From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Sat, 20 Jul 2002 15:48:59 -0700 From: "Martin J. Bligh" Reply-To: "Martin J. Bligh" Subject: Re: [PATCH] for_each_pgdat Message-ID: <244469929.1027180137@[10.10.2.3]> In-Reply-To: <1027201039.1085.812.camel@sinai> References: <1027201039.1085.812.camel@sinai> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Robert Love , Linus Torvalds Cc: William Lee Irwin III , akpm@zip.com.au, riel@conectiva.com.br, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: >> Ok guys, you three (and whoever else wants to play? ;) fight it out amonst >> yourselves, I'll wait for the end result (iow: I'll just ignore both >> patches for now). > > No no... the issues are fairly orthogonal. > > Attached is a patch with the for_each_pgdat implementation and > s/node_next/pgdat_next/ per Martin. I'm happy with this (obviously ;-)) > If Bill wants to convert pgdats to lists that is fine but is another > step. Let's get in this first batch and that can be done off this. As we now reference them in only two places (the macro defn and numa.c:_alloc_pages) it hardly seems worth converting to lists ... ? (I'm going to take an axe to NUMA _alloc_pages in a minute anyway ;-)) M. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/