linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Martin J. Bligh" <mbligh@aracnet.com>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Cc: Bill Davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com>,
	Dave McCracken <dmccr@us.ibm.com>, Andrew Morton <akpm@digeo.com>,
	Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Memory Management <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.5.43-mm2] New shared page table patch
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 22:55:57 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2629464880.1035240956@[10.10.2.3]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m17kgbuo0i.fsf@frodo.biederman.org>

>> >> In many cases, this will stop the box from falling over flat on it's 
>> >> face due to ZONE_NORMAL exhaustion (from pte-chains), or even total
>> >> RAM exhaustion (from PTEs). Thus the performance gain is infinite ;-)
>> > 
>> > So why has no one written a pte_chain reaper?  It is perfectly sane
>> > to allocate a swap entry and move an entire pte_chain to the swap
>> > cache.  
>> 
>> I think the underlying subsystem does not easily allow for dynamic regeneration,
>> so it's non-trivial. 
> 
> We swap pages out all of the time in 2.4.x, and that is all I was suggesting 
> swap out some but not all of the pages, on a very long pte_chain.  And swapping
> out a page is not terribly complex, unless something very drastic has changed.

Right, it's swapping out the controlling structures without swapping
out the pages themselves that's harder.
 
>> IMHO, it's better not to fill memory with crap in the first place than
>> to invent complex methods of managing and shrinking it afterwards. You
>> only get into pathalogical conditions under sharing situation, else 
>> it's limited to about 1% of RAM (bad, but manageable) ... thus providing
>> this sort of sharing nixes the worst of it. Better cache warmth on 
>> switches (for TLB misses), faster fork+exec, etc. are nice side-effects.
> 
> I will agree with that if everything works so the sharing happens,
> this is a nice feature.

I think it will for most of the situations we run aground with now
(normally 5000 oracle tasks sharing a 2Gb shared segment, or some
such monster).
 
>> The ultimate solution is per-object reverse mappings, rather than per
>> page, but that's a 2.7 thingy now.
> ???
> 
> Last I checked we already had those in 2.4.x, and still in 2.5.x.  The
> list of place the address space is mapped.

It's more complicated than that ... I'll let Rik or one of the K42
guys who understand it better than I do explain it (yeah, I'm wimping
out on you ;-))

M.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/

  reply	other threads:[~2002-10-22  5:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-10-18 23:06 Dave McCracken
2002-10-19  1:32 ` Ed Tomlinson
2002-10-19 19:17 ` Bill Davidsen
2002-10-19 19:36   ` Dave McCracken
2002-10-20  4:20     ` Eric W. Biederman
2002-10-20  6:18   ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-10-21 14:55     ` Eric W. Biederman
2002-10-21 15:21       ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-10-22  3:54         ` Eric W. Biederman
2002-10-22  5:55           ` Martin J. Bligh [this message]
2002-10-22 16:09             ` Rik van Riel
2002-10-22 16:14               ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-10-22 18:06                 ` Bill Davidsen
2002-10-22 19:02                   ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-10-22 19:21                     ` Dave McCracken
2002-10-24 10:50                       ` Bill Davidsen
2002-10-24 14:22                         ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-10-24 14:38                           ` Dave McCracken
2002-10-24 14:51                             ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-10-25 17:31                           ` Bill Davidsen
2002-10-24 10:42                     ` Bill Davidsen
2002-10-22 17:19               ` Benjamin LaHaise
2002-10-22 17:36                 ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-10-22 17:45                   ` Benjamin LaHaise
2002-10-22 17:56                     ` Andrew Morton
2002-10-22 18:01                       ` Benjamin LaHaise
2002-10-22 19:03                         ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-10-22 20:23                           ` Alan Cox
2002-10-22 21:33                             ` Gerrit Huizenga
2002-10-22 18:22                     ` Alan Cox
2002-10-22 18:47                       ` Gerrit Huizenga
2002-10-22 18:55                         ` Benjamin LaHaise
2002-10-22 19:27                           ` Gerrit Huizenga
2002-10-22 19:29                             ` Benjamin LaHaise
2002-10-22 19:56                             ` Arjan van de Ven
2002-10-22 14:26           ` Rik van Riel
2002-10-22 17:09             ` Andrew Morton
2002-10-22 17:15               ` Rik van Riel
2002-10-22 18:36                 ` Dave McCracken
2002-10-22 18:49                   ` Andrew Morton
2002-10-22 19:06                     ` Gerrit Huizenga
2002-10-22 19:29                       ` Dave McCracken
2002-10-22 19:11                   ` Ulrich Drepper
2002-10-22 19:29                     ` Gerrit Huizenga
2002-10-22 18:45               ` Gerrit Huizenga
2002-10-22 17:54             ` Bill Davidsen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='2629464880.1035240956@[10.10.2.3]' \
    --to=mbligh@aracnet.com \
    --cc=akpm@digeo.com \
    --cc=davidsen@tmr.com \
    --cc=dmccr@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox