From: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Ollie Wild <aaw@google.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
parisc-linux@lists.parisc-linux.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
Andi Kleen <ak@muc.de>,
linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Subject: Re: [patch] remove MAX_ARG_PAGES
Date: Tue, 02 Jan 2007 18:18:48 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <23996.1167761928@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20061229200357.GA5940@elte.hu>
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> wrote:
> FYI, i have forward ported your MAX_ARG_PAGES limit removal patch to
> 2.6.20-rc2 and have included it in the -rt kernel. It's working great -
> i can now finally do a "ls -t patches/*.patch" in my patch repository -
> something i havent been able to do for years ;-)
I get a NULL kernel pointer reference with this patch with FRV in MMU mode.
It's whilst the kernel is attempting to execute init:
(gdb) bt
#0 0xc0063d54 in do_anonymous_page (mm=0xc05c1a04, vma=0xc05c884c, address=3221225457, page_table=0xdc00bffc, pmd=0xc05c6f00, write_access=0) at pgtable.h:525
#1 0xc006468c in __handle_mm_fault (mm=0xbffffff1, vma=0xc05c884c, address=3691036668, write_access=1) at memory.c:2404
#2 0xc0061c18 in get_user_pages (tsk=0xc034eba0, mm=0xc05c1a04, start=3221225457, len=1, write=1, force=0, pages=0xc0353b80, vmas=0x0) at memory.c:1064
#3 0xc0084c7c in copy_strings (argc=0, argv=0xc0388c3c, bprm=0xc0388b88) at exec.c:326
#4 0xc0084dac in copy_strings_kernel (argc=1, argv=0xc05c884c, bprm=0xbffffff1) at exec.c:365
#5 0xc0085f5c in do_execve (filename=0xc0387000 "/sbin/init", argv=0xc026e8c8, envp=0xc026e950, regs=0xc0353bf8) at exec.c:1158
#6 0xc000f55c in sys_execve (name=0x1 <Address 0x1 out of bounds>, argv=0xc026e8c8, envp=0xc026e950) at process.c:263
#7 0xc000e1e0 in __syscall_call () at arch/frv/kernel/entry.S:878
#8 0xc000e1e0 in __syscall_call () at arch/frv/kernel/entry.S:878
The problem appears to be that current->mm is NULL. It's a bit difficult to
say for sure because gdb or gcc determined that the error is in pgtable.h, but
doesn't seem to have determined which one.
However, looking at the code, I think it must be this:
static int do_anonymous_page(struct mm_struct *mm, ...)
{
...
update_mmu_cache(vma, address, entry);
...
}
But that uses current->mm, which is NULL, via this function:
[include/asm-frv/pgtable.h]
/* * preload information about a newly instantiated PTE into the SCR0/SCR1 PGE
cache */
static inline void update_mmu_cache(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
unsigned long address, pte_t pte)
{
unsigned long ampr;
pgd_t *pge = pgd_offset(current->mm, address);
pud_t *pue = pud_offset(pge, address);
pmd_t *pme = pmd_offset(pue, address);
ampr = pme->ste[0] & 0xffffff00;
ampr |= xAMPRx_L | xAMPRx_SS_16Kb | xAMPRx_S | xAMPRx_C | xAMPRx_V;
asm volatile("movgs %0,scr0\n"
"movgs %0,scr1\n"
"movgs %1,dampr4\n"
"movgs %1,dampr5\n"
:
: "r"(address), "r"(ampr)
);
}
This really oughtn't to be called in this situation, I suspect. I could just
skip the operation if current->mm is NULL, but I'm not sure that that's the
right thing to do. Maybe I should be using current->active_mm instead.
Everything works fine without the patch.
David
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-01-02 18:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-10-11 0:05 Removing MAX_ARG_PAGES (request for comments/assistance) Ollie Wild
2006-10-11 8:00 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-10-11 17:13 ` Ollie Wild
2006-10-11 13:14 ` Peter Zijlstra
2006-10-11 21:48 ` Ollie Wild
2006-10-24 17:48 ` Ollie Wild
2006-12-29 20:03 ` [patch] remove MAX_ARG_PAGES Ingo Molnar
2006-12-29 20:49 ` Russell King
2006-12-29 21:23 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-12-29 22:20 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-12-29 21:57 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-01-01 6:51 ` Ollie Wild
2007-01-01 6:58 ` Ollie Wild
2007-01-01 17:28 ` Pavel Machek
2007-01-02 18:18 ` David Howells [this message]
2007-01-02 17:52 ` Removing MAX_ARG_PAGES (request for comments/assistance) David Howells
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=23996.1167761928@redhat.com \
--to=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=aaw@google.com \
--cc=ak@muc.de \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=arjan@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=parisc-linux@lists.parisc-linux.org \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox