From: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
To: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>, Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
James Houghton <jthoughton@google.com>,
Lorenzo Stoakes <lstoakes@gmail.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>,
Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com>, Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>, Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>,
Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com>,
"Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>,
Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 06/12] mm/gup: Drop folio_fast_pin_allowed() in hugepd processing
Date: Sun, 3 Dec 2023 13:33:25 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <283da12c-14f1-4255-b3c4-ab933f3373c4@csgroup.eu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZWj_EgljG3NwS5r1@x1n>
Le 30/11/2023 à 22:30, Peter Xu a écrit :
> On Fri, Nov 24, 2023 at 11:07:51AM -0500, Peter Xu wrote:
>> On Fri, Nov 24, 2023 at 09:06:01AM +0000, Ryan Roberts wrote:
>>> I don't have any micro-benchmarks for GUP though, if that's your question. Is
>>> there an easy-to-use test I can run to get some numbers? I'd be happy to try it out.
>>
>> Thanks Ryan. Then nothing is needed to be tested if gup is not yet touched
>> from your side, afaict. I'll see whether I can provide some rough numbers
>> instead in the next post (I'll probably only be able to test it in a VM,
>> though, but hopefully that should still reflect mostly the truth).
>
> An update: I finished a round of 64K cont_pte test, in the slow gup micro
> benchmark I see ~15% perf degrade with this patchset applied on a VM on top
> of Apple M1.
>
> Frankly that's even less than I expected, considering not only how slow gup
> THP used to be, but also on the fact that that's a tight loop over slow
> gup, which in normal cases shouldn't happen: "present" ptes normally goes
> to fast-gup, while !present goes into a fault following it. I assume
> that's why nobody cared slow gup for THP before. I think adding cont_pte
> support shouldn't be very hard, but that will include making cont_pte idea
> global just for arm64 and riscv Svnapot.
Is there any documentation on what cont_pte is ? I have always wondered
if it could also fit powerpc 8xx need ?
On powerpc, for 16k pages, we have to define 4 consecutive PTEs. All 4
PTE are flagged with the SPS bit telling it's a 16k pages, but for TLB
misses the HW needs one entrie for each 4k fragment.
There is also a similar approach for 512k pages, we have 128 contiguous
identical PTEs for them.
And whatever PAGE_SIZE is (either 4k or 16k), the HW needs one 'unsigned
long' pte for each 4k fragment. So at the time being when we define
PAGE_SIZE as 16k, we need a special pte_t which is a table of 4x
unsigned long.
Wondering if the cont_pte concept is similar and whether it could help.
Thanks
Christophe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-12-03 13:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-11-16 1:28 [PATCH RFC 00/12] mm/gup: Unify hugetlb, part 2 Peter Xu
2023-11-16 1:28 ` [PATCH RFC 01/12] mm/hugetlb: Export hugetlbfs_pagecache_present() Peter Xu
2023-11-23 7:23 ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-11-23 16:05 ` Peter Xu
2023-11-16 1:28 ` [PATCH RFC 02/12] mm: Provide generic pmd_thp_or_huge() Peter Xu
2023-11-16 1:28 ` [PATCH RFC 03/12] mm: Export HPAGE_PXD_* macros even if !THP Peter Xu
2023-11-23 7:23 ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-11-23 9:53 ` Mike Rapoport
2023-11-23 15:27 ` Peter Xu
2023-11-16 1:29 ` [PATCH RFC 04/12] mm: Introduce vma_pgtable_walk_{begin|end}() Peter Xu
2023-11-23 7:24 ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-11-23 16:11 ` Peter Xu
2023-11-24 4:02 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2023-11-24 15:34 ` Peter Xu
2023-11-16 1:29 ` [PATCH RFC 05/12] mm/gup: Fix follow_devmap_p[mu]d() to return even if NULL Peter Xu
2023-11-23 7:25 ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-11-23 17:59 ` Peter Xu
2023-11-16 1:29 ` [PATCH RFC 06/12] mm/gup: Drop folio_fast_pin_allowed() in hugepd processing Peter Xu
2023-11-20 8:26 ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-11-21 15:59 ` Peter Xu
2023-11-22 8:00 ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-11-22 15:22 ` Peter Xu
2023-11-23 7:21 ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-11-23 16:10 ` Peter Xu
2023-11-23 18:22 ` Christophe Leroy
2023-11-23 19:37 ` Peter Xu
2023-11-24 5:28 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2023-11-24 7:03 ` Christophe Leroy
2023-11-24 1:06 ` Michael Ellerman
2023-11-23 15:47 ` Matthew Wilcox
2023-11-23 17:22 ` Peter Xu
2023-11-23 19:11 ` Ryan Roberts
2023-11-23 19:46 ` Peter Xu
2023-11-24 9:06 ` Ryan Roberts
2023-11-24 16:07 ` Peter Xu
2023-11-30 21:30 ` Peter Xu
2023-12-03 13:33 ` Christophe Leroy [this message]
2023-12-04 11:11 ` Ryan Roberts
2023-12-04 11:25 ` Christophe Leroy
2023-12-04 11:46 ` Ryan Roberts
2023-12-04 11:57 ` Christophe Leroy
2023-12-04 12:02 ` Ryan Roberts
2023-12-04 16:48 ` Peter Xu
2023-11-16 1:29 ` [PATCH RFC 07/12] mm/gup: Refactor record_subpages() to find 1st small page Peter Xu
2023-11-16 14:51 ` Matthew Wilcox
2023-11-16 19:40 ` Peter Xu
2023-11-16 19:41 ` Matthew Wilcox
2023-11-16 1:29 ` [PATCH RFC 08/12] mm/gup: Handle hugetlb for no_page_table() Peter Xu
2023-11-23 7:26 ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-11-16 1:29 ` [PATCH RFC 09/12] mm/gup: Handle huge pud for follow_pud_mask() Peter Xu
2023-11-23 7:28 ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-11-23 16:19 ` Peter Xu
2023-11-16 1:29 ` [PATCH RFC 10/12] mm/gup: Handle huge pmd for follow_pmd_mask() Peter Xu
2023-11-16 1:29 ` [PATCH RFC 11/12] mm/gup: Handle hugepd for follow_page() Peter Xu
2023-11-16 1:29 ` [PATCH RFC 12/12] mm/gup: Merge hugetlb into generic mm code Peter Xu
2023-11-23 7:29 ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-11-23 16:21 ` Peter Xu
2023-11-22 14:51 ` [PATCH RFC 00/12] mm/gup: Unify hugetlb, part 2 Jason Gunthorpe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=283da12c-14f1-4255-b3c4-ab933f3373c4@csgroup.eu \
--to=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \
--cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=axelrasmussen@google.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=jhubbard@nvidia.com \
--cc=jthoughton@google.com \
--cc=kirill@shutemov.name \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=lstoakes@gmail.com \
--cc=mike.kravetz@oracle.com \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=riel@surriel.com \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
--cc=shy828301@gmail.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox