Re: [PATCH v3 02/11] mm: Hardened usercopy

[Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>]

Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> writes:

> diff --git a/mm/usercopy.c b/mm/usercopy.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..e4bf4e7ccdf6
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/mm/usercopy.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,234 @@
...
> +
> +/*
> + * Checks if a given pointer and length is contained by the current
> + * stack frame (if possible).
> + *
> + *	0: not at all on the stack
> + *	1: fully within a valid stack frame
> + *	2: fully on the stack (when can't do frame-checking)
> + *	-1: error condition (invalid stack position or bad stack frame)
> + */
> +static noinline int check_stack_object(const void *obj, unsigned long len)
> +{
> +	const void * const stack = task_stack_page(current);
> +	const void * const stackend = stack + THREAD_SIZE;

That allows access to the entire stack, including the struct thread_info,
is that what we want - it seems dangerous? Or did I miss a check
somewhere else?

We have end_of_stack() which computes the end of the stack taking
thread_info into account (end being the opposite of your end above).

cheers
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev