linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@arndb.de>
To: "John Paul Adrian Glaubitz" <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de>,
	"Richard Henderson" <richard.henderson@linaro.org>,
	"Matt Turner" <mattst88@gmail.com>,
	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
	"Kees Cook" <kees@kernel.org>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
	linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "Michael Cree" <mcree@orcon.net.nz>, "Sam James" <sam@gentoo.org>,
	"Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@orcam.me.uk>,
	"Geert Uytterhoeven" <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
	"Michael Karcher" <kernel@mkarcher.dialup.fu-berlin.de>,
	"Chris Hofstaedtler" <zeha@debian.org>,
	util-linux@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] alpha: Fix personality flag propagation across an exec
Date: Thu, 09 Jan 2025 09:01:16 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <24f03227-1b55-4e50-b6e9-7ac74fda2602@app.fastmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250103140148.370368-1-glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de>

On Fri, Jan 3, 2025, at 15:01, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:

> 
>  #define SET_PERSONALITY(EX)					\
> -	set_personality(((EX).e_flags & EF_ALPHA_32BIT)		\
> -	   ? PER_LINUX_32BIT : PER_LINUX)
> +	set_personality((((EX).e_flags & EF_ALPHA_32BIT)	\
> +	   ? PER_LINUX_32BIT : PER_LINUX) | (current->personality & (~PER_MASK)))

This looks wrong to me: since ADDR_LIMIT_32BIT is not part of
PER_MASK, executing a regular binary from a taso binary no longer
reverts back to the entire 64-bit address space.

It seems that the behavior on most other architectures changed in 2012
commit 16f3e95b3209 ("cross-arch: don't corrupt personality flags upon
exec()").

At the time, the same bug existed on mips, parisc and tile, but those
got fixed quickly.

There are two related bits I don't quite understand:

- Do we still care about EF_ALPHA_32BIT? I see that it gets set by
 "alpha-linux-ld.bfd --taso", but could not find any documentation
 on what that flag is actually good for. On all other architectures,
 the address space limit gets enforced through a per-thread setting
 like TIF_32BIT, not through the personality that gets inherited
 by the child processes.

- all architectures other than x86 mask out the lower byte. Why
  not that one?

       Arnd


  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-01-09  8:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-01-03 14:01 John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
2025-01-08 22:49 ` Kees Cook
2025-01-09  0:52   ` Jeff Xu
2025-01-09  8:01 ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2025-01-09  8:43   ` Arnd Bergmann
2025-01-09  8:46     ` John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
2025-01-09  8:56       ` Arnd Bergmann
2025-01-09  9:12         ` John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
2025-01-09 16:18           ` Eric W. Biederman
2025-01-09 16:52             ` Arnd Bergmann
2025-01-09 17:17               ` Eric W. Biederman
2025-01-09 20:10             ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2025-01-09 20:53               ` Arnd Bergmann
2025-01-12 14:40                 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2025-01-10  0:28             ` Richard Henderson
2025-01-11  0:16           ` [PATCH] alpha/elf: Fix misc/setarch test of util-linux by removing 32bit support Eric W. Biederman
2025-01-11  1:17             ` Richard Henderson
2025-01-11 10:37             ` John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
2025-01-12 14:40               ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2025-01-12 14:56                 ` John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
2025-01-13  5:39                   ` [PATCH v2] " Eric W. Biederman
2025-01-18 10:35                     ` Ivan Kokshaysky
2025-01-26 17:15                       ` John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
2025-01-27 13:27                         ` Ivan Kokshaysky
2025-02-03 11:55                     ` John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
2025-02-06 15:42                     ` Kees Cook
2025-01-11 11:26             ` [PATCH] " Arnd Bergmann
2025-01-11 15:27             ` Ivan Kokshaysky
2025-01-13  5:32               ` Eric W. Biederman
2025-01-11 21:26             ` John Paul Adrian Glaubitz

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=24f03227-1b55-4e50-b6e9-7ac74fda2602@app.fastmail.com \
    --to=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
    --cc=glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de \
    --cc=kees@kernel.org \
    --cc=kernel@mkarcher.dialup.fu-berlin.de \
    --cc=linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=macro@orcam.me.uk \
    --cc=mattst88@gmail.com \
    --cc=mcree@orcon.net.nz \
    --cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=richard.henderson@linaro.org \
    --cc=sam@gentoo.org \
    --cc=util-linux@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=zeha@debian.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox