linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
To: Donet Tom <donettom@linux.ibm.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Ritesh Harjani <ritesh.list@gmail.com>,
	Xu Xin <xu.xin16@zte.com.cn>,
	Chengming Zhou <chengming.zhou@linux.dev>,
	Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com>,
	Aboorva Devarajan <aboorvad@linux.ibm.com>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Giorgi Tchankvetadze <giorgitchankvetadze1997@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] selftests/mm: Added fork inheritance test for ksm_merging_pages counter
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2025 15:15:39 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <26e38fe5-e6c4-4678-8056-95c0ff4350e6@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f07c901d4b6b1d1c15a8c1bbd324367d6135d0a3.1757946863.git.donettom@linux.ibm.com>

On 15.09.25 17:03, Donet Tom wrote:
> Added a new selftest to verify whether the `ksm_merging_pages` counter
> in `mm_struct` is not inherited by a child process after fork. This helps
> ensure correctness of KSM accounting across process creation.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Donet Tom <donettom@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
>   .../selftests/mm/ksm_functional_tests.c       | 42 ++++++++++++++++++-
>   1 file changed, 41 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/ksm_functional_tests.c b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/ksm_functional_tests.c
> index 712f43c87736..645cefba2126 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/ksm_functional_tests.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/ksm_functional_tests.c
> @@ -602,6 +602,45 @@ static void test_prot_none(void)
>   	munmap(map, size);
>   }
>   
> +static void test_fork_ksm_merging_page_count(void)
> +{
> +	const unsigned int size = 2 * MiB;
> +	char *map;
> +	pid_t child_pid;
> +	int status;
> +
> +	ksft_print_msg("[RUN] %s\n", __func__);
> +
> +	map = mmap_and_merge_range(0xcf, size, PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE, KSM_MERGE_MADVISE);
> +	if (map == MAP_FAILED)
> +		return;
> +
> +	child_pid = fork();
> +	if (!child_pid) {
> +		init_global_file_handles();
> +		exit(ksm_get_self_merging_pages());
> +	} else if (child_pid < 0) {
> +		ksft_test_result_fail("fork() failed\n");
> +		return;

Probably
	goto out;

in all these fail cases

> +	}
> +
> +	if (waitpid(child_pid, &status, 0) < 0) {
> +		ksft_test_result_fail("waitpid() failed\n");
> +		return;
> +	}
> +
> +	status = WEXITSTATUS(status);
> +	if (status) {
> +		ksft_test_result_fail("ksm_merging_page in child: %d\n", status);
> +		return;
> +	}
> +
> +	ksft_test_result_pass("ksm_merging_pages is not inherited after fork\n");
> +

And have

	out:

here

With that:

Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>

-- 
Cheers

David / dhildenb



  reply	other threads:[~2025-09-17 13:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-09-15 15:03 [PATCH v2 0/3] mm/ksm: Fix incorrect accounting of KSM counters during fork Donet Tom
2025-09-15 15:03 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] mm/ksm: Fix incorrect KSM counter handling in mm_struct " Donet Tom
2025-09-15 23:42   ` Andrew Morton
2025-09-16  2:14     ` Joe Perches
2025-09-16  2:54       ` Andrew Morton
2025-09-16  4:33     ` Sasha Levin
2025-09-16  4:41       ` Andrew Morton
2025-09-16 12:45         ` Sasha Levin
2025-09-16  5:50       ` Donet Tom
2025-09-17 10:38   ` David Hildenbrand
2025-09-17 12:27   ` Chengming Zhou
2025-09-15 15:03 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] selftests/mm: Added fork inheritance test for ksm_merging_pages counter Donet Tom
2025-09-17 13:15   ` David Hildenbrand [this message]
2025-09-17 14:45     ` Donet Tom
2025-09-15 15:03 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] selftests/mm: Added fork test to verify global ksm_zero_pages counter behavior Donet Tom
2025-09-17 13:19   ` David Hildenbrand
2025-09-17 14:47     ` Donet Tom

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=26e38fe5-e6c4-4678-8056-95c0ff4350e6@redhat.com \
    --to=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=aboorvad@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=chengming.zhou@linux.dev \
    --cc=donettom@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=giorgitchankvetadze1997@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=richard.weiyang@gmail.com \
    --cc=ritesh.list@gmail.com \
    --cc=xu.xin16@zte.com.cn \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox