linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
To: Alex Sierra <alex.sierra@amd.com>, Alistair Popple <apopple@nvidia.com>
Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>,
	Ralph Campbell <rcampbell@nvidia.com>,
	Ralph Campbell <rcampbell@nvidia.com>,
	Felix Kuehling <Felix.Kuehling@amd.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com>,
	"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	"open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK"
	<linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org>, Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
	David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Subject: hmm_test issues with latest mainline
Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2022 18:54:24 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <26017fe3-5ad7-6946-57db-e5ec48063ceb@suse.cz> (raw)

Hi,

I've been trying the hmm_tests as of today's commit:

a185a0995518 ("Merge tag 'linux-kselftest-kunit-6.1-rc1-2' ...)

and run into several issues that seemed worth reporting.

First, it seems the FIXTURE_TEARDOWN(hmm) in
tools/testing/selftests/vm/hmm-tests.c
using ASSERT_EQ(ret, 0); can run into an infinite loop of reporting the
assertion failure. Dunno if it's a kselftests issue or it's a bug to
use asserts in teardown. I hacked it up like this locally to proceed:

--- a/tools/testing/selftests/vm/hmm-tests.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/vm/hmm-tests.c
@@ -154,6 +154,11 @@ FIXTURE_TEARDOWN(hmm)
 {
 	int ret = close(self->fd);
 
+	if (ret != 0) {
+		fprintf(stderr, "close returned (%d) fd is (%d)\n", ret,self->fd);
+		exit(1);
+	}
+
 	ASSERT_EQ(ret, 0);
 	self->fd = -1;
 }

Next, there are some tests that fail (and thus also trigger the issue above)

#  RUN           hmm.hmm_device_private.exclusive ...
# hmm-tests.c:1702:exclusive:Expected ret (-16) == 0 (0)
close returned (-1) fd is (3)
# exclusive: Test failed at step #1
#          FAIL  hmm.hmm_device_private.exclusive
not ok 20 hmm.hmm_device_private.exclusive
#  RUN           hmm.hmm_device_private.exclusive_mprotect ...
# hmm-tests.c:1756:exclusive_mprotect:Expected ret (-16) == 0 (0)
close returned (-1) fd is (3)
# exclusive_mprotect: Test failed at step #1
#          FAIL  hmm.hmm_device_private.exclusive_mprotect
not ok 21 hmm.hmm_device_private.exclusive_mprotect
#  RUN           hmm.hmm_device_private.exclusive_cow ...
# hmm-tests.c:1809:exclusive_cow:Expected ret (-16) == 0 (0)
close returned (-1) fd is (3)
# exclusive_cow: Test failed at step #1
#          FAIL  hmm.hmm_device_private.exclusive_cow
not ok 22 hmm.hmm_device_private.exclusive_cow

I'll try to check more closely but maybe if you can reproduce it too, you'll
have more idea what's going on.

The next thing is more of a question/documentation suggestion. Tons of tests
fail like this:

ok 24 hmm.hmm_device_private.hmm_cow_in_device
#  RUN           hmm.hmm_device_coherent.open_close ...
could not open hmm dmirror driver (/dev/hmm_dmirror2)
#      SKIP      DEVICE_COHERENT not available
#            OK  hmm.hmm_device_coherent.open_close

I assume this is because I run "test_hmm.sh smoke" without the SPM parameters.
The help message doesn't say much about what to specify there for
<spm_addr_dev0> <spm_addr_dev1>. Do these tests need a particular hardware?
(unlike the rest?) Maybe it could be clarified.

Last thing, I noticed all these DEVICE_COHERENT tests ultimately count as OK,
not SKIPPED, which would probably be more appropriate?

# FAILED: 51 / 54 tests passed.
# Totals: pass:50 fail:3 xfail:0 xpass:0 skip:1 error:0

(the skip:1 is due to test 9 "#      SKIP      Huge page could not be allocated"
which is probably a misconfiguration on my part so I don't report that as an issue)

Thanks,
Vlastimil


             reply	other threads:[~2022-10-13 16:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-10-13 16:54 Vlastimil Babka [this message]
2022-10-13 17:01 ` David Hildenbrand
2022-10-13 17:10   ` Shuah Khan
2022-10-13 17:12     ` Vlastimil Babka
2022-10-13 17:29       ` Shuah Khan
2022-10-13 17:45       ` Vlastimil Babka
2022-10-13 18:00         ` David Hildenbrand
2022-10-13 19:38           ` Shuah Khan
2022-10-13 19:43             ` Vlastimil Babka
2022-10-14  1:45               ` Alistair Popple
2022-10-14  3:21                 ` Alistair Popple
2022-10-14  6:53                   ` Vlastimil Babka
2022-10-14  6:45           ` Vlastimil Babka
2022-10-13 17:03 ` Shuah Khan
2022-10-13 17:10   ` Vlastimil Babka
2022-10-14 12:01 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-10-14 15:03   ` Felix Kuehling
2022-10-14 15:47     ` Jason Gunthorpe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=26017fe3-5ad7-6946-57db-e5ec48063ceb@suse.cz \
    --to=vbabka@suse.cz \
    --cc=Felix.Kuehling@amd.com \
    --cc=alex.sierra@amd.com \
    --cc=apopple@nvidia.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
    --cc=jglisse@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=rcampbell@nvidia.com \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox