From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pl1-f198.google.com (mail-pl1-f198.google.com [209.85.214.198]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEBE38E0001 for ; Fri, 7 Sep 2018 21:46:07 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-pl1-f198.google.com with SMTP id d40-v6so7778298pla.14 for ; Fri, 07 Sep 2018 18:46:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mga18.intel.com (mga18.intel.com. [134.134.136.126]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id y4-v6si10014269pgo.390.2018.09.07.18.46.06 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 07 Sep 2018 18:46:06 -0700 (PDT) From: "Wang, Wei W" Subject: RE: [PATCH v36 0/5] Virtio-balloon: support free page reporting Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2018 01:46:02 +0000 Message-ID: <286AC319A985734F985F78AFA26841F7397924FE@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com> References: <1532075585-39067-1-git-send-email-wei.w.wang@intel.com> <20180723122342-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> <20180723143604.GB2457@work-vm> <5B911B03.2060602@intel.com> <20180907122955.GD2544@work-vm> In-Reply-To: <20180907122955.GD2544@work-vm> Content-Language: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" , "virtio-dev@lists.oasis-open.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org" , "kvm@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-mm@kvack.org" , "mhocko@kernel.org" , "akpm@linux-foundation.org" , "torvalds@linux-foundation.org" , "pbonzini@redhat.com" , "liliang.opensource@gmail.com" , "yang.zhang.wz@gmail.com" , "quan.xu0@gmail.com" , "nilal@redhat.com" , "riel@redhat.com" , "peterx@redhat.com" On Friday, September 7, 2018 8:30 PM, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote: > OK, that's much better. > The ~50% reducton with a 8G VM and a real workload is great, and it does > what you expect when you put a lot more RAM in and see the 84% reduction > on a guest with 128G RAM - 54s vs ~9s is a big win! >=20 > (The migrate_set_speed is a bit high, since that's in bytes/s - but it's = not > important). >=20 > That looks good, >=20 Thanks Dave for the feedback. Hope you can join our discussion and review the v37 patches as well. Best, Wei