From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-12.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7D21C63777 for ; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 08:56:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24683241A5 for ; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 08:56:14 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=suse.com header.i=@suse.com header.b="Y++3q5UJ" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 24683241A5 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=suse.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 72DA76B0036; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 03:56:14 -0500 (EST) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 6DCCE6B005C; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 03:56:14 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 5CB6E6B0070; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 03:56:14 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0221.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.221]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D5B86B0036 for ; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 03:56:14 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtpin08.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay02.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9BFF281F for ; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 08:56:13 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 77496932226.08.chair16_6106f2227338 Received: from filter.hostedemail.com (10.5.16.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.16.251]) by smtpin08.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB7D11819E766 for ; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 08:56:13 +0000 (UTC) X-HE-Tag: chair16_6106f2227338 X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 5897 Received: from mx2.suse.de (mx2.suse.de [195.135.220.15]) by imf07.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 08:56:13 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at test-mx.suse.de DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.com; s=susede1; t=1605689772; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=7igakkmhEI4CwNFDZCT70CUptcTv+K/s+YCPQmQlu9Q=; b=Y++3q5UJgDUWDlWdeDn6mQNNYdWrbUeFS91t9OchR29jrBjxggFIPk/Zt9w7d5o8Y5Vame 8OeLl6cMI/636YtXiKuW5EanOqCgIw218k8knrDwI/S+PfWCYEvotYadONsuLQegM5GdhK 3wwWlNOxGUloBVFJNsllEo8czXvQANE= Received: from relay2.suse.de (unknown [195.135.221.27]) by mx2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6417AD2F; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 08:56:11 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: merge struct block_device and struct hd_struct To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: Tejun Heo , Josef Bacik , Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk , Coly Li , Mike Snitzer , dm-devel@redhat.com, Richard Weinberger , Jan Kara , linux-block@vger.kernel.org, xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, Jens Axboe References: <20201118084800.2339180-1-hch@lst.de> From: Jan Beulich Message-ID: <22ca5396-0253-f286-9eab-d417b2e0b3ad@suse.com> Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2020 09:56:11 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.4.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20201118084800.2339180-1-hch@lst.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: Christoph, On 18.11.2020 09:47, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > Diffstat: > block/bio.c | 6 > block/blk-cgroup.c | 50 +- > block/blk-core.c | 85 +-- > block/blk-flush.c | 2 > block/blk-iocost.c | 36 - > block/blk-lib.c | 2 > block/blk-merge.c | 6 > block/blk-mq.c | 11 > block/blk-mq.h | 5 > block/blk.h | 92 ---- > block/genhd.c | 444 +++++--------------- > block/ioctl.c | 7 > block/partitions/core.c | 238 +++-------- > drivers/block/drbd/drbd_receiver.c | 2 > drivers/block/drbd/drbd_worker.c | 2 > drivers/block/loop.c | 21 > drivers/block/nbd.c | 6 > drivers/block/xen-blkback/common.h | 4 > drivers/block/xen-blkfront.c | 20 > drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c | 20 > drivers/md/bcache/request.c | 4 > drivers/md/bcache/super.c | 53 -- > drivers/md/dm-table.c | 9 > drivers/md/dm.c | 16 > drivers/md/md.c | 8 > drivers/mtd/mtdsuper.c | 17 > drivers/nvme/target/admin-cmd.c | 20 > drivers/s390/block/dasd.c | 8 > drivers/s390/block/dasd_ioctl.c | 9 > drivers/scsi/scsicam.c | 2 > drivers/target/target_core_file.c | 6 > drivers/target/target_core_pscsi.c | 7 > drivers/usb/gadget/function/storage_common.c | 8 > fs/block_dev.c | 578 ++++++++------------------- > fs/btrfs/sysfs.c | 15 > fs/btrfs/volumes.c | 13 > fs/ext4/super.c | 18 > fs/ext4/sysfs.c | 10 > fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c | 5 > fs/f2fs/f2fs.h | 2 > fs/f2fs/super.c | 8 > fs/f2fs/sysfs.c | 9 > fs/inode.c | 3 > fs/internal.h | 7 > fs/io_uring.c | 10 > fs/pipe.c | 5 > fs/pstore/blk.c | 2 > fs/quota/quota.c | 40 + > fs/statfs.c | 2 > fs/super.c | 86 ---- > include/linux/blk-cgroup.h | 4 > include/linux/blk_types.h | 26 + > include/linux/blkdev.h | 24 - > include/linux/fs.h | 5 > include/linux/genhd.h | 104 ---- > include/linux/part_stat.h | 17 > init/do_mounts.c | 271 +++++------- > kernel/trace/blktrace.c | 54 -- > mm/filemap.c | 9 > 59 files changed, 837 insertions(+), 1716 deletions(-) since this isn't the first series from you recently spamming xen-devel, may I ask that you don't Cc entire series to lists which are involved with perhaps just one out of the many patches? IMO Cc lists should be compiled on a per-patch basis; the cover letter may of course be sent to the union of all of them. Thanks much, Jan