From: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
To: Alex Sierra <alex.sierra@amd.com>, Alistair Popple <apopple@nvidia.com>
Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>,
Ralph Campbell <rcampbell@nvidia.com>,
Ralph Campbell <rcampbell@nvidia.com>,
Felix Kuehling <Felix.Kuehling@amd.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com>,
"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
"open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK"
<linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org>, Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Subject: hmm_test issues with latest mainline
Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2022 18:54:24 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <26017fe3-5ad7-6946-57db-e5ec48063ceb@suse.cz> (raw)
Hi,
I've been trying the hmm_tests as of today's commit:
a185a0995518 ("Merge tag 'linux-kselftest-kunit-6.1-rc1-2' ...)
and run into several issues that seemed worth reporting.
First, it seems the FIXTURE_TEARDOWN(hmm) in
tools/testing/selftests/vm/hmm-tests.c
using ASSERT_EQ(ret, 0); can run into an infinite loop of reporting the
assertion failure. Dunno if it's a kselftests issue or it's a bug to
use asserts in teardown. I hacked it up like this locally to proceed:
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/vm/hmm-tests.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/vm/hmm-tests.c
@@ -154,6 +154,11 @@ FIXTURE_TEARDOWN(hmm)
{
int ret = close(self->fd);
+ if (ret != 0) {
+ fprintf(stderr, "close returned (%d) fd is (%d)\n", ret,self->fd);
+ exit(1);
+ }
+
ASSERT_EQ(ret, 0);
self->fd = -1;
}
Next, there are some tests that fail (and thus also trigger the issue above)
# RUN hmm.hmm_device_private.exclusive ...
# hmm-tests.c:1702:exclusive:Expected ret (-16) == 0 (0)
close returned (-1) fd is (3)
# exclusive: Test failed at step #1
# FAIL hmm.hmm_device_private.exclusive
not ok 20 hmm.hmm_device_private.exclusive
# RUN hmm.hmm_device_private.exclusive_mprotect ...
# hmm-tests.c:1756:exclusive_mprotect:Expected ret (-16) == 0 (0)
close returned (-1) fd is (3)
# exclusive_mprotect: Test failed at step #1
# FAIL hmm.hmm_device_private.exclusive_mprotect
not ok 21 hmm.hmm_device_private.exclusive_mprotect
# RUN hmm.hmm_device_private.exclusive_cow ...
# hmm-tests.c:1809:exclusive_cow:Expected ret (-16) == 0 (0)
close returned (-1) fd is (3)
# exclusive_cow: Test failed at step #1
# FAIL hmm.hmm_device_private.exclusive_cow
not ok 22 hmm.hmm_device_private.exclusive_cow
I'll try to check more closely but maybe if you can reproduce it too, you'll
have more idea what's going on.
The next thing is more of a question/documentation suggestion. Tons of tests
fail like this:
ok 24 hmm.hmm_device_private.hmm_cow_in_device
# RUN hmm.hmm_device_coherent.open_close ...
could not open hmm dmirror driver (/dev/hmm_dmirror2)
# SKIP DEVICE_COHERENT not available
# OK hmm.hmm_device_coherent.open_close
I assume this is because I run "test_hmm.sh smoke" without the SPM parameters.
The help message doesn't say much about what to specify there for
<spm_addr_dev0> <spm_addr_dev1>. Do these tests need a particular hardware?
(unlike the rest?) Maybe it could be clarified.
Last thing, I noticed all these DEVICE_COHERENT tests ultimately count as OK,
not SKIPPED, which would probably be more appropriate?
# FAILED: 51 / 54 tests passed.
# Totals: pass:50 fail:3 xfail:0 xpass:0 skip:1 error:0
(the skip:1 is due to test 9 "# SKIP Huge page could not be allocated"
which is probably a misconfiguration on my part so I don't report that as an issue)
Thanks,
Vlastimil
next reply other threads:[~2022-10-13 16:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-10-13 16:54 Vlastimil Babka [this message]
2022-10-13 17:01 ` David Hildenbrand
2022-10-13 17:10 ` Shuah Khan
2022-10-13 17:12 ` Vlastimil Babka
2022-10-13 17:29 ` Shuah Khan
2022-10-13 17:45 ` Vlastimil Babka
2022-10-13 18:00 ` David Hildenbrand
2022-10-13 19:38 ` Shuah Khan
2022-10-13 19:43 ` Vlastimil Babka
2022-10-14 1:45 ` Alistair Popple
2022-10-14 3:21 ` Alistair Popple
2022-10-14 6:53 ` Vlastimil Babka
2022-10-14 6:45 ` Vlastimil Babka
2022-10-13 17:03 ` Shuah Khan
2022-10-13 17:10 ` Vlastimil Babka
2022-10-14 12:01 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-10-14 15:03 ` Felix Kuehling
2022-10-14 15:47 ` Jason Gunthorpe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=26017fe3-5ad7-6946-57db-e5ec48063ceb@suse.cz \
--to=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=Felix.Kuehling@amd.com \
--cc=alex.sierra@amd.com \
--cc=apopple@nvidia.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=jglisse@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=rcampbell@nvidia.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox