linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chengming Zhou <chengming.zhou@linux.dev>
To: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>, cl@linux.com, penberg@kernel.org
Cc: rientjes@google.com, iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, roman.gushchin@linux.dev,
	42.hyeyoo@gmail.com, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@bytedance.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 2/7] slub: Prepare __slab_free() for unfrozen partial slab out of node partial list
Date: Sat, 28 Oct 2023 09:35:55 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <23f21bf1-0f27-4091-b889-bf43290fa6f3@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <43da5c9a-aeff-1bff-81a8-4611470c2514@suse.cz>

On 2023/10/27 23:18, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> On 10/24/23 11:33, chengming.zhou@linux.dev wrote:
>> From: Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@bytedance.com>
>>
>> Now the partial slub will be frozen when taken out of node partial list,
> 
> 	  partially empty slab
> 
>> so the __slab_free() will know from "was_frozen" that the partial slab
>> is not on node partial list and is used by one kmem_cache_cpu.
> 
> 				... is a cpu or cpu partial slab of some cpu.
> 
>> But we will change this, make partial slabs leave the node partial list
>> with unfrozen state, so we need to change __slab_free() to use the new
>> slab_test_node_partial() we just introduced.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@bytedance.com>
>> ---
>>  mm/slub.c | 11 +++++++++++
>>  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c
>> index 3fad4edca34b..f568a32d7332 100644
>> --- a/mm/slub.c
>> +++ b/mm/slub.c
>> @@ -3610,6 +3610,7 @@ static void __slab_free(struct kmem_cache *s, struct slab *slab,
>>  	unsigned long counters;
>>  	struct kmem_cache_node *n = NULL;
>>  	unsigned long flags;
>> +	bool on_node_partial;
>>  
>>  	stat(s, FREE_SLOWPATH);
>>  
>> @@ -3657,6 +3658,7 @@ static void __slab_free(struct kmem_cache *s, struct slab *slab,
>>  				 */
>>  				spin_lock_irqsave(&n->list_lock, flags);
>>  
>> +				on_node_partial = slab_test_node_partial(slab);
>>  			}
>>  		}
>>  
>> @@ -3685,6 +3687,15 @@ static void __slab_free(struct kmem_cache *s, struct slab *slab,
>>  		return;
>>  	}
>>  
>> +	/*
>> +	 * This slab was partial but not on the per-node partial list,
> 
> This slab was partially empty ...
> 
> Otherwise LGTM!

Ok, will fix.

Thanks!

> 
>> +	 * in which case we shouldn't manipulate its list, just return.
>> +	 */
>> +	if (prior && !on_node_partial) {
>> +		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&n->list_lock, flags);
>> +		return;
>> +	}
>> +
>>  	if (unlikely(!new.inuse && n->nr_partial >= s->min_partial))
>>  		goto slab_empty;
>>  
> 


  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-10-28  1:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-10-24  9:33 [RFC PATCH v3 0/7] slub: Delay freezing of CPU partial slabs chengming.zhou
2023-10-24  9:33 ` [RFC PATCH v3 1/7] slub: Keep track of whether slub is on the per-node partial list chengming.zhou
     [not found]   ` <6d054dbe-c90d-591d-11ca-b9ad3787683d@suse.cz>
2023-10-28  1:30     ` Chengming Zhou
2023-10-24  9:33 ` [RFC PATCH v3 2/7] slub: Prepare __slab_free() for unfrozen partial slab out of node " chengming.zhou
     [not found]   ` <43da5c9a-aeff-1bff-81a8-4611470c2514@suse.cz>
2023-10-28  1:35     ` Chengming Zhou [this message]
2023-10-24  9:33 ` [RFC PATCH v3 3/7] slub: Reflow ___slab_alloc() chengming.zhou
2023-10-24  9:33 ` [RFC PATCH v3 4/7] slub: Change get_partial() interfaces to return slab chengming.zhou
2023-10-30 16:55   ` Vlastimil Babka
2023-10-31  2:22     ` Chengming Zhou
2023-10-24  9:33 ` [RFC PATCH v3 5/7] slub: Introduce freeze_slab() chengming.zhou
2023-10-30 18:11   ` Vlastimil Babka
2023-10-24  9:33 ` [RFC PATCH v3 6/7] slub: Delay freezing of partial slabs chengming.zhou
2023-10-25  2:18   ` Chengming Zhou
2023-10-26  5:49   ` kernel test robot
2023-10-26  7:41     ` Chengming Zhou
2023-10-31  9:50   ` Vlastimil Babka
2023-10-24  9:33 ` [RFC PATCH v3 7/7] slub: Optimize deactivate_slab() chengming.zhou
2023-10-31 11:15   ` Vlastimil Babka
2023-10-31 11:41     ` Chengming Zhou
2023-10-27 17:57 ` [RFC PATCH v3 0/7] slub: Delay freezing of CPU partial slabs Christoph Lameter
2023-10-28  2:36   ` Chengming Zhou
2023-10-30 16:19     ` Vlastimil Babka
2023-10-31  2:29       ` Chengming Zhou
2023-10-30 19:25     ` Christoph Lameter
2023-10-31  2:50       ` Chengming Zhou
2023-10-31  3:47         ` Christoph Lameter
2023-10-31  4:57           ` Chengming Zhou

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=23f21bf1-0f27-4091-b889-bf43290fa6f3@linux.dev \
    --to=chengming.zhou@linux.dev \
    --cc=42.hyeyoo@gmail.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=cl@linux.com \
    --cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=penberg@kernel.org \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    --cc=zhouchengming@bytedance.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox