From: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
"sbsiddha@gmail.com" <sbsiddha@gmail.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>, Kernel Team <Kernel-team@fb.com>,
"stable@vger.kernel.org" <stable@vger.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/mm: Do not split_large_page() for set_kernel_text_rw()
Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2019 20:50:02 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <28DA9193-BD70-4B81-B1A9-98BC3E8BDDFA@fb.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0A94F7AA-7ECE-4363-B960-41F644CFE942@fb.com>
> On Aug 26, 2019, at 8:08 AM, Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>> On Aug 26, 2019, at 2:23 AM, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote:
>>
>> So only the high mapping is ever executable; the identity map should not
>> be. Both should be RO.
>>
>>> kprobe (with CONFIG_KPROBES_ON_FTRACE) should work on kernel identity
>>> mapping.
>>
>> Please provide more information; kprobes shouldn't be touching either
>> mapping. That is, afaict kprobes uses text_poke() which uses a temporary
>> mapping (in 'userspace' even) to alias the high text mapping.
>
> kprobe without CONFIG_KPROBES_ON_FTRACE uses text_poke(). But kprobe with
> CONFIG_KPROBES_ON_FTRACE uses another path. The split happens with
> set_kernel_text_rw() -> ... -> __change_page_attr() -> split_large_page().
> The split is introduced by commit 585948f4f695. do_split in
> __change_page_attr() becomes true after commit 585948f4f695. This patch
> tries to fix/workaround this part.
>
>>
>> I'm also not sure how it would then result in any 4k text maps. Yes the
>> alias is 4k, but it should not affect the actual high text map in any
>> way.
>
> I am confused by the alias logic. set_kernel_text_rw() makes the high map
> rw, and split the PMD in the high map.
>
>>
>> kprobes also allocates executable slots, but it does that in the module
>> range (afaict), so that, again, should not affect the high text mapping.
>>
>>> We found with 5.2 kernel (no CONFIG_PAGE_TABLE_ISOLATION, w/
>>> CONFIG_KPROBES_ON_FTRACE), a single kprobe will split _all_ PMDs in
>>> kernel text mapping into pte-mapped pages. This increases iTLB
>>> miss rate from about 300 per million instructions to about 700 per
>>> million instructions (for the application I test with).
>>>
>>> Per bisect, we found this behavior happens after commit 585948f4f695
>>> ("x86/mm/cpa: Avoid the 4k pages check completely"). That's why I
>>> proposed this PATCH to fix/workaround this issue. However, per
>>> Peter's comment and my study of the code, this doesn't seem the
>>> real problem or the only here.
>>>
>>> I also tested that the PMD split issue doesn't happen w/o
>>> CONFIG_KPROBES_ON_FTRACE.
>>
>> Right, because then ftrace doesn't flip the whole kernel map writable;
>> which it _really_ should stop doing anyway.
>>
>> But I'm still wondering what causes that first 4k split...
>
> Please see above.
Another data point: we can repro the issue on Linus's master with just
ftrace:
# start with PMD mapped
root@virt-test:~# grep ffff81000000- /sys/kernel/debug/page_tables/kernel
0xffffffff81000000-0xffffffff81c00000 12M ro PSE x pmd
# enable single ftrace
root@virt-test:~# echo consume_skb > /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/set_ftrace_filter
root@virt-test:~# echo function > /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/current_tracer
# now the text is PTE mapped
root@virt-test:~# grep ffff81000000- /sys/kernel/debug/page_tables/kernel
0xffffffff81000000-0xffffffff81c00000 12M ro x pte
Song
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-08-26 20:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-08-23 5:23 Song Liu
2019-08-23 9:36 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-08-26 4:40 ` Song Liu
2019-08-26 9:23 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-08-26 15:08 ` Song Liu
2019-08-26 20:50 ` Song Liu [this message]
2019-08-26 11:33 ` Steven Rostedt
2019-08-26 12:44 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-08-26 15:41 ` Nadav Amit
2019-08-26 15:56 ` Steven Rostedt
2019-08-26 16:09 ` Nadav Amit
2019-08-26 15:56 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=28DA9193-BD70-4B81-B1A9-98BC3E8BDDFA@fb.com \
--to=songliubraving@fb.com \
--cc=Kernel-team@fb.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=luto@amacapital.net \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=sbsiddha@gmail.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox