From: Alex Bligh - linux-kernel <linux-kernel@alex.org.uk>
To: Mark Hemment <markhe@veritas.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@transmeta.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
Alex Bligh - linux-kernel <linux-kernel@alex.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] allocation looping + kswapd CPU cycles
Date: Tue, 08 May 2001 15:54:05 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2523472481.989337245@[192.168.199.16]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0105081225520.31900-100000@alloc>
> The real fix is to measure fragmentation and the progress of kswapd, but
> that is too drastic for 2.4.x.
I suspect the real fix might, in general, be
a) to reduce use of kmalloc() etc. which gives
physically contiguous memory, where virtually
contiguous memory will do (and is, presumably,
far easier to come by). (or perhaps add some
flag to kmalloc to allocate out of virtual
rather than physical memory).
b) to bias flush or swap out routines to create
physically contiguous higher order blocks.
Many heuristics will give you that ability.
Disclaimer: I haven't looked at this for issue for years,
but Linux seems to fail on >4k allocations now, and
fragment memory far more, than it did on much smaller
systems doing lots of nasty (8k, thus 3 pages including
header) NFS stuff back in 94.
--
Alex Bligh
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux.eu.org/Linux-MM/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-05-08 14:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-05-08 11:56 Mark Hemment
2001-05-08 14:54 ` Alex Bligh - linux-kernel [this message]
2001-05-08 17:23 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2001-05-08 19:21 ` Jens Axboe
2001-05-08 20:25 ` David S. Miller
2001-05-09 9:46 ` Mark Hemment
2001-05-09 16:36 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2001-05-10 8:41 ` Mark Hemment
2001-05-10 16:43 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2001-05-10 19:52 ` Stephen C. Tweedie
2001-05-10 18:22 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2001-05-10 20:19 ` Stephen C. Tweedie
2001-05-10 18:49 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2001-05-10 20:52 ` Stephen C. Tweedie
2001-05-12 14:56 ` Rik van Riel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='2523472481.989337245@[192.168.199.16]' \
--to=linux-kernel@alex.org.uk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=markhe@veritas.com \
--cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox