linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: J Freyensee <why2jjj.linux@gmail.com>
To: Igor Stoppa <igor.stoppa@huawei.com>,
	david@fromorbit.com, willy@infradead.org, keescook@chromium.org,
	mhocko@kernel.org
Cc: labbott@redhat.com, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/7] lkdtm: crash on overwriting protected pmalloc var
Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2018 09:26:55 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2664691b-4d48-1701-8dae-774ec7733f61@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6378e63e-174f-642e-d319-1d121b74d3d7@huawei.com>



On 3/7/18 5:18 AM, Igor Stoppa wrote:
>
> On 06/03/18 19:20, J Freyensee wrote:
>
>> On 2/28/18 12:06 PM, Igor Stoppa wrote:
> [...]
>
>>>    void __init lkdtm_perms_init(void);
>>>    void lkdtm_WRITE_RO(void);
>>>    void lkdtm_WRITE_RO_AFTER_INIT(void);
>>> +void lkdtm_WRITE_RO_PMALLOC(void);
>> Does this need some sort of #ifdef too?
> Not strictly. It's just a function declaration.
> As long as it is not used, the linker will not complain.
> The #ifdef placed around the use and definition is sufficient, from a
> correctness perspective.
>
> But it's a different question if there is any standard in linux about
> hiding also the declaration.


I'd prefer hiding it if it's contents are being ifdef'ed out, but I 
really think it's more of a maintainer preference question.


>
> I am not very fond of #ifdefs, so when I can I try to avoid them.
>
>


--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2018-03-07 17:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-02-28 20:06 [RFC PATCH v18 0/7] mm: security: ro protection for dynamic data Igor Stoppa
2018-02-28 20:06 ` [PATCH 1/7] genalloc: track beginning of allocations Igor Stoppa
2018-03-02 16:37   ` kbuild test robot
2018-03-02 16:47   ` kbuild test robot
2018-03-05 19:00   ` J Freyensee
2018-03-06 17:39     ` Igor Stoppa
2018-03-06 13:19   ` Mike Rapoport
2018-03-06 14:13     ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-03-07 14:48     ` Igor Stoppa
2018-03-07 15:46       ` Igor Stoppa
2018-03-07 17:44       ` Mike Rapoprt
2018-03-06 14:10   ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-03-06 16:05     ` Igor Stoppa
2018-03-07 10:51       ` Igor Stoppa
2018-02-28 20:06 ` [PATCH 2/7] genalloc: selftest Igor Stoppa
2018-03-05 19:37   ` J Freyensee
2018-02-28 20:06 ` [PATCH 3/7] struct page: add field for vm_struct Igor Stoppa
2018-03-03  2:35   ` kbuild test robot
2018-03-05 20:31   ` J Freyensee
2018-02-28 20:06 ` [PATCH 4/7] Protectable Memory Igor Stoppa
2018-03-06  3:59   ` J Freyensee
2018-03-07 14:07     ` Igor Stoppa
2018-03-12 19:13   ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-03-12 21:25     ` Igor Stoppa
2018-02-28 20:06 ` [PATCH 5/7] Pmalloc selftest Igor Stoppa
2018-03-03  6:59   ` kbuild test robot
2018-03-06 17:13   ` J Freyensee
2018-02-28 20:06 ` [PATCH 6/7] lkdtm: crash on overwriting protected pmalloc var Igor Stoppa
2018-03-06 17:20   ` J Freyensee
2018-03-07 13:18     ` Igor Stoppa
2018-03-07 17:26       ` J Freyensee [this message]
2018-02-28 20:06 ` [PATCH 7/7] Documentation for Pmalloc Igor Stoppa
2018-03-06 13:30   ` Mike Rapoport
2018-03-06 17:33   ` J Freyensee
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2018-02-23 14:48 [RFC PATCH v17 0/7] mm: security: ro protection for dynamic data Igor Stoppa
2018-02-23 14:48 ` [PATCH 6/7] lkdtm: crash on overwriting protected pmalloc var Igor Stoppa
2018-02-25  3:46   ` kbuild test robot
2018-03-06 17:05   ` J Freyensee
2018-03-06 17:08     ` J Freyensee

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2664691b-4d48-1701-8dae-774ec7733f61@gmail.com \
    --to=why2jjj.linux@gmail.com \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=igor.stoppa@huawei.com \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com \
    --cc=labbott@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox