linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
To: Imran Khan <imran.f.khan@oracle.com>,
	cl@linux.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
	Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>,
	Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>,
	Oliver Glitta <glittao@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/2] mm, slub: Use stackdepot to store user information for slub object.
Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2021 14:06:59 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2772cf56-4183-857f-d070-c54bceb5c8d9@suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210831062539.898293-3-imran.f.khan@oracle.com>

On 8/31/21 08:25, Imran Khan wrote:
> SLAB_STORE_USER causes information about allocating and freeing context
> of a slub object, to be stored in metadata area in a couple of struct
> track objects. These objects store allocation and/or freeing stack trace
> in an array. This may result in same stack trace getting stored in metadata
> area of multiple objects.
> STACKDEPOT can be used to store unique stack traces without any
> duplication,so use STACKDEPOT to store allocation and/or freeing stack
> traces as well.
> This results in low memory footprint, as we are not storing multiple
> copies of the same stack trace for an allocation or free.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Imran Khan <imran.f.khan@oracle.com>
> ---
>  mm/slub.c | 87 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------------
>  1 file changed, 48 insertions(+), 39 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c
> index df1ac8aff86f..8e2a2b837106 100644
> --- a/mm/slub.c
> +++ b/mm/slub.c
> @@ -264,8 +264,8 @@ static inline bool kmem_cache_has_cpu_partial(struct kmem_cache *s)
>  #define TRACK_ADDRS_COUNT 16
>  struct track {
>  	unsigned long addr;	/* Called from address */
> -#ifdef CONFIG_STACKTRACE
> -	unsigned long addrs[TRACK_ADDRS_COUNT];	/* Called from address */
> +#ifdef CONFIG_STACKDEPOT
> +	depot_stack_handle_t stack;
>  #endif
>  	int cpu;		/* Was running on cpu */
>  	int pid;		/* Pid context */
> @@ -668,6 +668,27 @@ static inline unsigned int get_info_end(struct kmem_cache *s)
>  		return s->inuse;
>  }
>  
> +#ifdef CONFIG_STACKDEPOT
> +static depot_stack_handle_t slub_debug_save_stack(gfp_t flags)
> +{
> +	unsigned long entries[TRACK_ADDRS_COUNT];
> +	unsigned int nr_entries;
> +
> +	nr_entries = stack_trace_save(entries, ARRAY_SIZE(entries), 4);
> +	nr_entries = filter_irq_stacks(entries, nr_entries);
> +	return stack_depot_save(entries, nr_entries, flags);
> +}
> +
> +static void print_stack(depot_stack_handle_t stack)
> +{
> +	unsigned long *entries;
> +	unsigned int nr_entries;
> +
> +	nr_entries = stack_depot_fetch(stack, &entries);
> +	stack_trace_print(entries, nr_entries, 0);
> +}

This function could become part of stackdepot itself?

> +#endif
> +
>  static struct track *get_track(struct kmem_cache *s, void *object,
>  	enum track_item alloc)
>  {
> @@ -679,21 +700,13 @@ static struct track *get_track(struct kmem_cache *s, void *object,
>  }
>  
>  static void set_track(struct kmem_cache *s, void *object,
> -			enum track_item alloc, unsigned long addr)
> +			enum track_item alloc, unsigned long addr, gfp_t flags)
>  {
>  	struct track *p = get_track(s, object, alloc);
>  
>  	if (addr) {
> -#ifdef CONFIG_STACKTRACE
> -		unsigned int nr_entries;
> -
> -		metadata_access_enable();
> -		nr_entries = stack_trace_save(kasan_reset_tag(p->addrs),
> -					      TRACK_ADDRS_COUNT, 3);
> -		metadata_access_disable();
> -
> -		if (nr_entries < TRACK_ADDRS_COUNT)
> -			p->addrs[nr_entries] = 0;
> +#ifdef CONFIG_STACKDEPOT
> +		p->stack = slub_debug_save_stack(flags);
>  #endif
>  		p->addr = addr;
>  		p->cpu = smp_processor_id();
> @@ -709,10 +722,11 @@ static void init_tracking(struct kmem_cache *s, void *object)
>  	if (!(s->flags & SLAB_STORE_USER))
>  		return;
>  
> -	set_track(s, object, TRACK_FREE, 0UL);
> -	set_track(s, object, TRACK_ALLOC, 0UL);
> +	set_track(s, object, TRACK_FREE, 0UL, 0U);
> +	set_track(s, object, TRACK_ALLOC, 0UL, 0U);
>  }
>  
> +
>  static void print_track(const char *s, struct track *t, unsigned long pr_time)
>  {
>  	if (!t->addr)
> @@ -720,15 +734,11 @@ static void print_track(const char *s, struct track *t, unsigned long pr_time)
>  
>  	pr_err("%s in %pS age=%lu cpu=%u pid=%d\n",
>  	       s, (void *)t->addr, pr_time - t->when, t->cpu, t->pid);
> -#ifdef CONFIG_STACKTRACE
> -	{
> -		int i;
> -		for (i = 0; i < TRACK_ADDRS_COUNT; i++)
> -			if (t->addrs[i])
> -				pr_err("\t%pS\n", (void *)t->addrs[i]);
> -			else
> -				break;
> -	}
> +#ifdef CONFIG_STACKDEPOT
> +	if (t->stack)
> +		print_stack(t->stack);
> +	else
> +		pr_err("(stack is not available)\n");
>  #endif
>  }
>  
> @@ -1261,7 +1271,8 @@ static inline int alloc_consistency_checks(struct kmem_cache *s,
>  
>  static noinline int alloc_debug_processing(struct kmem_cache *s,
>  					struct page *page,
> -					void *object, unsigned long addr)
> +					void *object, unsigned long addr,
> +					gfp_t flags)
>  {
>  	if (s->flags & SLAB_CONSISTENCY_CHECKS) {
>  		if (!alloc_consistency_checks(s, page, object))
> @@ -1270,7 +1281,7 @@ static noinline int alloc_debug_processing(struct kmem_cache *s,
>  
>  	/* Success perform special debug activities for allocs */
>  	if (s->flags & SLAB_STORE_USER)
> -		set_track(s, object, TRACK_ALLOC, addr);
> +		set_track(s, object, TRACK_ALLOC, addr, flags);
>  	trace(s, page, object, 1);
>  	init_object(s, object, SLUB_RED_ACTIVE);
>  	return 1;
> @@ -1350,7 +1361,7 @@ static noinline int free_debug_processing(
>  	}
>  
>  	if (s->flags & SLAB_STORE_USER)
> -		set_track(s, object, TRACK_FREE, addr);
> +		set_track(s, object, TRACK_FREE, addr, GFP_NOWAIT);
>  	trace(s, page, object, 0);
>  	/* Freepointer not overwritten by init_object(), SLAB_POISON moved it */
>  	init_object(s, object, SLUB_RED_INACTIVE);
> @@ -2987,7 +2998,7 @@ static void *___slab_alloc(struct kmem_cache *s, gfp_t gfpflags, int node,
>  check_new_page:
>  
>  	if (kmem_cache_debug(s)) {
> -		if (!alloc_debug_processing(s, page, freelist, addr)) {
> +		if (!alloc_debug_processing(s, page, freelist, addr, gfpflags)) {
>  			/* Slab failed checks. Next slab needed */
>  			goto new_slab;
>  		} else {
> @@ -4275,6 +4286,8 @@ void kmem_obj_info(struct kmem_obj_info *kpp, void *object, struct page *page)
>  	void *objp0;
>  	struct kmem_cache *s = page->slab_cache;
>  	struct track __maybe_unused *trackp;
> +	unsigned long __maybe_unused *entries;
> +	unsigned int __maybe_unused nr_entries;
>  
>  	kpp->kp_ptr = object;
>  	kpp->kp_page = page;
> @@ -4297,19 +4310,15 @@ void kmem_obj_info(struct kmem_obj_info *kpp, void *object, struct page *page)
>  	objp = fixup_red_left(s, objp);
>  	trackp = get_track(s, objp, TRACK_ALLOC);
>  	kpp->kp_ret = (void *)trackp->addr;
> -#ifdef CONFIG_STACKTRACE
> -	for (i = 0; i < KS_ADDRS_COUNT && i < TRACK_ADDRS_COUNT; i++) {
> -		kpp->kp_stack[i] = (void *)trackp->addrs[i];
> -		if (!kpp->kp_stack[i])
> -			break;
> -	}
> +#ifdef CONFIG_STACKDEPOT
> +	nr_entries = stack_depot_fetch(trackp->stack, &entries);
> +	for (i = 0; i < nr_entries; i++)
> +		kpp->kp_stack[i] = (void *)entries[i];

Hmm, in case stack_depot_save() fails and returns a zero handle (e.g. due to
enomem) this seems to rely on stack_depot_fetch() returning gracefully with
zero nr_entries for a zero handle. But I don't see such guarantee?
stack_depot_init() isn't creating such entry and stack_depot_save() doesn't
have such check. So it will work accidentally, or return garbage? But it
would be IMHO useful to add such guarantee to stackdepot one way or another.

>  	trackp = get_track(s, objp, TRACK_FREE);
> -	for (i = 0; i < KS_ADDRS_COUNT && i < TRACK_ADDRS_COUNT; i++) {
> -		kpp->kp_free_stack[i] = (void *)trackp->addrs[i];
> -		if (!kpp->kp_free_stack[i])
> -			break;
> -	}
> +	nr_entries = stack_depot_fetch(trackp->stack, &entries);
> +	for (i = 0; i < nr_entries; i++)
> +		kpp->kp_free_stack[i] = (void *)entries[i];
>  #endif
>  #endif
>  }
> 



  reply	other threads:[~2021-08-31 12:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-08-31  6:25 [RFC PATCH 0/2] " Imran Khan
2021-08-31  6:25 ` [RFC PATCH 1/2] lib, stackdepot: Add input prompt for STACKDEPOT option Imran Khan
2021-08-31 11:25   ` Vlastimil Babka
2021-09-01  6:28     ` imran.f.khan
2021-08-31 15:54   ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2021-08-31  6:25 ` [RFC PATCH 2/2] mm, slub: Use stackdepot to store user information for slub object Imran Khan
2021-08-31 12:06   ` Vlastimil Babka [this message]
2021-09-01  6:36     ` imran.f.khan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2772cf56-4183-857f-d070-c54bceb5c8d9@suse.cz \
    --to=vbabka@suse.cz \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=cl@linux.com \
    --cc=glittao@gmail.com \
    --cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
    --cc=imran.f.khan@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=penberg@kernel.org \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox