From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wm0-f69.google.com (mail-wm0-f69.google.com [74.125.82.69]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88F016B0279 for ; Wed, 24 May 2017 03:49:55 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-wm0-f69.google.com with SMTP id c202so36204288wme.10 for ; Wed, 24 May 2017 00:49:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mx1.suse.de (mx2.suse.de. [195.135.220.15]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id l1si17034911eda.249.2017.05.24.00.49.54 for (version=TLS1 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 24 May 2017 00:49:54 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: mm, we use rcu access task_struct in mm_match_cgroup(), but not use rcu free in free_task_struct() References: <5924E4A7.7000601@huawei.com> <59250EA3.60905@huawei.com> From: Vlastimil Babka Message-ID: <263518b9-5a39-1af9-ac9e-055da3384aef@suse.cz> Date: Wed, 24 May 2017 09:49:18 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <59250EA3.60905@huawei.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Xishi Qiu , Michal Hocko , Mel Gorman , Hugh Dickins , Minchan Kim , "wencongyang (A)" , Johannes Weiner , Dmitry Vyukov , zhong jiang Cc: Linux MM , LKML On 05/24/2017 06:40 AM, Xishi Qiu wrote: > On 2017/5/24 9:40, Xishi Qiu wrote: > >> Hi, I find we use rcu access task_struct in mm_match_cgroup(), but not use >> rcu free in free_task_struct(), is it right? >> >> Here is the backtrace. Can you post the whole oops, including kernel version etc? Is it the same 3.10 RH kernel as in the other report? -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org