From: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>
To: Kevin Brodsky <kevin.brodsky@arm.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Andreas Larsson <andreas@gaisler.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>, Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>,
"Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@oracle.com>,
Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com>,
Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>, Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>,
Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
"Ritesh Harjani (IBM)" <ritesh.list@gmail.com>,
Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>,
Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Venkat Rao Bagalkote <venkat88@linux.ibm.com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Yeoreum Yun <yeoreum.yun@arm.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org,
xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, x86@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 08/12] mm: enable lazy_mmu sections to nest
Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2025 14:55:54 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <23dcf752-0b75-45a7-84f8-25bddf97af08-agordeev@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251124132228.622678-9-kevin.brodsky@arm.com>
On Mon, Nov 24, 2025 at 01:22:24PM +0000, Kevin Brodsky wrote:
...
> + * Nesting is permitted: <code> may itself use an enable()/disable() pair.
> + * A nested call to enable() has no functional effect; however disable() causes
> + * any batched architectural state to be flushed regardless of nesting. After a
> + * call to disable(), the caller can therefore rely on all previous page table
> + * modifications to have taken effect, but the lazy MMU mode may still be
> + * enabled.
> + *
> + * In certain cases, it may be desirable to temporarily pause the lazy MMU mode.
> + * This can be done using:
> + *
> + * lazy_mmu_mode_pause();
> + * <code>
> + * lazy_mmu_mode_resume();
> + *
> + * pause() ensures that the mode is exited regardless of the nesting level;
> + * resume() re-enters the mode at the same nesting level. Any call to the
> + * lazy_mmu_mode_* API between those two calls has no effect. In particular,
> + * this means that pause()/resume() pairs may nest.
> + *
> + * in_lazy_mmu_mode() can be used to check whether the lazy MMU mode is
> + * currently enabled.
The in_lazy_mmu_mode() name looks ambiguous to me. When the lazy MMU mode
is paused are we still in lazy MMU mode? The __task_lazy_mmu_mode_active()
implementation suggests we are not, while one could still assume we are,
just paused.
Should in_lazy_mmu_mode() be named e.g. as in_active_lazy_mmu_mode() such
a confusion would not occur in the first place.
> */
...
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_LAZY_MMU_MODE
> +/**
> + * __task_lazy_mmu_mode_active() - Test the lazy MMU mode state for a task.
> + * @tsk: The task to check.
> + *
> + * Test whether @tsk has its lazy MMU mode state set to active (i.e. enabled
> + * and not paused).
> + *
> + * This function only considers the state saved in task_struct; to test whether
> + * current actually is in lazy MMU mode, in_lazy_mmu_mode() should be used
> + * instead.
> + *
> + * This function is intended for architectures that implement the lazy MMU
> + * mode; it must not be called from generic code.
> + */
> +static inline bool __task_lazy_mmu_mode_active(struct task_struct *tsk)
> +{
> + struct lazy_mmu_state *state = &tsk->lazy_mmu_state;
> +
> + return state->enable_count > 0 && state->pause_count == 0;
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * in_lazy_mmu_mode() - Test whether we are currently in lazy MMU mode.
> + *
> + * Test whether the current context is in lazy MMU mode. This is true if both:
> + * 1. We are not in interrupt context
> + * 2. Lazy MMU mode is active for the current task
> + *
> + * This function is intended for architectures that implement the lazy MMU
> + * mode; it must not be called from generic code.
> + */
> +static inline bool in_lazy_mmu_mode(void)
> +{
> + if (in_interrupt())
> + return false;
> +
> + return __task_lazy_mmu_mode_active(current);
> +}
> +#endif
...
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-11-28 13:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-24 13:22 [PATCH v5 00/12] Nesting support for lazy MMU mode Kevin Brodsky
2025-11-24 13:22 ` [PATCH v5 01/12] powerpc/64s: Do not re-activate batched TLB flush Kevin Brodsky
2025-11-24 13:22 ` [PATCH v5 02/12] x86/xen: simplify flush_lazy_mmu() Kevin Brodsky
2025-12-04 3:36 ` Anshuman Khandual
2025-11-24 13:22 ` [PATCH v5 03/12] powerpc/mm: implement arch_flush_lazy_mmu_mode() Kevin Brodsky
2025-11-24 13:22 ` [PATCH v5 04/12] sparc/mm: " Kevin Brodsky
2025-11-24 13:22 ` [PATCH v5 05/12] mm: introduce CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_LAZY_MMU_MODE Kevin Brodsky
2025-12-01 6:21 ` Anshuman Khandual
2025-12-03 8:19 ` Kevin Brodsky
2025-11-24 13:22 ` [PATCH v5 06/12] mm: introduce generic lazy_mmu helpers Kevin Brodsky
2025-11-28 13:50 ` Alexander Gordeev
2025-12-03 8:20 ` Kevin Brodsky
2025-12-04 4:17 ` Anshuman Khandual
2025-12-05 12:47 ` Kevin Brodsky
2025-11-24 13:22 ` [PATCH v5 07/12] mm: bail out of lazy_mmu_mode_* in interrupt context Kevin Brodsky
2025-11-24 14:11 ` David Hildenbrand (Red Hat)
2025-12-04 4:34 ` Anshuman Khandual
2025-11-24 13:22 ` [PATCH v5 08/12] mm: enable lazy_mmu sections to nest Kevin Brodsky
2025-11-24 14:09 ` David Hildenbrand (Red Hat)
2025-11-27 12:33 ` Alexander Gordeev
2025-11-27 12:45 ` Kevin Brodsky
2025-11-28 13:55 ` Alexander Gordeev [this message]
2025-12-03 8:20 ` Kevin Brodsky
2025-12-04 5:25 ` Anshuman Khandual
2025-12-04 11:53 ` David Hildenbrand (Red Hat)
2025-12-04 6:23 ` Anshuman Khandual
2025-12-04 11:52 ` David Hildenbrand (Red Hat)
2025-12-05 12:50 ` Kevin Brodsky
2025-12-05 12:56 ` Kevin Brodsky
2025-11-24 13:22 ` [PATCH v5 09/12] arm64: mm: replace TIF_LAZY_MMU with in_lazy_mmu_mode() Kevin Brodsky
2025-11-24 14:10 ` David Hildenbrand (Red Hat)
2025-12-04 6:52 ` Anshuman Khandual
2025-12-04 11:39 ` David Hildenbrand (Red Hat)
2025-11-24 13:22 ` [PATCH v5 10/12] powerpc/mm: replace batch->active " Kevin Brodsky
2025-11-24 13:22 ` [PATCH v5 11/12] sparc/mm: " Kevin Brodsky
2025-11-24 13:22 ` [PATCH v5 12/12] x86/xen: use lazy_mmu_state when context-switching Kevin Brodsky
2025-11-24 14:18 ` David Hildenbrand (Red Hat)
2025-11-25 13:39 ` Jürgen Groß
2025-12-03 16:08 ` [PATCH v5 00/12] Nesting support for lazy MMU mode Venkat
2025-12-05 13:00 ` Kevin Brodsky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=23dcf752-0b75-45a7-84f8-25bddf97af08-agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
--to=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andreas@gaisler.com \
--cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jannh@google.com \
--cc=jgross@suse.com \
--cc=kevin.brodsky@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
--cc=maddy@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=ritesh.list@gmail.com \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
--cc=sparclinux@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=venkat88@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
--cc=yeoreum.yun@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox