From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-qk0-f176.google.com (mail-qk0-f176.google.com [209.85.220.176]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9E4C6B00BA for ; Mon, 18 May 2015 09:29:08 -0400 (EDT) Received: by qkgw4 with SMTP id w4so68686660qkg.3 for ; Mon, 18 May 2015 06:29:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com. [209.132.183.28]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id o32si10224588qko.57.2015.05.18.06.29.07 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 18 May 2015 06:29:08 -0700 (PDT) From: David Howells In-Reply-To: References: <7254.1431945085@warthog.procyon.org.uk> Subject: Re: [RFC] Refactor kenter/kleave/kdebug macros MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <23798.1431955741.1@warthog.procyon.org.uk> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Mon, 18 May 2015 14:29:01 +0100 Message-ID: <23799.1431955741@warthog.procyon.org.uk> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Leon Romanovsky Cc: dhowells@redhat.com, Linux-MM , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , linux-cachefs , linux-afs Leon Romanovsky wrote: > Blind conversion to pr_debug will blow the code because it will be alway= s > compiled in. No, it won't. > Additionally, It looks like the output of these macros can be viewed by = ftrace > mechanism. *blink* It can? > Maybe we should delete them from mm/nommu.c as was pointed by Joe? Why? David -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org