linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "MinChan Kim" <minchan.kim@gmail.com>
To: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@hp.com>,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	Takenori Nagano <t-nagano@ah.jp.nec.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] prevent incorrect oom under split_lru
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 14:59:26 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <28c262360806242259k3ac308c4n7cee29b72456e95b@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080624092824.4f0440ca@bree.surriel.com>

On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 10:28 PM, Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Jun 2008 17:31:54 +0900
> KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote:
>
>> if zone->recent_scanned parameter become inbalanceing anon and file,
>> OOM killer can happened although swappable page exist.
>>
>> So, if priority==0, We should try to reclaim all page for prevent OOM.
>
> You are absolutely right.  Good catch.

I have a concern about application latency.
If lru list have many pages, it take a very long time to scan pages.
More system have many ram, More many time to scan pages.

Of course I know this is trade-off between memory efficiency VS latency.
But In embedded, some application think latency is more important
thing than memory efficiency.
We need some mechanism to cut off scanning time.


I think Takenori Nagano's "memory reclaim more efficiently patch" is
proper to reduce application latency in this case If we modify some
code.

What do you think about it ?

>> Signed-off-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
>
> Acked-by: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
>
>> ---
>>  mm/vmscan.c |    6 ++++--
>>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> Index: b/mm/vmscan.c
>> ===================================================================
>> --- a/mm/vmscan.c
>> +++ b/mm/vmscan.c
>> @@ -1464,8 +1464,10 @@ static unsigned long shrink_zone(int pri
>>                        * kernel will slowly sift through each list.
>>                        */
>>                       scan = zone_page_state(zone, NR_LRU_BASE + l);
>> -                     scan >>= priority;
>> -                     scan = (scan * percent[file]) / 100;
>> +                     if (priority) {
>> +                             scan >>= priority;
>> +                             scan = (scan * percent[file]) / 100;
>> +                     }
>>                       zone->lru[l].nr_scan += scan + 1;
>>                       nr[l] = zone->lru[l].nr_scan;
>>                       if (nr[l] >= sc->swap_cluster_max)
>>
>
>
> --
> All rights reversed.
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
> the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
> see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
> Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
>



-- 
Kinds regards,
MinChan Kim

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2008-06-25  5:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-06-24  8:31 KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-06-24 13:28 ` Rik van Riel
2008-06-25  5:59   ` MinChan Kim [this message]
2008-06-25  6:08     ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-06-25  6:56       ` MinChan Kim
2008-06-25  6:58         ` MinChan Kim
2008-06-25  7:29           ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-06-25  7:37             ` MinChan Kim
2008-06-25 12:11         ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-06-25 13:05           ` MinChan Kim
2008-06-26  1:49             ` Takenori Nagano
2008-06-26  4:37               ` MinChan Kim
2008-06-26  5:24                 ` Takenori Nagano
2008-06-26  6:37                   ` MinChan Kim
2008-06-26  8:05                     ` Takenori Nagano
2008-06-26  0:36           ` KOSAKI Motohiro

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=28c262360806242259k3ac308c4n7cee29b72456e95b@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=minchan.kim@gmail.com \
    --cc=Lee.Schermerhorn@hp.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=riel@redhat.com \
    --cc=t-nagano@ah.jp.nec.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox