From: "Martin J. Bligh" <mbligh@aracnet.com>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Cc: Bill Davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com>,
Dave McCracken <dmccr@us.ibm.com>, Andrew Morton <akpm@digeo.com>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Memory Management <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.5.43-mm2] New shared page table patch
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 22:55:57 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2629464880.1035240956@[10.10.2.3]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m17kgbuo0i.fsf@frodo.biederman.org>
>> >> In many cases, this will stop the box from falling over flat on it's
>> >> face due to ZONE_NORMAL exhaustion (from pte-chains), or even total
>> >> RAM exhaustion (from PTEs). Thus the performance gain is infinite ;-)
>> >
>> > So why has no one written a pte_chain reaper? It is perfectly sane
>> > to allocate a swap entry and move an entire pte_chain to the swap
>> > cache.
>>
>> I think the underlying subsystem does not easily allow for dynamic regeneration,
>> so it's non-trivial.
>
> We swap pages out all of the time in 2.4.x, and that is all I was suggesting
> swap out some but not all of the pages, on a very long pte_chain. And swapping
> out a page is not terribly complex, unless something very drastic has changed.
Right, it's swapping out the controlling structures without swapping
out the pages themselves that's harder.
>> IMHO, it's better not to fill memory with crap in the first place than
>> to invent complex methods of managing and shrinking it afterwards. You
>> only get into pathalogical conditions under sharing situation, else
>> it's limited to about 1% of RAM (bad, but manageable) ... thus providing
>> this sort of sharing nixes the worst of it. Better cache warmth on
>> switches (for TLB misses), faster fork+exec, etc. are nice side-effects.
>
> I will agree with that if everything works so the sharing happens,
> this is a nice feature.
I think it will for most of the situations we run aground with now
(normally 5000 oracle tasks sharing a 2Gb shared segment, or some
such monster).
>> The ultimate solution is per-object reverse mappings, rather than per
>> page, but that's a 2.7 thingy now.
> ???
>
> Last I checked we already had those in 2.4.x, and still in 2.5.x. The
> list of place the address space is mapped.
It's more complicated than that ... I'll let Rik or one of the K42
guys who understand it better than I do explain it (yeah, I'm wimping
out on you ;-))
M.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-10-22 5:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-10-18 23:06 Dave McCracken
2002-10-19 1:32 ` Ed Tomlinson
2002-10-19 19:17 ` Bill Davidsen
2002-10-19 19:36 ` Dave McCracken
2002-10-20 4:20 ` Eric W. Biederman
2002-10-20 6:18 ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-10-21 14:55 ` Eric W. Biederman
2002-10-21 15:21 ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-10-22 3:54 ` Eric W. Biederman
2002-10-22 5:55 ` Martin J. Bligh [this message]
2002-10-22 16:09 ` Rik van Riel
2002-10-22 16:14 ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-10-22 18:06 ` Bill Davidsen
2002-10-22 19:02 ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-10-22 19:21 ` Dave McCracken
2002-10-24 10:50 ` Bill Davidsen
2002-10-24 14:22 ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-10-24 14:38 ` Dave McCracken
2002-10-24 14:51 ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-10-25 17:31 ` Bill Davidsen
2002-10-24 10:42 ` Bill Davidsen
2002-10-22 17:19 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2002-10-22 17:36 ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-10-22 17:45 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2002-10-22 17:56 ` Andrew Morton
2002-10-22 18:01 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2002-10-22 19:03 ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-10-22 20:23 ` Alan Cox
2002-10-22 21:33 ` Gerrit Huizenga
2002-10-22 18:22 ` Alan Cox
2002-10-22 18:47 ` Gerrit Huizenga
2002-10-22 18:55 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2002-10-22 19:27 ` Gerrit Huizenga
2002-10-22 19:29 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2002-10-22 19:56 ` Arjan van de Ven
2002-10-22 14:26 ` Rik van Riel
2002-10-22 17:09 ` Andrew Morton
2002-10-22 17:15 ` Rik van Riel
2002-10-22 18:36 ` Dave McCracken
2002-10-22 18:49 ` Andrew Morton
2002-10-22 19:06 ` Gerrit Huizenga
2002-10-22 19:29 ` Dave McCracken
2002-10-22 19:11 ` Ulrich Drepper
2002-10-22 19:29 ` Gerrit Huizenga
2002-10-22 18:45 ` Gerrit Huizenga
2002-10-22 17:54 ` Bill Davidsen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='2629464880.1035240956@[10.10.2.3]' \
--to=mbligh@aracnet.com \
--cc=akpm@digeo.com \
--cc=davidsen@tmr.com \
--cc=dmccr@us.ibm.com \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox