13 9:03 ` Pekka Enberg
2008-12-15 1:51 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-12-14 23:04 ` Nick Piggin
2008-12-15 14:02 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-12-15 14:16 ` Nick Piggin
2008-12-15 15:03 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-12-15 23:42 ` MinChan Kim
2008-12-17 6:42 ` Nick Piggin
2008-12-17 7:01 ` MinChan Kim [this message]
2008-12-17 7:09 ` Nick Piggin
2008-12-19 7:48 ` Zhang, Yanmin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=28c262360812162301i58c9fe9l4a1ee89ca0a6a56@mail.gmail.com \
--to=minchan.kim@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=npiggin@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox