From: "Kohli, Gaurav" <gkohli@codeaurora.org>
To: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, mhocko@suse.com,
kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com, aarcange@redhat.com,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: oom: Fix race condition between oom_badness and do_exit of task
Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2018 10:21:26 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <22ebd655-ece4-37e5-5a98-e9750cb20665@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1803071254410.165297@chino.kir.corp.google.com>
On 3/8/2018 2:26 AM, David Rientjes wrote:
> On Wed, 7 Mar 2018, Gaurav Kohli wrote:
>
>> diff --git a/mm/oom_kill.c b/mm/oom_kill.c
>> index 6fd9773..5f4cc4b 100644
>> --- a/mm/oom_kill.c
>> +++ b/mm/oom_kill.c
>> @@ -114,9 +114,11 @@ struct task_struct *find_lock_task_mm(struct task_struct *p)
>>
>> for_each_thread(p, t) {
>> task_lock(t);
>> + get_task_struct(t);
>> if (likely(t->mm))
>> goto found;
>> task_unlock(t);
>> + put_task_struct(t);
>> }
>> t = NULL;
>> found:
> We hold rcu_read_lock() here, so perhaps only do get_task_struct() before
> doing rcu_read_unlock() and we have a non-NULL t?
Here rcu_read_lock will not help, as our task may change due to below algo:
for_each_thread(p, t) {
task_lock(t);
+ get_task_struct(t);
if (likely(t->mm))
goto found;
task_unlock(t);
+ put_task_struct(t)
So only we can increase usage counter here only at the current task.
I have seen you new patch, that seems valid to me and it will resolve our issue.
Thanks for support.
Regards
Gaurav
>
--
Qualcomm India Private Limited, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-03-08 4:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-03-07 12:57 Gaurav Kohli
2018-03-07 20:56 ` David Rientjes
2018-03-08 4:51 ` Kohli, Gaurav [this message]
2018-03-08 14:05 ` Tetsuo Handa
2018-03-09 7:11 ` Kohli, Gaurav
2018-03-09 10:48 ` Tetsuo Handa
2018-03-09 12:04 ` Kohli, Gaurav
2018-03-09 12:18 ` Tetsuo Handa
2018-03-13 13:37 ` Michal Hocko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=22ebd655-ece4-37e5-5a98-e9750cb20665@codeaurora.org \
--to=gkohli@codeaurora.org \
--cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox