linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: zijun_hu <zijun_hu@zoho.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: zijun_hu@htc.com, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	mingo@kernel.org, rientjes@google.com, iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com,
	mgorman@techsingularity.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] lib/ioremap.c: avoid endless loop under ioremapping page unaligned ranges
Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2016 23:41:33 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <238b0d3e-2e6b-7f73-8168-d21517e862bb@zoho.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160923144202.GA31387@htj.duckdns.org>

On 2016/9/23 22:42, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 12:19:53PM +0800, zijun_hu wrote:
>> From: zijun_hu <zijun_hu@htc.com>
>>
>> endless loop maybe happen if either of parameter addr and end is not
>> page aligned for kernel API function ioremap_page_range()
>>
>> in order to fix this issue and alert improper range parameters to user
>> WARN_ON() checkup and rounding down range lower boundary are performed
>> firstly, loop end condition within ioremap_pte_range() is optimized due
>> to lack of relevant macro pte_addr_end()
>>
>> Signed-off-by: zijun_hu <zijun_hu@htc.com>
> 
> Unfortunately, I can't see what the points are in this series of
> patches.  Most seem to be gratuitous changes which don't address real
> issues or improve anything.  "I looked at the code and realized that,
> if the input were wrong, the function would misbehave" isn't good
> enough a reason.  What's next?  Are we gonna harden all pointer taking
> functions too?
> 
> For internal functions, we don't by default do input sanitization /
> sanity check.  There sure are cases where doing so is beneficial but
> reading a random function and thinking "oh this combo of parameters
> can make it go bonkers" isn't the right approach for it.  We end up
> with cruft and code changes which nobody needed in the first place and
> can easily introduce actual real bugs in the process.
> 
> It'd be an a lot more productive use of time and effort for everyone
> involved if the work is around actual issues.
> 
> Thanks.
> 
thanks for your reply firstly
1. ioremap_page_range() is not a kernel internal function
2. sanity check "BUG_ON(addr >= end)" have existed already, but don't check enough
3. are there any obvious hint for rang parameter requirements but BUG_ON(addr >= end)
4. if range which seems right but wrong really is used such as mapping 
   virtual range [0x80000800, 0x80007800) to physical area[0x20000800, 0x20007800)
   what actions should we take? warning message and trying to finish user request
   or panic kernel or hang system in endless loop or return -EINVALi 1/4 ?
   how to help user find their problem?
5. if both boundary of the range are aligned to page, ioremap_page_range() works well
   otherwise endless loop maybe happens


--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2016-09-23 15:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-09-21  4:19 zijun_hu
2016-09-22 12:47 ` Michal Hocko
2016-09-22 15:13   ` zijun_hu
2016-09-23  8:45     ` Michal Hocko
2016-09-23 12:29       ` zijun_hu
2016-09-23 12:42         ` Michal Hocko
2016-09-23 13:00           ` zijun_hu
2016-09-23 13:33             ` Michal Hocko
2016-09-23 14:14               ` zijun_hu
2016-09-23 14:27                 ` Michal Hocko
2016-09-23 14:58                   ` zijun_hu
2016-09-23  5:53 ` [PATCH v2 " zijun_hu
2016-09-23 14:42 ` [PATCH " Tejun Heo
2016-09-23 15:41   ` zijun_hu [this message]
2016-09-23 16:23     ` Tejun Heo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=238b0d3e-2e6b-7f73-8168-d21517e862bb@zoho.com \
    --to=zijun_hu@zoho.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=zijun_hu@htc.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox